THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY OF — £x I ^/86^> ^$KSiiflt>*S ^/|~66^1 OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY ^5^ a s 6 IFF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY ffr?/ • 2IR.G.KIIELLER I THE LIFE OF SIR ISAAC NEWTON BY DAVID BREWSTER, LL.D. F.R.S. Ergo vivida vis anim? pervicit, et extra Processit longe flamnwntia moenia mundi ; Atque omoe immensum peragravit meote animoque. Lttcret. lib. i. 1. 731 The Birthplace of Ncwtoa. NEW-YORK: PUBLISHED BY HARPER & BROTHERS, NO. 82 C L I F F-S T R E K T. 1840. TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LORD BRAYBROOKE. THE kindness with which your lordship intrusted to me some very valuable materials for the compo- sition of this volume has induced me to embrace the present opportunity of publicly acknowledging it. But even if this personal obligation had been less powerful, those literary attainments and that en- lightened benevolence which reflect upon rank its highest lustre would have justified me in seeking for it the patronage of a name which they have so justly honoured* DAVID BREWSTER. Allerly, June 1st, 1831. A/767/7 PREFACE. As this is the only Life of Sir Isaac Newton on any considerable scale that has yet appeared, I have experienced great difficulty in preparing it for the public. The materials collected by preceding biographers were extremely scanty ; the particulars of his early life, and even the historical details of his discoveries, have been less perfectly preserved than those of his illustrious predecessors ; and it is not creditable to his disciples that they have allowed a whole century to elapse without any suitable record of the life and labours of a master who united every claim to their affection and gratitude. In drawing up this volume, I have obtained much assistance from the account of Sir Isaac Newton in the Biographia Britannica ; from the letters to Ol- denburg, arid other papers in Bishop Horsley's edition of his works ; from Tumor's Collections for the History of the Town and Soke of Grantham ; from M. Biot's excellent Life of Newton in the Biographic Universelle ; and from Lord King's Life and Correspondence of Locke. Although these works contain much important information respecting the Life of Newton, yet I have been so fortunate as to obtain many new ma- terials of considerable value. 10 PREFACE. To the kindness of Lord Braybrooke I have been indebted for the interesting correspondence of New- ton, Mr. Pepys, and Mr. Millington, which is now published for the first time, and which throws much light upon an event in the life of our author that has recently acquired an unexpected and a painful importance. These letters, when combined with those which passed between Newton and Locke, and with a curious extract from the manuscript diary of Mr. Abraham Pryme, kindly furnished to me by his collateral descendant Professor Pryme of Cam- bridge, fill up a blank in his history, and have ena- bled me to delineate in its true character that tem- porary indisposition which, from the view that has been taken of it by foreign philosophers, has been the occasion of such deep distress to the friends of science and religion. To Professor Whewell, of Cambridge, I owe very great obligations for much valuable information. Professor Rigaud, of Oxford, to whose kindness I have on many other occasions been indebted, sup plied me with several important facts, and with ex tracts from the diary of Hearne in the Bodleian Library, and from the original correspondence be- tween Newton and Flamstead, which the president of Corpus Christi College had for this purpose com- mitted to his care ; and Dr. J. C. Gregory, of Edin- burgh, the descendant of the illustrious inventor of the reflecting telescope, allowed me to use his un- published account of an autograph manuscript of Sir Isaac Newton, which was found among the pa- pers of David Gregory, Savilian Professor of As- tronomy at Oxford, and which throws some light on the history of the Principia. PREFACE. 11 I have been indebted to many other friends for the communication of books and facts, but espe- cially to Sir William Hamilton, Bart., whose libe- rality in promoting literary inquiry is not limited to the circle of his friends. D.B. Alhrly, June 1st, 1831. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Pag» The Pre-eminence of Sir Isaac Newton's Reputation — The Interest attached to the Study of his Life and Writings — His Birth and Parentage — His e^rly Education— Is sent to Grantham School— His early Attachment to Mechanical Pursuits — His Windmill — His Water-clock— His Self-moving Cart— His Sun-dials— His Preparation for the University H CHAPTER II. Newton enters Trinity College, Cambridge — Origin of his Propen- sity for Mathematics — He studies the Geometry of Descartes unas- sisted— Purchases a Prism — Revises Dr. Barrow's Optical Lec- tures— Dr. Barrow's Opinion respecting Colours — Takes his De- grees— Is appointed a Fellow of Trinity College — Succeeds Dr. Barrow in the Lucasian Chair of Mathematics 26 CHAPTER III. Newton occupied in grinding Hyperbolical Lenses— His first Ex- periments with the Prism made in 1666 — He discovers the Com- position of White Light, and the different Refrangibility of the Rays which compose it — Abandons his Attempts to improve Re- fracting Telescopes, and resolves to attempt the Construction of Reflecting ones — He quits Cambridge on account of the Plague — Constructs two Reflecting Telescopes in 1668, the first ever exe- cuted—One of them examined by the Royal Society, and shown to the King — He constructs a Telescope with Glass Specula — Re- eent History of the Reflecting Telescope — Mr. Airy's Glass Specula —Hadley's Reflecting Telascopes— Short's— Berschel's— -Ram- age*s — Lord Oxmantown's 30 CHAPTER IV. He delivers a Course of Optical Lectures at Cambridge— Is elected Fellow of the Royal Society — He communicates to them his Dis- coveries on the different Refrangibility and Nature of Light- Popular Account of them— They involve him in various Contro- versies—His Dispute with Pardies— Linus— Lucas— Dr. Hooke . and Mr. Huygens — The Influence of these Disputes on the mind of Newton 47 CHAPTER V. Mistake of Newton in supposing that the Improvement of Befraot- B 14 CONTENTS. Pag» ing Telescopes was hopeless — Mr. Hall invents the Achromatic Telescope— Principles of the Achromatic Telescope explained— It is reinvented by Dollond, and improved by future Artists — Dr. Blair's Aplanatic Telescope — Mistakes in Newton's Analysis of the Spectrum — Modern Discoveries respecting the Structure of the Spectrum 63 CHAPTER VI. Colours of thin Plates first studied by Boyle and Hooke— Newton determines the Law of their Production — His Theory of Fits of easy Reflection and Transmission— Colours of thick Plates 75 CHAPTER VII. Newton's Theory of the Colours of Natural Bodies explained — Ob- jections to it stated — New Classification of Colours— Outline of a new Theory proposed 89 CHAPTER VIII. Newton's Discoveries respecting the Inflection or Diffraction of Light — Previous Discoveries of Grimaldi and Dr. Hooke — Labours of succeeding Philosophers— Law of Interference of Dr. Young— Fresnel's Discoveries —New Theory of Inflection on the Hypothe- sis of the Materiality of Light 99 CHAPTER IX. Miscellaneous Optical Researches of Newton — His Experiments on Refraction— His Conjecture respecting the Inflammability of the Diamond— His Law of Double Refraction— His Observations on the Polarization of Light— Newton's Theory of Light— His " Op- tics" 106 CHAPTER X. Astronomical Discoveries of Newton— Necessity of combined Exer tion to the completion of great Discoveries — Sketch of the History of Astronomy prexrfous to the time of Newton— Copernicus, 1473 -1543— TychoBrahe, 1546-1601— Kepler, 1571-1631— Galileo, 1564 -1642 110 CHAPTER XI. The first Idea of Gravity occurs to Newton in 1666— His first Specu- lations upon it— Interrupted by his Optical Experiments— He resumes the Subject in consequence of a Discussion with Doctor Hooke — He discovers t'je true Law of Gravity and the Cause of the Planetary Motions— Dr. Halley urges him to publish his Prin- cipia — His Principles of Natural Philosophy — Proceedings of the Royal Society on this Subject— The Principia appears in 1687— General Account of it, and of the Discoveries it contains — They meet with great Opposition, owing to the Prevalence of the Carte- sian System — Account of the Reception and Progress of the New- tonian Philosophy in Foreign Countries — Account of its Progress and Establishment in England 140 CONTENTS. 15 CHAPTER XIL Paga Doctrine of Infinite Quantities— Labours of Pappus— Kepler— Cava- leri — Roberval— Fermat — Wallis — Newton discovers the Bino- mial Theorem and the Doctrine of Fluxions in 16C6 — His Manu- script Work containing this Doctrine communicated to his Friends — His Treatise on Fluxions — His Mathematical Tracts — His Uni- versal Arithmetic— His Methodus Differentials — His Geornetria Analytica — His Solution of the Problems proposed by Bernouilli and Leibnitz — Account of the celebrated Dispute respecting the Invention of Fluxions— Commercium Epistolicurn — Report of the Royal Society — General View of the Controversy 168 CHAPTER Xin. James IT. attacks the Privileges of the University of Cambridge Newton chosen one of the Dtlegates to resist this Encroachment —He is elected a Member of the Convention Parliament— Burning of his Manuscript — His supposed Derangement of Mind — View taken of this by foreign Philosophers — His Correspondence with Mr. Pepys and Mr. Locke at the time of his Illness— Mr. Milling- ton's Letter to Mr. Pepys on the subject of Newton's Illness — Refutation of the Statement that he laboured under Mental De- rangement 200 CHAPTER XIV. No Mark of National Gratitude conferred upon Newton — Friendship between him and Charles Montague, afterward Earl of Halifax — Mr. Montague appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer in 1604 — He resolves upon a Recoinage — Nominates Mr. Newton Warden of the Mint in 1695 — Mr. Newton appointed Master of the Mint in 1699— Notice of the Earl of Halifax— Mr. Newton elected Asso- ciate of the Academy of Sciences in 1699 — Member for Cambridge in 1701— and President cf the Royal Society in 1703— Queen Anne confers upon him the Honour of Knighthood in 1705 — Second Edition of the Principia, edited by Cotes— His Conduct respectvjg Mr. Ditton's Method of finding the Longitude 223 CHAPTER XV. Respect in which Newton was held at the Court of George I. — The Princess of Wales delighted with his Conversation — Leibnitz en- deavours to prejudice the Princess against Sir Isaac and Locke — ' Controversy occasioned by his Conduct — The Princess obtains a Manuscript Abstract of his System of Chronology — The Abbe Conti is, at her request, allowed to take a Copy of it on the prom- ise of Secrecy — He prints it surreptitiously in French, accompa- nied with a Refutation by M. Freret— Sir Isaac's Defence of his System— Father Souciet attacks it, and is answered by Dr. Halley — Sir Isaac's larger Work on Chronology published afler his Death—Opinions respecting it— Sir Isaac's Paper on the Form of the most ancient Year •••• 234 CHAPTER XVI. Theological Studies of Sir Isaac— Their Importance to Christianity —-Motives to which they have been ascribed— Opinions of Biot 16 CONTENTS. Faff and La Place considered— His Theological Researches begun be- fore his supposed Mental Illness— The Date of these Works fixed —Letters to Locke— Account of his Observations on Prophecy — His Lexicon Propheticum— His Four Letters to Dr. Bentley— Ori gin of Newton's Theological Studies— Analogy between the Book of Nature and that of Revelation 242 CHAPTER XVH. The Minor Discoveries and Inventions of Newton— His Researches on Heat— On Fire and Flame— On Elective Attraction— On the Structure of Bodies — His supposed Attachment to Alchymy — His Hypothesis respecting Ether as the Cause of Light and Gravity —On the Excitation of Electricity in Glass— His Reflecting Sex- tant invented before 1700— His Reflecting Microscope— His Pris- matic Reflector as a Substitute for the small Speculum of Reflect- ing Telescopes— His Method of varying the Magnifying Power of Newtonian Telescopes— His Experiments on Impressions on the Retina 265 CHAPTER XVIII. His Acquaintance with Dr. Pemberton— Who edits the Third Edi- tion of the Principia— His first Attack of ill Health— His Recovery —He is taken ill in consequence of attending the Royal Society — His Death on the 20th March, 1727— His Body lies in state— His Funeral— He is buried in Westminster Abbey— His Monument de- scribed—His Epitaph— A Medal struck in honour of him— Roubil- iac's full-length Statue of him erected in Cambridge — Division of his Property— His Successors 284 CHAPTER XIX. Permanence of Newton's Reputation — Character of his Genius— His Method of Investigation similar to that used by Galileo — Error in ascribing his Discoveries to the Use of the Methods recommended by Lord Bacon— The Pretensions of the Baconian Philosophy examined — Sir Isaac Newton's Social Character — His great Modesty— The Simplicity of his Character— His Religious and Moral Character — His Hospitality and Mode of Life — His Generosity and Charity— His Absence— His Personal Appear- ance—Statues and Pictures of him— Memorials and Recollections of him 292 APPENDIX, No. I.— Observations on the Family of Sir Isaac New- ton 307 APPENDIX, No. n.— Letter from Sir Isaac Newton to Francis Aston, Esq., a young Friend who was on the eve of setting out on his Travels 318 APPENDIX, No. HI.— " A Remarkable and Curious Conversation be- tween Sir Isaac Newton and Mr. Conduit." 320 LIFE off SIR ISAAC NEWTON. CHAPTER I. The Pre-eminence of Sir Isaac Newton's Reputation— The Interest attached to the Study of his Life and Writings— His Birth and Parentage — His early Education— Is sent to Grantham School — His early Attachment to Mechanical Pursuits— His Windmill—His Waterclock — His Selfmoving Cart — His Sundials — His Preparation for the University. THE name of Sir Isaac Newton has by general consent been placed at the head of those great men who have been the ornaments of their species. However imposing be the attributes with which time has invested the sages and the heroes of anti- quity, the brightness of their fame has been eclipsed, by the splendour of his reputation ; and neither the partiality of rival nations, nor the vanity of a presump- tuous age, has ventured to dispute the ascendency of his genius. The philosopher,* indeed, to whom posterity will probably assign the place next to New- ton, has characterized the Principia as pre-eminent above all the productions of human intellect, and has thus divested of extravagance the contemporary encomium upon its author, Nee fas est propius mortal! attingere Divos. HALLET. So near the gods— man cannot nearer go. I — — — . — * The Marquis La Place.— See Systtme du Monde, p. 336. B2 18 SIR ISAAC NEWTON The biography of an individual so highly renowned cannot fail to excite a general interest. Though his course may have lain in the vale of private life, and may have been unmarked with those dramatic events which throw a lustre even round perishable names, yet the inquiring spirit will explore the his- tory of a mind so richly endowed, — will study its intellectual and moral phases, and will seek the shelter of its authority on those great questions which reason has abandoned to faith and hope. If the conduct and opinions of men of ordinary talent are recorded for our instruction, how inter- esting must it be to follow the most exalted genius through the incidents of common life ; — to mark the steps by which he attained his lofty pre-eminence ; to see how he performs the functions of the social and the domestic compact; how he exercises his lofty powers of invention and discovery; how he comports himself in the arena of intellectual strife ; and in what sentiments, and with what aspirations he quits the world which he has adorned. In almost all these bearings, the life and writings of Sir Isaac Newton abound with the richest counsel. Here the philosopher will learn the art by which alone he can acquire an immortal name. The mor- alist will trace the lineaments of a character ad- justed to all the symmetry of which our imperfect nature is susceptible; and the Christian will con- template with delight the high-priest of science quitting the study of the material universe, — the scene of his intellectual triumphs, — to investigate with humility and patience the mysteries of his faith. Sir Isaac Newton was born at Woolsthorpe, a hamlet in the parish of Colsterworth, in Lincoln- shire, about six miles south of Grantham, on the 25th December, O. S., 1642, exactly one year after Galileo died, and was baptized at Colsterworth on the 1st January, 1643-3. His father, Mr. Isaac New- BIRTH. 19 ton, died at the early age of thirty-six, a little more than a year after the death of his father Robert Newton, and only a few months after his marriage to Harriet Ayscough, daughter of James Ayscough of Market Overton in Rutlandshire. This lady was accordingly left in a state of pregnancy, and appears to have given a premature birth to her only and posthumous child. The helpless infant thus ushered into the world WPS of such an extremely diminutive size,* and seemed of so perishable a frame, that two women who were sent to Lady Pakenham's at North Witham, to bring some medicine to strengthen him, did not expect to find him alive on their return. Providence, however, had otherwise decreed; and that frail tenement which seemed scarcely able to imprison its immortal mind was destined to enjoy a vigorous maturity, and to survive even the average term of human existence. The estate of Wools- thorpe, in the manor-house of which this remarka- ble birth took place, had been more than a hundred years in the possession of the family, who came originally from Newton in Lancashire, but who had, previous to the purchase of Woolsthorpe, settled at Westby, in the county of Lincoln. The manor- house, of which we have given an engraving, is situated in a beautiful little valley, remarkable for its copious wells of pure spring water, on the west side of the river Witham, which has its origin in the neighbourhood, and commands an agreeable pros- pect to the east towards Colsterworth. The manor of Woolsthorpe was worth only 30Z. per annum; but Mrs. Newton possessed another small estate at Sewstern,f which raised the annual value of their property to about 80Z. ; and it is probable that the cultivation of the little farm on which she resided * Sir Isaac Newton told Mr. Conduit, that he had often heard his mother say that when he was born he was so little that they might have put him into a quart mug. t In Leicestershire, and about three miles south-east of Woolsthorpe. 20 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. somewhat enlarged the limited income upon which she had to support herself, and educate her child. For three years Mrs. Newton continued to watch over her tender charge with parental anxiety ; but in consequence of her marriage to the Reverend Barnabas Smith, rector of North Witham, about a mile south of Woolsthorpe, she left him under the care of her own mother. At the usual age he was sent to two day-schools at Skillington and Stoke, where he acquired the education which such semi- naries afforded; but when he reached his twelfth year he went to the public school at Grantham, taught by Mr. Stokes, and was boarded at the house of Mr. Clark, an apothecary in that town. Accord- ing to information which Sir Isaac himself gave to Mr. Conduit, he seems to have been very inattentive to his studies, and very low in the school. The boy, however, who was above him, having one day given him a severe kick upon his stomach, from which he suffered great pain, Isaac laboured inces- santly till he got above him in the school, and from that time he continued to rise till he was the head boy. From the habits of application which this incident had led him to form, the peculiar character of his mind was speedily displayed. During the hours of play, when the other boys were occupied with their amusements, his mind was engrossed with mechanical contrivances, either in imitation of some- thing which he • had seen, or in execution of some original conception of his own. For this purpose he provided himself with little saws, hatchets, ham- mers, and all sorts .of tools, which he acquired the art -of using with singular dexterity. The principal pieces of mechanism which he thus constructed were a windmill, a waterclock, and a carriage put in motion by the person who sat in it. When a wind- mill was erecting near Grantham on the road to Gunnerby, Isaac frequently attended the operations of the workmen, and acquired such a thorough MECHANICAL PURSUITS. 21 knowledge of the machinery that he completed a working model of it, which excited universal admi- ration. This model was frequently placed on the top of the house in which he lodged at Grantham, and was put in motion by the action of the wind upon its sails. Not content with this exact • imitation of the original machine, he conceived the idea of driv- ing it by animal power, and for this purpose he en- closed in it a mouse which he called the miller, and which, by acting upon a sort of treadwheel, gave motion to the machine. According to some ac- counts, the mouse was made to advance by pulling a string attached to its tail, while others allege that the power of the little agent was called forth by its unavailing attempts to reach a portion of corn placed above the wheel. His waterclock was formed out of a box which he had solicited from Mrs. Clark's brother. It was about four feet high, and of a proportional breadth, somewhat like a common houseclock. The index of the dialplate was turned by a piece of wood, which either fell or rose by the action of dropping water. As it stood in his own bedroom he supplied it every morning with the requisite quantity of water, and it was used as a clock by Mr. Clark's family, and re- mained in the house long after its inventor had quitted Grantham.* His mechanical carriage was a vehicle with four wheels, which was put in motion with a handle wrought by the person who sat in it, but, like Merlin's chair, it seems to have been used only on the smooth surface of a floor, and not fitted to overcome the inequalities of a road. Although <• * "I remember once," says Dr. Stukely, "when I was deputy to Dr. Halley, secretary at the Royal Society, Sir Isaac talked of these kind of instruments. That he observed the chief inconvenience in them was, that the hole through which the water is transmitted being necessarily very small, was subject to be furred up by impurities in the water, as those made with sand will wear bigger, which at length causes an inequality in time." — Stukely 's Letter to Dr. Mead. — Tumor's CoZ- lections, p. 177. 22 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. Newton was at this time " a sober, silent, thinking lad," who scarcely ever joined in the ordinary games of his schoolfellows, yet he took great pleasure in providing them with amusements of a scientific character. He introduced into the school the flying of paper kites ; and he is said to have been at great pains in determining their best forms and propor- tions, and in ascertaining the position and number of the points by which the string should be attached. He made also paper lanterns, by the light of which he went to school in the winter mornings, and he frequently attached these lanterns to the tails of his kites in a dark night, so as to inspire the country people with the belief that they were comets. In the house where he lodged there were some female inmates in whose company he appears to have taken much pleasure. One of these, a Miss Storey, sister to Dr. Storey, a physician at Buckminster, near Colsterworth, was two or three years younger than Newton, and to great personal attractions she seems to have added more than the usual allotment of female talent. The society of this young lady and her companions was always preferred to that of his own schoolfellows, and it was one of his most agreeable occupations to construct for them little tables and cupboards, and other utensils for holding their dolls and their trinkets. He had lived nearly six years in the same house with Miss Storey, and there is reason to believe that their youthful friend- ship gradually rose to a higher passion; but the smallness of her portion and the inadequacy of his own fortune appear to have prevented the consum- mation of their happiness. Miss Storey was after- ward twice married, and under the name of Mrs. Vincent, Dr. Stukely visited her at Grantham in 1727, at the age of eighty-two, and obtained from her many particulars respecting the early history of our author. Newton's esteem for her continued un- abated during his life. He regularly visited her when SUNDIALS. 23 he went to Lincolnshire, and never failed to relieve her from little pecuniary difficulties which seem to have beset her family. Among the early passions of Newton we must recount his love of drawing ; and even of writing verses. His own room was furnished with pictures drawn, coloured, and framed by himself, sometimes from copies, but often from life.* Among these were portraits of Dr. Donne, Mr. Stokes, the master of Grantham school, and King Charles I. under whose picture were the following verses. A secret art my soul requires to try, If prayers can give me what the wars deny. Three crowns distinguished here, in order do Present their objects to my knowing view. Earth's crown, thus at my feet I can disdain, Which heavy is, and at the best but vain. But now a crown of thorns I gladly greet, Sharp is this crown, but not so sharp as sweety The crown of glory that I yonder see Is full of bliss and of eternity. These verses were repeated to Dr. Stukely by Mrs. Vincent, who believed them to be written by Sir Isaac, a circumstance which is the more probable, as he himself assured Mr. Conduit, with some ex- pression of pleasure, tHat he " excelled in making verses," although he had been heard to express a contempt for poetical composition. But while the mind of our young philosopher was principally occupied with the pursuits which we have now detailed, it was not inattentive to the move- ments of the celestial bodies, on which he was des- tined to throw such a brilliant light. The imperfec- tions of his watei clock had probably directed his thoughts to the more accurate measure of time which the motion of the sun afforded. In the yard of the * Mr. Clark informed Dr. Stukely that the walls of the room in which Sir Isaac lodged were covered with charcoal drawings of birds, beasts, men, ships, and mathematical figures, ail of which were very well de- signed. 24 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. house where he lived, he traced the varying move- ments of that luminary upon the walls and roofs of the buildings, and by means of fixed pins he had marked out the hourly and half-hourly subdivisions. One of these dials, which went by the name of Isaac's <foz/,and was often referred to by the country people for the hour of the day, appears to have been drawn solely from t"Lo observations of several years ; but we are not informed whether all the dials *which he drew on the wall of his house at Woolsthorpe, and which existed after his death, were of the same description, or were projected from his knowledge of the doctrine of the sphere. > Upon the death of the Reverend Mr. Smith in the year 1656, his widow left the rectory of North Witham, and took up her residence at Woolsthorpe along with her three children, Mary, Benjamin, and Hannah* Smith. Newton had now attained the fifteenth year of his age, and had made great pro- gress in his studies ; and as he was thought capable of being useful in the management of the farm and country business at Woolsthorpe, his mother, chiefly from a motive of economy, recalled him from the school at Grantham. In order to accustom him to the art of selling and buying, two of the most im- portant branches of rural labour, he was frequently sent on Saturday to Grantham market to dispose of grain and other articles of farm produce, and to purchase such necessaries as the family required. As he had yet acquired no experience, an old trust- worthy servant generally accompanied him on these errands. The inn which they patronised was the Saracen's Head at West Gate ; but no sooner had they put tip their horses than our young philosopher deserted his commercial concerns, and betook him- self to his former lodging in the apothecary's garret, where a number of Mr. Clark's old books afforded him abundance of entertainment till his aged guar- dian had executed the family commissions, and a& PREPARATION FOR THE UNIVERSITY. 2 nounced to him the necessity of returning. At other times he deserted his duties at an earlier stage, and intrenched himself under a hedge by the way-side, where he continued his studies till the servant re- turned from Grantham. The more immediate affairs of the farm were not more prosperous under his management than would have been his marketings at Grantham. The perusal of a book, the execu- tion of a model, or the superintendence of a water- wheel of his own construction, whirling the glitter- ing spray from some neighbouring stream, absorbed all his thoughts when the sheep were going astray, and the cattle were devouring or treading down the corn. Mrs. Smith was soon convinced from experience that her son was not destined to cultivate the soil, and as his passion for study, and his dislike for every other occupation increased with his years, s?ie wisely resolved to give him all the advantages which edu- cation could confer^ He was accordingly sent back to Grantham school, where he continued for some months in busy preparation for his academical stu- dies. His uncle, the Reverend W. Ayscough, who was rector of Burton Goggles, about three miles east of Woolsthorpe, and who had himself studied at Trinity College, recommended to his nephew to enter that society, and it was accordingly determined that he should proceed to Cambridge at the ap- proaching term.* * " One of his uncles," says M. Biot, " having one day found him under a hedge with a book in his hand and entirely absorbed in medita- tion, took it from him, and found that he was occupied in the solution of a mathematical problem. Struck with finding so serious and so active a disposition at so early an age, he urged his mother no longer to thwart iHm, and to send him back to Grantham to continue his studies." I hsve omitted this anecdote in the text, as I cannot find it in Tumor's Collections, from which M. Biot derived his details of Newton's infancy, Ifc»r in any other work. c 26 SIR ISAAC NEWf ON. CHAPTER II. fffwton enters Trinity College, Cambridge—Origin of his Propensity for Mathematics— He studies the Geometry ofDetcartes unassisted—- Purchases a Prism — Revises Dr. Harrow's Optical Lectures — Dr Barrow's Opinion respecting Colours.— Takes his Degrees — Is ap- pointed a Fellow of Trinity College —Succeeds Dr. Barrow in the Lucasian Chair of Mathematics. To a young mind thirsting for knowledge, and ambitious of the distinction which it brings, the transitibn from a village school to a university like that of Cambridge, — from the absolute solitude of thought to the society of men imbued with all the literature and science of the age, — must be one of eventful interest. To Newton it was a source of peculiar excitement. The history of science affords many examples where the young aspirant had been early initiated into her mysteries, and had even ex- ercised his powers of invention and discovery before he was admitted within the walls of a college ; but he who was to give philosophy her laws did not exhibit such early talent ; no friendly counsel regulated his youthful studies, and no work of scientific eminence seems to have guided him in his course. In yield- ing to the impulse of his mechanical genius, his mind obeyed the laws of its own natural expansion, and, following the line of least resistance, it was thus drawn aside from the strongholds with which it was destined to grapple. When Newton, therefore, arrived at Trinity Col- lege, he brought with him a more slender portion of science than falls to the lot of ordinary scholars ; but this state of his acquirements was perhaps not unfavourable to the development of his powers. Unexhausted by premature growth, and invigorated by healthful repose, his mind was the better fitted to TRINITY COLLEGE. 27 make those vigorous and rapid shoots which soon covered with foliage and with fruit the genial soil to which it had been transferred. ^•Cambridge was consequently the real birthplace of Newton's genius. Her teachers fostered his ear- liest studies ; — her institutions sustained his mightiest efforts ; — and within her precincts were all his dis- coveries made and perfected. When he was called to higher official functions, his disciples kept up the pre-eminence of their master's philosophy, and their successors have maintained this seat of learning in, the fulness of its glory, and rendered it the most distinguished among the universities of Europe. It was on the 5th of June, 1660, in the 18th year of his age, that Newton was admitted into Trinity College, Cambridge, during the same year that Dr. Barrow was elected professor of Greek in the uni- versity. His attention was first turned to the study of mathematics by a desire to inquire into the truth of judicial astrology ; and he is said to have dis- covered the folly of that study by erecting a figure with the aid of one or two of the problems of Euclid. The propositions contained in this ancient system of geometry he regarded as self-evident truths ; and without any preliminary study he made himself master of Descartes's Geometry by his genius and patient application. This neglect of the elementary truths of geometry he afterward regarded as a mistake in his mathematical studies, and he ex- pressed to Dr. Pemberton his regret that " he had ap- plied himself to the works of Descartes, and other alge- oraic writers, before he had considered the elements of Euclid with that attention which so excellent a writer deserved.* Dr. Wallis's Arithmetic of Infinites, ^aunderson's Logic, and the Optics of Kepler were among the books which he had studied with care. On these works he wrote comments during their perusal $ * Pemberton's View of Sir Isaac Newton1 s Philosophy. Pref. _, 28 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. and so great was his progress, that he is reported to have found himself more deeply versed in some branches of knowledge than the tutor who directed his studies. Neither history nor tradition has handed down to us any particular account of his progress during the first three years that he spent at Cambridge. It appears from a statement of his expenses, that in 1664 he purchased a prism, for the purpose, as has been said, of examining rtescartes's theory of co- lours ; and it is stated by Mr. Conduit, that he soon established his own views on the subject, and de- tected the errors in those of the French philosopher. This, however, does not seem to have been the case. Had he discovered the composition of light in 1664 or 1665, it is not likely that he would have withheld it, not only from the Royal Society, but from his own friends at Cambridge till the year 1671. His friend and tutor, Dr. Barrow, was made Lucasian Professor of Mathematics in 1663, and the optical lectures which he afterward delivered were published in 1669. In the preface of this work he acknow- ledges his obligations to his colleague, Mr. Isaac Newton,* for having revised the MSS., and corrected several oversights, and made some important sug- gestions. In the twelfth lecture there are some ob- servations on the nature and origin of colours, which Newton could not have permitted his friend to publish had he been then in possession of their true theory. According to Dr. Barrow, White is that which discharges a copious light equally clear in eveiy direction; Black is that which does not emit light at all, or which does it very sparingly. Red is that which emits a light more clear than usual, but interrupted by shady interstices. Blue is that which discharges a rarified light, as in bodies which consist of white and black particles arranged * Peregregiae vir indolls ac insignia peritiee.— Epist ad. Lect APPOINTED PROFESSOR ~OF MATHEMATICS. 29 alternately. Green is nearly allied to blue. Yellow is a mixture of much white and a little red; and Purple consists of a great deal of blue mixed with a small portion of red. . The blue colour of the sea arises from the whiteness of the salt which it con- tains, mixed with tjie blackness of the pure water in which the salt is dissolved ; and the blueness of the shadows of bodies, seen at the same time by candle and daylight, arises from the whiteness of the paper mixed with the faint light or blackness of the twilight. These opinions savour so little of genuine philosophy that they must have attracted the observation of Newton, and had he discovered at that time that white was a mixture of all the colours, and black a privation of them all, he could not have permitted the absurd speculations of his ! master to pass uncorrected. That Newton had not distinguished himself by ! any positive discovery so early as 1664 or 1665, may ! be inferred also from the circumstances which at- ! tended the competition for the law fellowship of j Trinity College. The candidates for this appoint- | ment were himself and Mr. Robert Uvedale ; and j Dr. Barrow, then Master of Trinity, having found j them perfectly equal in their attainments, con- ! ferred the fellowship on Mr. Uvedale as the senior I candidate. In the books of the university, Newton is recorded j as having been admitted sub-sizer in 1661. He ! became a scholar in 1664. In 1665 he took his de- gree of Bachelor of Arts, and in 1666, in conse- quence of the breaking out of the plague, he retired to Woolsthorpe. In 1667 he was made Junior Fel- low. In 1668 he took his degree of Master of Arts, and in the same year he was appointed to a Senior Fellowship. In 1669, when Dr. Barrow had re- solved to devote his attention to theology, he re- signed the Lucasian Professorship of Mathematics in favour of Newton, who may now be considered C2 30 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. as having entered upon that brilliant career of dis- covery the history of which will form the subject of some of the following chapters. CHAPTER III. Newton occupied in grinding Hyperbolical Lenses— His first Experi- ments with the Prism made in 1666 — He discovers the Composition of White Light, and the different Refrangibility of the Rays which com- pose it— Abandons his Attempts to improve Refracting Telescopes and resolves to attempt the Construction of Reflecting ones — He quits Cam- bridge on account of the Plague — Constructs two Reflecting Telescopes in 1668, the first, ever executed— One of them examined by the Royal So- ciety, and shown to the King — He constructs a Telescope with Glass Specula— Recent History of the Reflecting Telescope— Mr. Airy's Glass Specula— Hadleifs Reflecting Telescopes— Short's— HerscheCs — Ramage's — Lord Oxmantowrts. THE appointment of Newton to the Lucasian chair at Cambridge seems to have been coeval with his grandest discoveries. The first of these of which the date is well authenticated is that of the different refrangibility of the rays of light, which he established in 1666. The germ of the doctrine of universal gravitation seems to have presented itself to him in the same year, or at least in 1667 • and uin the year 1666 or before"* he was in possession of his method of fluxions, and he had brought it to such a state in the beginning of 1669, that he permitted Dr. Barrow to communicate it to Mr. Collins on the 20th of June in that year. Although we have already mentioned, on the au- thority of a written memorandum of Newton him self, that he purchased a prism at Cambridge in 1664, yet he does not appear to have made any use of it, as he informs us that it was in 1666 that he "pro- * See Newton's Letter to the Abbe Conti, dated February 26, 1715-lft hi the Additamenta Comm. Epistotici. REFRACTING TELESCOPE. 31 cured a triangular glass prism to try therewith the celebrated phenomena of colours."* During that year he had applied himself to the grinding of " op- tic glasses, of other figures than spherical," and having, no doubt, experienced the impracticability of executing such lenses, the idea of examining the phenomena of colour was one of those sagacious and fortunate impulses which more than once led him to discovery. Descartes in his Dioptrice, pub- lished in 1629, and more recently James Gregory in his Optica Promota published in 1663, had shown that parallel and diverging rays could be reflected or refracted, with mathematical accuracy, to a point or focus, by giving the surface a parabolic, an elliptical, or a hyperbolic form, or some other form not spher- ical. Descartes had even invented and described machines by which lenses of these shapes could be ground and polished, and the perfection of the re- fracting telescope was supposed to depend on the degree of accuracy with which they could be exe- cuted. In attempting to grind glasses that were not spher- ical, Newton seems to have conjectured that the de- fects of lenses, and consequently of refracting tele- scopes, might arise from some other cause than the imperfect convergency of rays to a single point, and this conjecture was happily realized in those fine discoveries of which we shall now endeavour to give some account. ! When Newton began this inquiry, philosophers of the highest genius were directing all the energies of their mind to the subject of light, and to the im- provement of the refracting telescope. James Gregory of Aberdeen had invented his reflecting telescope. Descartes had explained the theory and exerted himself in perfecting the construction of the common refracting telescope, and Huygens had not • Newtoni Opera, torn, iv. p. 205, Letter to Oldenburg. 32 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. only executed the magnificent instruments by which he discovered the ring and the satellites of Saturn, but had begun those splendid researches respecting the nature of light, and the phenomena of double refraction, which have led his successors to such brilliant discoveries. Newton, therefore, arose when the science of light was ready for some great ac- cession, and at the precise time when he was re- quired to propagate the impulse which it had received from his illustrious predecessors. The ignorance which then prevailed respecting the nature and origin of colours is sufficiently ap- parent from the account we have already given of Dr. Barrow's speculations on this subject. It was always supposed that light of every colour was equally refracted or bent out of its direction when it passed through any lens or prism, or other refract- ing medium ; and though the exhibition of colours by the prism had been often made previous to the time of Newton, yet no philosopher seems to have attempted to analyze the phenomena. When he had procured his triangular glass prism, a section of which is shown at ABC, (fig. 1,) he Fig. 1. made a hole H in one of his window-shutters, SHT and having darkened his chamber, he let in a con- venient quantity of the sun's light RR, which, pass- EXPERIMENTS ON COLOURS. 33 ing through the prism ABC, was so refracted as to exhibit all the different colours on the wall at MN, forming an image about five times as long as it was broad. "It was at first," says our author, "a very pleasing divertisement to view the vivid and intense colours produced thereby," but this pleasure was immediately succeeded by surprise at various circum- stances which he had not expected. According to the received laws of refraction, he expected the image MN to be circular, like the white image at W, which the sunbeam RR had formed on the wall previous to the interposition of the prism ; but when he found it to be no less than five times larger than its breadth, it "excited in him a more than ordinary curiosity to examine from whence it might proceed. He could scarcely think that the various thickness of the glass, or the termination with shadow or dark- ness, could have any influence on light to produce such an effect: yet he thought it not amiss first to examine those circumstances, and so find what would happen by transmitting light through parts of the glass of divers thicknesses, or through holes in the window of divers bignesses, or by setting the prism without (on the other side of ST), so that the light might pass through it and be refracted before it was termi- nated by the hole ; but he found none of these cir- cumstances material. The fashion of the colours was in all those cases the same." Newton next suspected that some unevenness in the glass, or other accidental irregularity, might cause the dilatation of the colours. In order to try this, he took another prism BCB', and placed it in such a manner that the light RRW passing through them both might be refracted contrary ways, and thus returned by BCB' into that course RRW, from which the prism ABC had diverted it, for by this means he thought the regular effects of the prism ABC would be destroyed by the prism BCB, and the irregular ones more augmented by the multiplicity 34 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. of refractions. The result was, that the light which was diffused by the first prism ABC into an oblong form, was reduced by the second prism BCB' into a circular one W, with as much regularity as when it did not pass through them at all; so that whatever was the cause of the length of the image MN, it did not arise from any irregularity in the prism. Our author next proceeded to examine more critic- ally what might be effected by the difference of the incidence of "the rays proceeding from different parts of the sun's disk ; but by taking accurate measures of the lines and angles, he found that the angle of the emergent rays should be 31 minutes equal to the sun's diameter, whereas the real angle subtended by MN at the hole H was 2° 49'. But as this computa- tion was founded on the hypothesis, that the sine of the angle of incidence was proportional to the sine of the angle of refraction, which from his own ex- perience he could not imagine to be so erroneous as to make that angle but 31', which was in reality 2° 49', yet " his curiosity caused him again to take up his prism" ABC, and having turned it round in both directions, so as to make the rays RR fall both with greater and with less obliquity upon the face AC, he found that the colours on the wall did not sensibly change their place ; and hence he obtained a decided proof that they could not be occasioned by a differ- ence in the incidence of the light radiating from dif- ferent parts of the sun's disk. Newton then began to suspect that the rays, after passing through the prism, might move in curve lines, and, in proportion to the different degrees of curva- ture, might tend to different parts of the wall; and this suspicion was strengthened by the recollection that he had often seen a tennis-ball struck with an oblique racket describe such a curve line. In this case a circular and a progressive motion is commu- nicated to the ball by the stroke, and in consequence of this, the direction of its motion was curvilineal, sot1 EXPERIMENTS ON COLOURS. 35 so that if the rays of light were globular bodies, they might acquire a circulating motion by their ob- ilique passage out of one medium into another, and thus move like the tennis-ball in a curve line. Not- withstanding, however, "this plausible ground of suspicion," he could discover no such curvature in their direction, and, what was enough for his pur- Eose, he observed that the difference between the ?ngth MN of the image, and the diameter of the !hole H, was proportional to their distance HM, which could not have happened had the rays moved in curvilineal paths. These different hypotheses, or suspicions, as New- jton calls them, being thus gradually removed, he was at length led to an experiment which deter- mined beyond a doubt the true cause of the elonga- tion of the coloured image. Having taken a board with a small hole in it, he placed it behind the face BC of the prism, and close to it, so that he could transmit through the hole any one of the colours in MN, and keep back all the rest. When the hole, for example, was near C, no other light but the red fell upon the wall at N. He then placed behind N another board with a hole in it, and behind this board he placed another prism, so as to receive the red light at N, which passed through this hole in the second board. He then turned round the first prism ABC so as to make all the colours pass in succession through these two holes, and he marked their places on the wall. From the variation of these places, he saw that the red rays at N were less refracted by the second prism than the orange rays, the orange less than the yellow, and so on, the violet being more refracted than all the rest. Hence he drew the grand conclusion, that light leas not homogeneous, but consisted of rays, some of which were more refrangible than others. As soon as this important truth was established, Sir Isaac saw that a lens which refracts light exactly 36 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. like a prism must also refract the differently colourec rays with different degrees of force, bringing the violet rays to a focus nearer the glass than the rec rays. This is shown in Jig. 2, where LL is a con vex lens, and S, L, SL rays of the sun falling upon i Fig. 2. M M in parallel directions. The violet rays existing in the white light SL being more refrangible than the rest, will be more refracted or bent, and will meet al V, foiming there a violet image of the sun. In like manner the yellow rays will form an image of the sun at Y, and so on, the red rays, which are the least refrangible, being brought to a focus at R, and there forming a red image of the sun. Hence, if we suppose LL to be the object-glass of a telescope directed to the sun, and MM an eye-glass through which the eye at E sees magnified the image or picture of the sun formed by LL, it cannot see| distinctly all the different images between R and V. If it is adjusted so as to see distinctly the yellow ima^e at Y, as it is in the figure, it will not see dis- tinctly either the red or violet images, nor indeed any of them but the yellow one. There will conse- quently be a distinct yellow image, with indistinct images of all the other colours, producing great cone- fusion and indistinctness of vision. As soon as Sir Isaac perceived this result of his discovery, he aban- doned his attempts to improve the refracting tele- IMPERFECTIONS OF TELESCOPES. 37 •scope, and took into consideration the principle of re- jection; and as he found that rays of all colours were reflected regularl) , so that the angle of reflec- tion was equal to the angle of incidence, he con- pluded that, upon this principle, optical instruments Plight be brought to any degree of perfection imaginable, [provided a reflecting substance could be found which 3ould polish as finely as glass, and reflect as much light as glass transmits, and provided a method of :ommunicating to it a parabolic figure could be ob- tained. These difficulties, however, appeared to him very great, and he even thought them insuperable when he considered that, as any irregularity in a re- lecting surface makes the rays deviate five or six times more from their true path than similar irregu- .arities in a refracting surface, a much greater de- gree of nicety would be required in figuring reflect- ing specula than refracting lenses. Such was the progress of Newton's optical dis- coveries, when he was forced to quit Cambridge in 1666 by the plague which then desolated England, and more than two years elapsed before he pro- ceeded any farther. In 1668 he resumed the inquiry, and having thought of a delicate method of polish- ng, proper (for metals, by which, as he conceived, 'the figure would be corrected to the last," he began ;o put this method to the test of experiment. At ,his time he was acquainted with the proposal of Mr. James Gregory, contained in his Optica Promota, o construct a reflecting telescope with two concave specula, the largest of which had a hole in the middle of the larger speculum, to transmit the light o an eye-glass;* but he conceived that it would be * M. Biot, in his Life of Newton, has stated that Newton was pre- ceded in the invention of the reflecting telescope by Gregory, but proba- Ay without knowing it. It is quite certain, however, that Newton was icquainted with Gregory's invention, as appears from the following avowal of it. " When I first applied myself to try the effects of reflec- tion, Mr. Gregory's Optica Promota (printed in the year 1663) having fallen into my hands, where there is an instrument described with a hole 38 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. an improvement on this instrument to place the eye* glass at the side of the tube, and to reflect the rays to it by an oval plane speculum. One of these instruments he actually executed with his own hands ; and he gave an account of it in a letter to a friend, dated February 23d, 1668-9, a letter which is also remarkable for containing the first allusion to his discoveries respecting colours. Previous to this he was in correspondence on the subject with Mr. Ent, afterward Sir George Ent, one of the original council of the Royal Society, an eminent medical writer of his day, and President of the College of- Physicians. In a letter to Mr. Ent he had promised an account of his telescope to their mutual friend, and the letter to which we now allude contained tne fulfilment of that promise. The telescope was six inches long. It bore an aperture in the large specu- lum something more than an inch, and as the eye- glass was a plano-convex lens, whose focal length was one-sixth or one-seventh of an inch, it magni- fied about forty times, which, as Newton remarks, was more than any six-foot tube (meaning refracting telescopes) could do with distinctness. On account of the badness of the materials, however, and the want of a good polish, it represented objects less distinct than a six-feet tube, though h3 still thought it would be equal to a three or four feet tube di- rected to common objects. He had seen through it Jupiter distinctly with his four satellites, and also the horns or moon-like phases of Venus, though this last phenomenon required some niceness in adjusting the instrument. Although Newton considered this little instru- in the midst of fne object-glass, to transmit the light to an eye-glass placed behind it, I had thence an occasion of considering that sort of con- struction, and found their disadvantages so great, that I saw it necessary before I attempted any thing in the practice to alter the design of them and place the eye-glass at the side of the tube rather than at the middle. REFLECTING TELESCOPE. 89, it as in itself contemptible, yet he regarded it as an u epitome of what might be done ;" and he ex- pressed his conviction that a six-feet telescope might be made after this method, which would perform as well as a sixty or a hundred feet telescope made in the common way; and that if a common refracting ;elescope could be made of the "purest glass exqui- sitely polished, with the best figure that any geo- metrician (Descartes, &c.) hath or can design," it would scarcely perform better than a common tele- scope. This, he adds, may seem a paradoxical as- iertion, yet he continues, " it is the necessary con- sequence of some experiments which I have made concerning the nature of light." • The telescope now described possesses a very pe- culiar interest, as being the first reflecting one which was ever executed and directed to the heavens, ames Gregory, indeed, had attempted, in 1664 or 665, to construct his instrument. He employed Messrs. Rives and Cox, who were celebrated glass- Tinders of that time, to execute a concave speculum f six feet radius, and likewise a small one; but as hey had failed in polishing the large one, and as Mr. ~ regory was on the eve of going abroad, he troubled limself no farther about the experiment, and the ube of the telescope was never made. Some time afterward, indeed, he " made some trials both with a ittle concave and convex speculum," but, "pos^- iessed with the fancy of the defective figure, hi would not be at the pains to fix every thing in its due Listance." Such were the earliest attempts to construct the eflecting telescope, that noble instrument which las since effected such splendid discoveries in as- ronomy. Looking back from the present advanced itate of practical science, how great is the contrast >etween the loose specula of Gregory and the fine Gregorian telescopes of Hadley, Short, and Veitch, -—between the humble six-inch tube of Newton and the gigantic instruments of Herschel and Ramage. 40 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. The success of this first experiment inspired New- ton with fresh zeal, and though his mind was now occupied with his optical discoveries, with the ele- ments of his method of fluxions, and with the ex- panding germ of his theory of universal gravitation, yet with all the ardour of youth he applied himself to the laborious operation of executing another re- flecting telescope with his own hands. This instru- ment, which was better than the first, though it lay by him several years, excited some interest at Cam- bridge ; and Sir Isaac himself informs us, that one of the fellows of Trinity College had completed a telescope of the same kind, which he considered as somewhat superior to his own. The existence of these telescopes having become known to the Royal Society, Newton was requested to send his instru- ment for examination to that learned body. He ac- cordingly transmitted it to Mr. Oldenburg in Decem- ber, 1671, and from this epoch his name began to acquire that celebrity by which it has been so pecu- liarly distinguished. On the llth of January, 1672, it was announced to the Royal Society that his reflecting telescope had been shown to the king, and had been examined "by the president, Sir Robert Moray, Sir Paul Neale, Sir Christopher Wren, and Mr, Hook. These gen- tlemen entertained so high an opinion of it, that, in qjder to secure the honour of the contrivance to its author, they advised the inventor to send a drawing and description of it to Mr. Huygens at Paris. Mr. Oldenburg accordingly drew up a description of it in Latin, which, after being corrected by Mr. New- ton, was transmitted to that eminent philosopher. This telescope, of which the annexed is an accurate drawing, is carefully preserved in the library of the Royal Society of London, with the following in- scription : — " Invented by Sir Isaac Newton and made with his own hands 1671." REFLECTING TELESCOPES. 41 42 SIR ISAAC NEWTOX. It does not appear that Newton executed any other reflecting telescopes than the two we have mentioned. He informs us that he repolished and greatly im- proved a fourteen-feet object-glass, executed by a London artist, and having proposed in 1678 to sub- stitute glass reflectors in place of metallic specula, he tried to make a reflecting telescope on this principle four feet long, and with a magnifying power of 150. The glass was wrought by a London artist, and though it seemed well finished, yet, when it was quicksilvered on its convex side, it exhibited all over the glass innumerable inequalities, which gave an indistinctness to every object. He expresses, how- ever, his conviction that nothing but good work- manship is wanting to perfect these telescopes, and he recommends their consideration " to the curious in figuring glasses." For a period of fifty years this recommendation excited no notice. At last Mr. James Short of Edinburgh, an artist of consummate skill, executed about the year 1730 no fewer than six reflecting telescopes with glass specula, three of fifteen inches, and three of nine inches in focal length. He found it extremely troublesome to give them a true figure with parallel surfaces ; and several of them when finished turned out useless, in consequence of the veins which then appeared in the glass. Although these instruments performed remarkably well, yet the light was fainter than he expected, and from this cause, combined with the difficulty of finishing them, he afterward devoted his labours solely to those with metallic specula. At a later period, in 1822, Mr. G. B. Airy of Trinity College, and one of the distinguished suc- cessors of Newton in the Lucasian chair, resumed the consideration of glass specula, and demonstrated that the aberration both of figure and of colour might be corrected in these instruments. Upon this ingenious principle Mr. Airy executed more than REFLECTING TELESCOPES. 43 one telescope, but though the result of the experi- ment was such as to excite hopes of ultimate suc- cess, yet the construction of such instruments is still a desideratum in practical science. Such were the attempts which Sir Isaac Newton made to construct reflecting telescopes ; but notwith- standing the success of his labours, neither the phi- losopher nor the practical optician seems to have had courage to pursue them. A London artist, in- deed, undertook to imitate these instruments ; but Sir Isaac informs us, that " he fell much short of what he had attained, as he afterward understood by discoursing with the under workmen he had em- ployed." After a long period of fifty years, John Hadley, Esq. of Essex, a Fellow of the Royal So- ciety, began in 1719 or 1720 to execute a reflecting telescope. His scientific knowledge and his manual dexterity fitted him admirably for such a task, and, probably after many failures, he constructed two large telescopes about five feet three inches long, one of which, with a speculum six inches in diameter, was presented to the Royal Society in 1723. The celebrated Dr. Bradley and the Rev. Mr. Pound compared it with the great Huygenian refractor 123 feet long. It bore as high a magnifying power as the Huygenian telescope : it showed objects equally distinct, though not altogether so clear and bright, and it exhibited every celestial object that had been discovered by Huygens, — the five satellites of Sat- urn, the shadow of Jupiter's satellites on his disk, the black list in Saturn's ring, and the edge of his shadow cast on the ring. Encouraged and instructed by Mr. Hadley, Dr. Bradley began the construction of reflecting telescopes, and succeeded so well that he wo Aid have completed one of them, had he not been obliged to change his residence. Some time afterward he and the Honourable Samuel Molyneux undertook the task together at Kew, and attempted to execute specula about twenty-six inches in focal 44 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. length ; but notwithstanding Dr. Bradley's former experience, and Mr. Hadley's frequent instructions, it was a long time before they succeeded. The first good instrument which they finished was in May, 1724. It was twenty-six inches in focal length ; but they afterward completed a very large one of eight feet, the largest that had ever been made. The first of these instruments was afterward elegantly fitted up by Mr. Molyneux, and presented to Ins majesty John V. King of Portugal. The great object of these two able astronomers was to reduce the method of making specula to such a degree of certainty that they could be manu- factured for public sale. Mr. Hauksbee had indeed made a good one about three and a half feet long, and had proceeded to the execution of two others, one of six feet, and another of twelve feet in focal length ; but Mr. Scarlet and Mr. Hearne, having re- ceived all the information which Mr. Molyneux had acquired, constructed them for public sale ; and the reflecting telescope has ever since been an article of trade with every regular optician. As Sir Isaac Newton was at this time President of the Royal Society, he had the high satisfaction of seeing his own invention become an instrument of public use, and of great advantage to science, and he no doubt felt the full influence of this triumph of his skill. Still, however, the reflecting telescope had not achieved any new discovery in the heavens. The latest accession to astronomy had been made Dy the ordinary refractors of Huygens, labouring under all the imperfections of coloured light ; and this long pause in astronomical discovery seemed to indicate that man had carried to its farthest limits his power of penetrating into the depths of the uni- verse. This, however, was only one of those sta- tionary positions from which human genius takes a new and a loftier elevation. While the English op- ticians were thus practising the recent art of grinding DR. HEUSCHEL'S TELESCOPES. 45 specula, Mr. James Short of Edinburgh was devot- ing to the subject all the energies of his youthful mind. In 1732, and in the 22d year of his age, he began his labours, and he carried to such high per- fection the art of grinding and polishing specula, and of giving them the true parabolic figure, that, with. a telescope fifteen inches in focal length, he read in the Philosophical Transactions at the distance of 500 feet, and frequently saw the five satellites of Saturn together, — a power which was beyond the reach even of Hadley's six-feet instrument. The celebrated Maclaurin compared the telescopes of Short with those made b}^ the best London artists, and so great was their superiority, that his small telescopes were invariably superior to larger ones from London. In 1742, after he had settled as an optician in the metropolis, he executed for Lord Thomas Spencer a reflecting telescope, twelve feet in focal length, for 630/. ; in 1752 he completed one for the King of Spain, at the expense of 1200/. ; and a short time before his death, which took place in 1768, he finished the specula of the large telescope which was mounted equatorially for the observatory of Edinburgh by his brother Thomas Short, who was offered twelve hundred guineas for it by the King of Denmark. Although the superiority of these instruments, which were all of the Gregorian form, demonstrated the value of the reflecting telescope, yet no skilful hand had yet directed it to the heavens ; and it was reserved for Dr. Herschel to employ it as an instru- ment of discovery, to exhibit to the eye of man new worlds and new systems, and to bring within the grasp of his reason those remote regions of space to which his imagination even had scarcely ventured to extend its power. So early as 1774 he completed a five-feet Newtonian reflector, and he afterward executed no fewer than two hundred 7 feet, one hun- dred and fifty 10 feet, and eighty 20 feet specula. In "46 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. 1781 he began a reflector thirty feet long, and having a speculum thirty-six inches in diameter ; and under the munificent patronage of George III. he com- pleted, in 1789, his gigantic instrument forty feet long, with a speculum forty-nine and a half inches in diameter. The genius and perseverance which created instruments of such traiiscendant magnitude were not likely to terminate with their construction. In the examination of the starry heavens, the ulti- mate object of his labours. Dr. Herschel exhibited the same exalted qualifications, and in a few years he rose from the level of humble life to the enjoy- ment of a name more glorious than that of the sages and warriors of ancient times, and as immortal as the objects with which it will be for ever associated. Nor was it in the ardour of the spring of life that these triumphs of reason were achieved. Dr. Her- schel had reached the middle of his course before his career of discovery began, and it was in the au- tumn and winter of his days that he reaped the full harvest of his glory. The discovery of a new planet at the verge of the solar system was the first trophy of his skill, and new double and multiple stars, and new nebulae, and groups of celestial bodies were added in thousands to the system of the universe. The spring-tide of knowledge which was thus let in upon the human mind continued for a while to spread its waves over Europe ; but when it sank to its ebb in England, there was no other bark left upon the strand but that of the Deucalion of Science, whose home had been so long upon its waters. During the life of Dr. Herschel, and during the reign, and within the dominions of his royal patron, four new planets were added to the solar system, but they were detected by telescopes of ordinary power ; and we venture to state, that since the reign of George III no attempt has been made to keep up the continuity of Dr. Herschel's discoveries. Mr. Herschel, his distinguished son, has indeed ELECTED INTO THE ROYAL SOCIETY. 47 c» **pleted more than one telescope of considerable size ; Mr. Ramage, of Aberdeen, has executed re- flectors rivalling almost those of Slough ; — and Lord Oxmantown, an Irish nobleman of high promise, is now engaged on an instrument of great size. But what avail the enthusiasm and the efforts of indi- vidual minds in the intellectual rivalry of nations ? When the proud science of England pines in obscu- rity, blighted by the absence of the royal favour, and of the nation's sympathy; — when its chivalry fall unwept and unhonoured ; — how can it sustain the conflict against the honoured and marshalled genius of foreign lands ? CHAPTER IV. He delivers a Course of. Optical Lectures at Cambridge — Is elected Fellow of the Royal Society — He communicates to them his Discoveries on the different Refrangibility and Nature of Light—Popular Account of them— They involve him in various Controversies— His Dispute with Pardies — Linus — Lucas — Dr. Hooke and Mr. Huygens—Th* Influence of these Disputes on the Mind of Newton. ALTHOUGH Newton delivered a course of lectures on optics in the University of Cambridge in the years 1669, 1670, and 1671, containing his principal discoveries relative to the different refrangibility of light, yet it is a singular circumstance, that these discoveries should not have become public through the conversation or correspondence of his pupils. The Royal Society had acquired no knowledge of them till the beginning of 1672, and his reputation ; in that body was founded chiefly on his reflecting ' telescope. On the 23d December, 1671, the cele- brated Dr. Seth Ward, Lord Bishop of Sarum, who • was the author of several able works on astronomy, and had filled the astronomical chair at Oxford, proposed Mr. Newton as a Fellow of the Royal 48 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. Society. The satisfaction which he derived from this circumstance appears to have been considerable ; and in a letter to Mr. Oldenburg, of the 6th January, he says, " I am very sensible of the honour done me by the Bishop of Sarum in proposing me a can- didate ; and which, I hope, will be further conferred upon me by my election into the Society ; and if so, I shall endeavour to testify my gratitude, by communicating what my poor and solitary endeav- ours can effect towards the promoting your philo- sophical designs." His election accordingly took place on the llth January, the same day on which the Society agreed to transmit a description of his telescope to Mr. Huygens at Paris. The notice of his election, and the thanks of the Society for the communication of his telescope, were conveyed in the same letter, with an assurance that the Society " would take care that all right should be done him in the matter of this invention." In his next letter to Oldenburg, written on the 18th January, 1671-2, he announces his optical discoveries in the following remarkable manner : " 1 desire that in your next letter you would inform me for what time the So- ciety continue their weekly meetings ; because if they continue them for any time, I am purposing them, to be considered of and examined, an account of a philosophical discovery which induced me to the making of the said telescope ; and I doubt not but will prove much more grateful than the communica- tion of that instrument ; being in my judgment the oddest, if not the most considerable detection which hath hitherto been made in the operations of nature." This " considerable detection" was the discovery of the different refrangibility of the rays of light which we ^ave already explained, and which led to the construction of his reflecting telescope. It was communicated to the Royal Society in a letter to Mr. Oldenburg, dated February 6th, and excited great interest among its members. The "solemn COMMUNICATES HIS DISCOVERIES. 49 thanks" of the meeting were ordered to be trans- mitted to its author for his "very ingenious dis- course." A desire was expressed to have it imme- diately printed, both for the purpose of having it well considered by philosophers, and for " securing the considerable notices thereof to the author against the arrogations of others ;" and Dr. Seth Ward, Bishop of Salisbury, Mr. Boyle, and Dr. Hooke were desired to peruse and consider it, and to bring in a report upon it to the Society. The kindness of this distinguished body, and the anxiety which they had already evinced for his reputation, excited on the part of Newton a corres- ponding feeling, and he gladly accepted of their pro- posal to publish his discourse in the monthly num- bers in which the Transactions were then given to the world. " It was an esteem," says he,* " of the Royal Society for most candid and able judges in philosophical matters, encouraged me to present them with that discourse of light and colours, which since they have so favourably accepted of, I do ear- nestly desire you to return them my cordial thanks. I before thought it a great favour to be made a member of that honourable body; but I am now more sensible of .the advantages; for believe me, sir, I do not only esteem it a duty to concur with you in the promotion of real knowledge ; but a great privilege, that, instead of exposing discourses to a prejudiced and common multitude, (by which means many truths have been baffled and lost), I may with freedom apply myself to so jpdicious and impartial an assembly. A s to the printing of that letter, I am satisfied in theii judgment, or else I should have thought it too straight and narrow for public view. I designed it only to those that know how to im- prove upon hints of things ; and, therefore, to spare tediousness, omitted many such remarks and ex* * Letter to Oldenburg, February 10, 1671. E 50 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. periments as might be collected by considering the assigned laws of refractions ; some of which I be- lieve, with the generality of men, would yet be almost as taking as any I described. But yet, since the Royal Society have thought it fit to appear pub- licly, 1 leave it to their pleasure : and perhaps to supply the aforesaid defects, I may send you some more of the experiments to second it (if it be so thought fit), in the ensuing Transactions." Folio wing the order which Newton himself adopted, we have, in the preceding chapter, given an account of the leading doctrine of the different refrangibility of light, and of the attempts to improve the reflect- ing telescope which that discovery suggested. We shall now, therefore, endeavour to make the reader acquainted with the other discoveries respecting colours which he at this time communicated to the Royal Society. Having determined, by experiments already described, that a beam of white light, as emitted from the sun, consisted of seven different colours, which possess different degrees of refrangibility, he measured the re- lative extent of the coloured sp^es, and found them to have the propor- tions shown in Jig. 4, which rep- resents the prismatic spectrum, and , u hich is nothing more than an elon- gated image of the sun produced by the rays being separated in different degrees from their original direction, the red being refracted least, and the violet most powerfully. If we consider light as consisting of minute particles of matter, we may form some notion of its decomposi- tion by the prism from the following popular illustration. If we take steel Fig. 4. Orange Yellow Green Blue Indigo Violet DECOMPOSITION OF lIGHT. 51 filings of seven different degrees of fineness and mix them together, there are two ways in which we i may conceive the mass to be decomposed, or, what I is the same thing, all the seven different kinds of | filings separated from each other. By means of [seven sieves of different degrees of fineness, and so Imade that the finest will just transmit the finest powder and detain all the rest, while the next in fineness transmits the two finest powders and detains all the rest, and so on, it is obvious that all the pow- ders may be completely separated from each other. If we again mix all the steel filings, and laying them upon a table, hold high above them a flat bar magnet, so that none of the filings are attracted, then if we bring the magnet nearer and nearer, we shall come to a point where the finest filings are drawn up to it. These being removed, and the magnet brought nearer still, the next finest powders will be attracted, and so on till we have thus drawn out of the mass all the powders in a separate state. We may con- ceive the bar magnet to be inclined to the surface of the steel filings, and so moved over the mass, that at the end nearest to them the heaviest or coarsest will be attracted, and all the remotest and the finest or ligfflrer filings, while the rest are at- tracted to intermediate points, so that the seven different filings are not only separated, but are found adhering in separate patches to the surface of the flat magnet. The first of these methods, with the sieves, may represent the process of decomposing light, by which certain rays of white light are ab- sorbed, or stifled, or stopped in passing through bodies, while certain other rays are transmitted. The second method may represent the process of decomposing light by refraction, or by the attraction of certain rays farther from their original direction than other rays, and the different patches of filings upon the flat magnet may represent the spaces on the spectrum. 52 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. When a beam of white light is decomposed into the seven different colours of the spectrum, any particular colour, when once separated from the rest, is not susceptible of any change, or farther decomposition, whether it is refracted through prisms or reflected from mirrors. It may become fainter or brighter, but Newton never could, by any process, liter its colour or its refrangibility. Among the various bodies which act upon light, it is conceivable that there might have been some which acted least upon the violet rays and most upon the red rays. Newton, however, found that this never took place ; but that the same degree of refrangibility always belonged to the same colour, and the same colour to the same degree of refran- gibility. Having thus determined that the seven different colours of the spectrum were original or simple, he was led to the conclusion that whiteness or white light is a compound of all the seven colours of the spectrum, in the proportions in which they are rep- resented in Jig. 4. In order to prove this, or what is called the recomposition of white light out of the seven colours, he employed three different methods. When the beam RR was sepltated into its ele- mentary colours by the prism ABC, he received the RECOMPOSIT10N Of LIGHT. 53 Colours on another prism BOB', held either close to the first or a little behind it, and by the opposite re- fraction of this prism they were all refracted back into a beam of white light BW, which formed a white circular image on the wall at W, similar to what took place before any of the prisms were placed in its way. The other method of recomposing white light consisted in making the spectrum fall upon a lens at some distance from it. When a sheet of white paper was held behind the lens, and removed to a proper distance, the colours were all refracted into a circular spot, and so blended as to reproduce light so perfectly white as not to differ sensibly from the direct light of the sun. The last method of recomposing white light was one more suited^to vulgar apprehension. It con- sisted in attempting to compound a white by mix- ing the coloured powders used by painters. He was aware that such colours, from their very nature, could not compose a pure white ; but even this im- perfection in the experiment he removed by an in- genious device. Me accordingly mixed one part of red lead, four parts of blue bice, and a proper propor- tion of orpiment and verdigris. This mixture was dun, like wood newly cut, or like the human skin. He now took one-third of the mixture and rubbed it thickly on the floor of his room, where the sun shone upon it through the opened casement, and be- side it, in the shadow, he laid a piece of white paper of the same size. " Then going from them to the distance of twelve or eighteen feet, so that he could not discern the unevenness of the surface of the powder nor the little shadows let fall from the gritty particles thereof; the powder appeared intensely white, so as to transcend even the paper itself in whiteness." By adjusting the relative illumination of the powders and the paper, he was able to make them both appear of the very same degree 01 E2 64 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. whiteness. "For," says he, "when I was trying this, a friend coming to visit me, I stopped him at the door, and before I told him what the colours were, or what I was doing, I asked him which of the two whites were the best, and wherein they differed? And after he had at that distance viewed them well, he answered, that they were both good whites, and that he could not say which was best, nor wherein their colours differed." Hence Newton inferred that perfect whiteness may be compounded of different colours. As all the various shades of colour which appear in the material world can be imitated by intercept- ing certain rays in the spectrum, and uniting all the rest, and as bodies always appear of the same colour as the light in which they are placed, he concluded, that the colours of natural bodies are not qualities inherent in the bodies themselves, but arise from the disposition of the particles of each body to stop or absorb certain rays, and thus to reflect more copiously the rays which are not thus absorbed. No sooner were these discoveries given to the world than they were opposed with a degree of viru- lence and ignorance which have seldom been com- bined in scientific controversy. Unfortunately for Newton, the Royal Society contained few individuals of pre-eminent talent capable of appreciating the truth of his discoveries, and of protecting him against the shafts of his envious and ignorant assailants. This eminent body, while they held his labours in the highest esteem, were still of opinion that his discoveries were fair subjects of discussion, and their secretary accordingly communicated to him all the papers which were written in opposition to his views. The first of these was by a Jesuit named Ignatius Pardies, Professor of Mathematics at Cler- mont, who pretended that the elongation of the sun's image arose from the inequal incidence of the dif- ferent rays on the first face of the prism, although vv le bi CONTROVERSY WITH LINUS. 65 Newton Tiad demonstrated in his own discourse that this was not the case. In April, 1672, Newton trans- mitted to Oldenburg a decisive reply to the animad- versions of Pardies ; but, unwilling to be vanquished, this disciple of Descartes took up a fresh position, and maintained that the elongation of the spectrum /might be explained by the diffusion of light on the hypothesis of Grimaldi, or by the diffusion of undu- lations on the hypothesis of Hook. Newton again replied to these feeble reasonings ; but he contented himself with reiterating1 his original experiments, and confirming them by more popular arguments, and the vanquished Jesuit wisely quitted the field. Another combatant soon sprung up in the person of one Francis Linus, a pt^sician in Liege,* who, on the 6th October, 1674, addressed a letter to a friend in London, containing animadversions on Newton's doctrine of colours. He boldly affirms, that in a perfectly clear sky the image of the sun made by a prism is never elongated, and that the spectrum observed by Newton was not formed by the true sunbeams, but by rays proceeding from some bright cloud. In support of these assertions, he appeals to frequently repeated experiments on the refractions and reflections of light which he had exhibited thirty years before to Sir Kenelm Digby, " who took notes upon them ;" and he un- blushingly states, that, if Newton had used the same industry as he did, he would never have " taken so impossible a task in hand, as to explain the difference between the length and breadth of the spectrum by the received laws of refraction." When this letter was shown to Newton, he refused * This gentleman was the author of a paper in the Philosophical Transactions, entitled " Optical Assertions concerning the Rainbow." How such a paper could be published by so learned a body seems in the present day utterly incomprehensible. The dials which Linus erected at Liege, and which were the originals of those formerly in the Priory Gardens in London, are noticed in the Philosophical Transactions for 1703. In one of them the hours were distinguished by touch. 56 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. to answer it ; but a letter was sent to Linus referring him to the answer to Pardies, and assuring him that the experiments on the spectrum were made when there was no bright cloud in the heavens. This reply, however, did not satisfy the Dutch experi- mentalist. On the 25th February, 1675, he addressed another letter to his friend, in which he gravely attempts to prove that the experiment of Newton was not made in a clear day ; — that the prism was not close to the hole, — and that the length of the spectrum was not perpendicular, or parallel to the length of the prism. Such assertions could not but irritate even the patient mind of Newton. He more than once declined the earnest request of Oldenburg to answer these observations; he stated, that, as the dispute referred to matters of fact, it could only be decided before competent witnesses, and he referred to the testimony of those who had seen his experiments. The entreaties of Oldenburg, how- ever, prevailed over his own better judgment, and, "lest Mr. Linus should make the more stir," this great man was compelled to draw up a long and explanatory reply to reasonings utterly contempti- ble, and to assertions altogether unfounded. This answer, dated November 13th, 1675, could scarcely have been perused by Linus, who was dead on the 15th December, when his pupil Mr. Gascoigne, took up the gauntlet, and declared that Linus had shown to various persons in Liege the experiment which proved the spectrum to be circular, and that Sir Isaac could not be more confident on his side than they were on the other. He admitted, how- ever, that the different results might arise from dif- ferent ways of placing the prism. Pleased with the " handsome genius of Mr. Gascoigne's letter," New ton replied even to it, and suggested that the spec- trum seen by Linus may have been the circular one formed by one reflexion, or, what he thought more probable, the circular one formed by two refraction^ CONTROVERSY WITH LUCAS. 57 and one intervening reflection from the base of the prism, which would be coloured if the prism was | not an isosceles o^d. This suggestion seems to t have enlightened the Dutch philosophers. Mr. Gas- coigne, having no conveniences for making the ex- ( periments pointed out by Newton, requested Mr. Lucas of Liege to perform them in his own house. This ingenious individual, whose paper gave great satisfaction to Newton, and deserves the highest praise, confirmed the leading results of the English i philosopher ; but though the refracting angle of his prism was 60° and the refractions equal, he never could obtain a spectrum whose length was more thar. from three to three and a half times its breadth, while Newton found the length to be Jive times its breadth. In our author's reply, he directs his atten- tion principally to this point of difference. He repeated his measures with each of the three angles of three different prisms, and he affirmed that Mr. Lucas might make sure to find the image as long or longer than he had yet done, by taking a prism with plain surfaces, and with an angle of 66° or 67°. He admitted that the smallness of the angle in Mr. Lucas's prism, viz. 60°, did not account for the shortness of the spectrum which he obtained with it ; and he observed in one of his own prisms that the length of the image was greater in proportion to the refracting angle than it should have been ; an effect which he ascribes to its having a greater refractive power. There is every reason to believe that the prism of Lucas had actually a less disper- sive power than that of Newton ; and had the Dutch philosopher measured its refractive power instead of guessing it, or had Newton been less confident than he was* that all other prisms must give a * Newton speaks with singular positiveness on this subject. " For / know" says he, "that Mr. Lucas's observations cannot hold where the refracting angle of the prism is full 60°, and the day is clear, and the fall length of the colours is measured, and the breadth of the image answers to the sun's diameter : and seeing I am well assured of th* 58 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. spectrum of the same length as his in relation to its refracting angle and its index of refraction, the in- vention of the achromatic telescope would have been the necessary result. The objections of Lucas drove our author to experiments which he had never before made, — to measure accurately the lengths of the spectra with different prisms of different angles and different refractive powers ; and had the Dutch philosopher maintained his position with more ob- stinacy, he would have conferred a distinguished favour upon science, and would have rewarded Newton for all the vexation which had sprung from the minute discussion of his optical experiments. Such was the termination of his disputes with the Dutch philosophers, and it can scarcely be doubted that it cost him more trouble to detect the origin of his adversaries' blunders, than to establish the great truths which they had attempted to overturn. Harassing as such a controversy must have been to a philosopher like Newton, yet it did not touch those deep-seated feelings which characterize the noble and generous mind. No rival jealousy yet pointed the arguments of his opponents ; — no charges of plagiarism were yet directed against his personal character. These aggravations of scientific contro- versy, however, he was destined to endure ; and in the dispute which he was called to maintain both against Hooke and Huygens, the agreeable con- sciousness of grappling with men of kindred powers was painfully imbittered by the personality and jealousy with which it was conducted. Dr. Robert Hooke was about seven years older than Newton, and was one of the ninety-eight original or unelected members of the Royal Society., truth and exactness of my own observations, I shall be unwilling to fa' diverted by any other experiments from having a fair end made of this in the first place." On the supposition that his prism was one of very; low dispersive power, Mr. Lucas might, with perfect truth, have usedi the very same language towards Newton. CHARACTER OF DR. HOOKE. 59 He possessed great versatility of talent, yet, though his genius was of the most original cast, and his acquirements extensive, he had not devoted himself with fixed purpose to any particular branch of knowledge. His numerous and ingenious inven- tions, of which it is impossible to speak too highly, gave to his studies a practical turn which unfitted him for that continuous labour which physical re- searches so imperiously demand. The subjects of light, however, and of gravitation seem to have deeply occupied his thoughts before Newton ap- peared in the same field, and there can be no doubt that he had made considerable progress in both of these inquiries. With a mind less divergent in its Eursuits, and more endowed with patience of thought, e might have unveiled the mysteries in which both these subjects were enveloped, and preoccupied the intellectual throne which was destined for his rival ; but the infirm state of his health, the peevishness of temper which this occasioned, the number of unfinished inventions from which he looked both for fortune and fame, and, above all, his inordinate love of reputation, distracted and broke down the energies of his powerful intellect. In the more matured inquiries of his rivals he recognised, and often truly, his own incompleted speculations ; and when he saw others reaping the harvest for which he had prepared the ground, and of which he had sown the seeds, it was not easy to suppress the mortification which their success inspired. In the history of science, it has always been a difficult task to adjust the rival claims of competitors, when the one was allowed to have completed what the other was acknowledged to have begun. He who com- mences an inquiry, and publishes his results, often goes much farther than he has announced to the world, and, pushing his speculations into the very heart of the subject, frequently submits them to th& ear of friendship. From the pedestal of his pub- 60 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. lished labours his rival begins his researches, and brings them to a successful issue ; while he has in reality done nothing more than complete and de- monstrate the imperfect speculations of his prede- cessor. To the world, and to himself, he is no doubt in the position of the principal discoverer} but there is still some apology for his rival when he brings forward his unpublished labours ; and some excuse for the exercise of personal feeling, when he. measures the speed of his rival by his own proximity to the goal. The conduct of Dr. Hooke would have been viewed with some such feeling, had not his arro- gance on other occasions checked the natural cur- rent of our sympathy. When Newton presented his reflecting telescope to the Royal Society, Dr. Hooke not only criticised the instrument with undue severity, but announced that he possessed an infal- lible method of perfecting all kinds of optical instru- ments, so that " whatever almost hath been in notion and imagination, or desired in optics, may be performed with great facility and truth." Hooke had been strongly impressed with the belief, that light consisted "in the undulations of a highly elastic medium pervading all bodies; and, guided by his experimental investigation of the phe- nomena of diffraction, he had even announced the (; great principle of interference, which has performed ' such an important part in modern science. Regard- ing himself, therefore, as in possession of the true theory of light, he examined the discoveries of Newton in their relation to his own speculative views, and, finding that their author was disposed to consider that element as consisting of material par- ticles, he did not scruple to reject doctrines which he believed to be incompatible with truth. Dr. , Hooke was too accurate an observer not to admit j the general correctness of Newton's observations. ; He allowed the existence of different refractions, CONTROVERSY WITH HUYGENS. 61 the unchangeableness of the simple colours, and the .production of white light by the union of all the polours of the spectrum ; but he maintained that the pifferent refractions arose from the splitting and rarefying of ethereal pulses, and that there are only two colours in nature, viz. red and violet, which pro- duce by their mixture all the rest, and which are themselves formed by the two sides of a split pulse or undulation. In reply to these observations, Newton wrote an able letter to Oldenburg, dated June 11, 1672, in which he examined with great boldness and force of argument the various objections of his opponent, and maintained the truth of his doctrine of colours, as independent of the two hypotheses respecting the origin and production of light. He acknow- ledged his own partiality to the doctrine of the materiality of light ; he pointed out the defects of the undulatory theory ; he brought forward new ex- periments in confirmati on of his former results ; and he refuted the opini >ns of Hooke respecting the existence of only two simple colours. No reply was made to the powe ul arguments of Newton ; and Hooke contented h nself with laying before the Society his curious ob? ••vations on the colours of soap-bubbles, and of plates of air, and in pursuing his experiments on the diffraction of light, which, after an interval of two years, he laid Tbefore the same body. After he had thus silenced the most powerful of his adversaries, Newton was again called upon to defend himself against a new enemy. Christian Huygens, an eminent mathematician and natural philosopher, who, like Hooke, had maintained the undulatory theory of light, transmitted to Olden- burg various animadversions on the Newtonian doc- trine ; but though his knowledge of optics was of the most extensive kind, yet his objections were nearly as groundless as those of his less enlightened F 62 SIR ISAAC NEWTON, countryman. Attached to his own hypothesis re- specting the nature of light, namely, to the system of undulation, he seems, like Dr. Hooke, to have regarded the discoveries of Newton as calculated to overturn it ; but his principal objections related tc the composition of colours, and particularly of white light, which he alleged could be obtained from the union of two colours, yellow and blue. To this and ^similar objections, Newton replied that the colours in question were not simple yellows and blues, but were compound colours, in which, together, all the colours of the spectrum were themselves blended ; and though he evinced some strong traces of feeling at being again put upon his defence, yet his high respect for Huygens induced him to enter with patience on a fresh development of his doctrine. Huygens felt the reproof which the tone of this answer so gently conveyed, and in writing to Olden- burg, he used the expression, that Mr. Newton " maintained his doctrine with some concern." To this our author replied, " As for Mr. Huygens's ex- pression, I confess it was a little ungrateful to me, to meet with objections which had been answered before, without having the least reason given me why those answers were insufficient." But though Huygens appears in this controversy as a rash objector to the Newtonian doctrine, it was after- ward the fate of Newton to play a similar part against the Dutch philosopher. When Huygens published his beautiful law of double refraction in Iceland spar, founded on the finest experimental analysis of the phenomena, though presented as a result of the undulatory system, Newton not only rejected it, but substituted for it another law entirely inconsistent with the experiments of Huygens, which Newton himself had praised, and with those of all succeeding philosophers. The influence of these controversies on the mind of Newton seems to have been highly exciting REFRACTING TELESCOPES. 63 Even the satisfaction of humbling all his antago- nists he did not feel as a sufficient compensation for the disturbance of his tranquillity. " 1 intend," says he,* " to be no farther solicitous about matters of philosophy. And therefore I hope you will not take it ill if you find me never doing any thing more in that kind ; or rather that you will favour me in my determination, by preventing, so far as you can conveniently, any objections or other philosophical letters that may concern me." In a subsequent let- ter in 1675, he says, " I had some thoughts of writing a further discourse about colours, to be read at one of your assemblies ; but find it yet against the grain to put pen to paper any more on that subject ;" and in a letter to Leibnitz, dated December the 9th, 1675, lie observes, " I was so persectited with discussions arising from the publication of my theory of light, that I blamed my own imprudence for parting with so substantial a blessing as my quiet to run after a shadow." CHAPTER V. Mistake of Newton in supposing that the Improvement nf Refracting Telescopes was hopeless — Mr. Hall invents the Achromatic Telescope — Principles of the Achromatic Telescope explained — // is re-invented by Dollond, and improved by future Artists — Dr. Blair's Aplanatie Telescope — Mistakes in Newton's Analysis of the Spectrum — Modern Discoveries respecting the Structure of the Spectrum. THE new doctrines of the composition of light, and of the difTerent refrangibility of the rays which compose it, having been thus established upon an impregnable basis, it will be interesting to take a general view of the changes which they have under- I etter to Oldenburg in 1672, containing his first reply to Huygens. 64 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. gone since the time of Newton, and of their influ- ence on the progress of optical discovery. There is no fact in the history of science more singular than that Newton should have believed that all bodies produced spectra of equal length, or separated the red and violet rays to equal distances when the refraction of the mean rays was the same. This opinion, unsupported by experiments, and not even sanctioned by any theoretical views, seems to have been impressed upon his mind with all the force of an axiom.* Even the shortness of the spectrum observed by Lucas did not rouse him to further inquiry ; and when, under the influence of this blind conviction he pronounced the improve- ment of the refracting telescope to be desperate, he checked for a long time the progress of this branch of science, and furnished to future philosophers a lesson which cannot be too deeply studied. In 1729, about two years after the death of Sir Isaac, an individual unknown to science broke the spell in which the subject of the spectrum had been so singularly bound. Mr. Chester More Hall, of More Hall in Essex, while studying the mechanism of the human eye, was led to suppose that tele- scopes might be improved by a combination of lenses of different refractive powers, and he actually completed several object-glasses upon this principle. The steps by which he arrived at such a construc- tion have not been recorded ; but it is obvious that he must have discovered what escaped the sagacity of Newton, that prisms made of different kinds of * In an experiment made by Newton, he had occasion to counteract the refraction of a prism of glass by another prism of water ; and had he completed the experiment, and studied the result of it, he could not have failed to observe a quantity of uncorrected colour, which would haTO led him to the discovery of the different dispersive powers of bodies. But in order to increase the refractive power of the water, he mixed with it a little sugar of lead, the high dispersive power of which seems to have rendered the dispersive power of the water equal to that of ihe glass, and thus to have corrected the uncompensated colour of the glass prism. ACHROMATIC TELESCOPE. 66 produced different degrees of separation of the red and violet rays, or gave spectra of different lengths when the refraction of the middle ray of the spectrum was the same. In order to explain how such a property led him to the construction of a telescope without colour, or an achromatic telescope, let us take a lens LL of crown or plate glass, whose focal length LY is about twelve inches. When the sun's rays SL, Fig. 6. SL fall upon it, the red will be refracted to R, the yellow to Y, and the violet to V. If we now place behind it a concave lens II of the same glass, and of the same focus or curvature, it will be found, both by experiment and by drawing the refracted rays, according to the rules given in elementary works, that the concave glass // will refract the rays LR, LR into LS', LS;, and the rays LV, LV into LS', LS' free of all colour; but as these rays will be parallel, the two lenses will not have a focus, and consequently cannot form an image so as to be used as the object-glass of a telescope. This is obvious from another consideration ; for since the curvatures of the convex and concave lenses are the same, the two put together will be exactly the same as if they were formed out of a single piece of glass, having parallel surfaces like a watch-glass, so that the parallel rays of light SL, F2 66 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. SL will pass on in the same direction LS', LS* affected by equal and opposite refractions as in a piece of plane glass. Now, since the convex lens LL separated the white light SL, SL into its component coloured rays, LV, LV being the extreme violet, and LR LR the extreme red ; it follows that a similar con- cave lens of the same glass is capable of uniting into white light LS', LS' rays, as much separated as LV, LR are. Consequently, if we take a con- cave lens II of the same, or of a greater refractive power than the convex one, and having the power of uniting rays farther separated than LV, LR are, a less concavity in the lens II will be sufficient to unite the rays LV, LR into a white ray LS' ; but as the lens // is now less concave than the lens LL is convex, the concavity will predominate, and the uncoloured rays LS', LS' will no longer be parallel, but will converge to some point 0, where they will form a colourless or achromatic image of the sun. The effect now described may be obtained by making the convex lens LL of crown or of plate glass, and the concave one of flint glass, or that of which wineglasses are made. If the concave lens // has a greater refractive power than LL, which is always the case, the only effect of it will be to make the rays converge to a focus more remote than O, or to render a less curvature necessary in //, if O is fixed for the focus of the combined lenses. Such is the principle of the achromatic telescope as constructed by Mr. Hall. This ingenious indi- vidual employed working opticians to grind his lenses, and he furnished them with the radii of the surfaces, which were adjusted to correct the aber- ration of figure as well as of colour. His invention, therefore, was not an accidental combination of a convex and a concave lens of different kinds of glass, which might have oeen made merely for ex- periment; but it was a complete achromatic tele- ACHROMATIC TELESCOPES. 67 scope, founded on a thorough knowledge of the lifferent dispersive powers of crown and flint glass. [t is a curious circumstance, however, in the his- ;ory of the telescope, that this invention was ac- tually lost. Mr. Hall never published any account (}f his labours, and it is probable that he kept them secret till he should be able to present his instru- nent to the public in a more perfect form ; and it ,vas not till John Dollond had discovered the pro- perty of light upon which the instrument depends, md had actually constructed many fine telescopes, ;hat the previous labours of Mr. Hall were laid be- bre the public.* From this period the achromatic elescope underwent gradual improvement, and by he successive labours of Dollond, Ramsden, Blair, Pulley, Guinand, Lerebours, and Fraunhofer, it has >ecome one of the most valuable instruments in. )hysical science. Although the achromatic telescope, as constructed >y Dollond, was founded on the principle that the spectra formed by crown and flint glass differed mly in their relative lengths, when the refraction )f the mean ray was the same, yet by a more mi- lute examination of the best instruments, it was bund that they exhibited white or luminous objects inged on one side with a green fringe, and on the Hher with one of a claret colour. These colours, tvhich did not arise from any defect of skill in the .rtist, were found to arise from a difference in the extent of the coloured spaces in two equal spectra 'ormed by crown and by flint glass. This property was called the irrationality of the coloured spaces, and the uncorrected colours which remained when ;he primary spectrum of the crown glass was cor* rected by the primary spectrum of the flint glass were called the secondary or residual spectrum. By * See the article OPTICS in the Edinburgh Encyclopedia, vol xv » 479, note. 68 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. a happy contrivance, which it would be out of placi here to describe, Dr. Blair succeeded in correcting this secondary spectrum, or in removing the greer and claret-coloured fringes which appeared in th< best telescopes, and to this contrivance he gave the name of the Aplanatic Telescope. But while Newton thus overlooked these remark able properties of the prismatic spectrum, as formec by different bodies, he committed some considera- ble mistakes in his examination of the spectrurr which was under his own immediate examination It does not seem to have occurred to him that the relations of the coloured spaces must be greatly modified by the angular magnitude of the sun or the luminous body, or aperture from which the spec- trum is obtained ; and misled by an apparent ana- logy between the length of the coloured spaces anc ,the divisions of a musical chord,* he adopted the 'j: latter, as representing the proportion of the col- oured spaces in every beam of white light. Hac two other observers, one situated in Mercury, anc the other in Jupiter, studied the prismatic spectrurr. of the sun by the same instruments, and with the same sagacity as Newton, it is demonstrable thai they would have obtained very different results. Or account of the apparent magnitude of the sun in Mer- cury, the observer there would obtain a spectrum entirely without green, having red, orange, and yel- >low at one end, the white in the middle, and termi- nated at the other end with blue and violet. The 'observer in Jupiter would, on the contrary, have obtained a spectrum in which the colours were much more condensed. On the planet Saturn a spectrum exactly similar would have been obtained, *"This result was obtained," as Newton says, "by an assistanl whose eyes were more critii al than mine, and who, by right lines drawn across the spectrum, noted the confines of the colours. And this opera- tion being divers times repeated both on the same and on several papers, I found that the observations agreed well enough with one another."— OPTICS, Part II. Book III. PRISMATIC SPECTRUM. 69 withstanding the greater diminution of the sun's [apparent diameter* It may now be asked, which of all these spectra are we to consider as exhibiting the number, and arrangement, and extent of the coloured spaces proper to be adopted as the true [analysis of a solar ray. The spectrum observed by Newton has surely no claim to our notice, merely because it was observed upon the surface of the earth. The spectrum ob- tained in Mercury affords no analysis at all of the incident beam, the colours being almost all com- pound, and not homogeneous, and that of Newton is liable to the same objection. Had Newton ex- amined his spectrum under the very same circum- stances in winter and in summer, he would have found the analysis of the beam more complete in summer, on account of the diminution of the sun's diameter ; and, therefore, we are entitled to say that i neither the number nor the extent of the coloured/ spaces, as given by Newton, are those which belong! fohomogeneous and uncompoundedjight. [ 'I'tie spectrum obtained in Jupiter and Saturn is the only one where the analysis is complete, as it is incapable of having its character altered by any far- ther diminution of the sun's diameter. Hence we are forced to conclude, not only that the number and extent of the primitive homogeneous colours, as given by Newton, are incorrect ; but that if he had attempted to analyze some of the primitive tints in the spectrum, he would have found them decidedly composed of heterogeneous rays. There is one consequence of these observations which is some- what interesting. A rainbow formed in summer, when the sun's diameter is least, must have its col- ours more condensed and homogeneous than in win- ter, when the size of its disk is a maximum, and when the upper or the under limb of the sun is eclipsed, a rainbow formed at that time will lose entirely the yellow rays, and have the green and the 70 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. red in perfect contact. For the same reason, a rain- ] bow formed in Venus and Mercury will be destitute of green rays, and have a brilliant bow of white light separating two coloured arches ; while in Mars Jupiter, Saturn, and the Georgian planet, the bo\\ will exhibit only four homogeneous colours. From his analysis of the solar spectrum, Newtor concluded, " that to the same degree of refrangibilit} ever belonged the same colour, and to the same colour ever belonged the same degree of refrangi- bility ;" and hence he inferred, that red, orange, yel- low, green, blue, indigo, and violet were primary and. simple colours. He admitted, indeed, that "the same colours in specie with these primary ones ma); be also produced by composition. For a mixture of yellow and blue makes green, and of red and yellou makes orange;" but such compound colours were easily distinguished from the simple colours of the spectrum by the circumstance, that they are always capable of being resolved by the action of the prism into the two colours which compose them. This view of the composition of the spectrum might have long remained unchallenged, had we not been able to apply to it a new mode of analysis. Though we cannot separate the green rays of the spectrum into yellow and blue by the refraction of grisms, yet if we possessed any substance which ad a specific attraction for blue rays, and which stopped them in their course, and allowed the yel- low rays to pass, we should thus analyze the green as effectually as if they were separated by refraction. The substance which possesses this property is a purplish blue glass, similar to that of which finger- glasses are made. When we view through a piece of this glass, about the twentieth of an inch thick, a brilliant prismatic spectrum, we find that it has exercised a most extraordinary absorptive action on the different colours which compose it. The red part of the spectrum is divided into two red spaces^ SPECTRUM OF THREE COLOURS. 71 separated by an interval entirely devoid of light. e Next to the inner red space comes a space of bright oi/ellow, separated from the red by a visible interval. ;, A.fter the yellow comes the gr&m, with an obscure rjspace between them, then follows the blue and the biolet, the last of which has suffered little or no Diminution. Now it is very obvious, that in this Jbxperiment, the blue glass has actually absorbed phe red rays, which, when mixed with the yellow an one side, constituted orange, and the blue rays, which, when mixed with the yellow on the other side, constituted green, so that the insulation of ;he yellow rays thus effected, and the disappearance )f the orange, and of the greater part of the green light, proves beyond a doubt that the orange and rreen colours in the spectrum are compound col- >urs, the former consisting of red and yellow rays, md the latter of yellow and blue rays of the very ame refrangibility. If we compare the two red spaces of the spectrum seen through the blue glass kvith the red space seen without the blue glass, it vill be obvious that the red has experienced such in alteration in its tint by the action of the blue flass, as would be effected by the absorption of a imall portion of yellow rays ; and hence we con- dude, that the red of the spectrum contains a slight inge of yellow, and that the yellow space extends >ver more than one-half of the spectrum, including he red, orange, yellow, green, and blue spaces. I have found also that red light exists in the yel- ow space, and it is certain that in the violet space ed light exists in a state of combination with the )lue rays. From these and other facts which it ivould be out of place here to explain, I conclude hat the prismatic spectrum consists of three differ- nt spectra, viz. red, yellow, and blue, all having he same length, and all overlapping each other. Hence red, yellow, and blue rays of the very same efrangibility coexist at every point of the spec* 72 em ISAAC NEWTON. trum ; but the colour at any one point will be thai of the predominant ray, and will depend upon the relative distance of the point from the maximum ordinate of the curve which represents the intensity of the light of each of the three spectra. This structure of the spectrum, which harmo- nizes with the old hypothesis of three simple colours, will be understood from the annexed diagram where MN is the spectrum of seven colours, al compounded of the three simple ones, red, yellow Fig. 7. and blue. The ordinates of the curves R, Y, anc B will express the intensities of each colour at dif- ferent points of the spectrum. At the red extrem- ity M of the spectrum, the pure red is scarcel} altered by the very slight intermixture of yellow and blue. Farther on in the red space, the yellou begins to make the red incline to scarlet. It ther exists in sufficient quantity to form orange, and, as the red declines, the yellow predominates over the feeble portion of red and blue which are mixed wit! it. As the yellow decreases in intensity, the in- creasing blue forms with it a good green, and the blue rising to its maximum speedily overpowers the small portion of yellow and red. When the blue becomes very faint, the red exhibits its influence in converting it into violet, and the yellow ceasei LIXES IN THE SPECTRtTM. 73 to exercise a marked influence on the tint. The influence of the red over the blue space is scarcely perceptible, on account of the great intensity of the blue light ; but we may easily conceive it to reap- pear and form the violet light, not only from the rapid decline of the blue light, but from the greater influence of the red rays upon the retina. These views may, perhaps, be more clearly under- stood by supposing that a certain portion of white light is actually formed at every point of the spec- trum by the union of the . requisite number of the three coloured rays that exist at any point. The white light thus formed will add to the brilliancy without affecting the tint of the predominant colour. In the violet space we may conceive the small portion of yellow which exists there to form white light with a part of the blue and a part of the red, so that the resulting tint will be violet, composed of the blue and the small remaining portion of red, mixed with the white light. This white light will possess the remarkable property of not being sus- ceptible of decomposition by the analysis of the prism, as it is composed of red, yellow, and blue rays of the very same refrangibility. The insula- tion of this white light by the absorption of the predominant colours I have effected in the green, yellow, and red spaces, and by the use of new ab- sorbing media we may yet hope to exhibit it in some of the other colours, particularly in the brightest part of the blue space, where an obvious approxi- mation to it takes place. : Among the most important modern discoveries respecting the spectrum we must enumerate that of fixed dark and coloured lines, which we owe to the sagacity of Dr. Wollaston and M. Fraunhofer. Two or three of these lines were discovered by Dr. Wollaston, but nearly 600 have been detected by means of the fine prisms and the magnificent appa- ratus of the Bavarian optician. These lines are G SIR ISAAC NEWTOW. parallel to one another, and perpendicular to the length of the spectrum. The largest occupy a space from 5" to 10" in breadth. Sometimes they occur in well-defined lines, and at other times in groups ; and in all spectra formed from solar light, they preserve the same order and intensity, and the same relative position to the coloured spaces, what- ever be the nature of the prism by which they are froduced. Hence these lines are fixed points, by which the relative dispersive powers of different media may be ascertained with a degree of accu- racy hitherto unknown in this branch of science. In the light of the fixed stars, and in that of artificial flames, a different system of lines is produced, and this system remains unaltered, whatever be the na- ture of the prism by which the spectrum is formed. The most important fixed lines in the spectrum formed by light emitted from the sun, whether it is reflected from the sky, the clouds, or the moon, may be easily seen by looking at a narrow slit in the window-shutter of a dark room, through a hollow prism formed of plates of parallel glass, and filled with any fluid of a considerable dispersive power. The slit should not greatly exceed the twentieth of an inch, and the eye should look through the thinnest edge of the prism where there is the least thickness of fluid. These lines I have found to be the boun- daries of spaces within which the rays have par- ticular affinities for particular bodies. COLOURS OF THIN PLATES. 75 CHAPTER VL Colours of thin Plates first studied by Boy ^and Hooke — Newton de- termines the Law of their Production— His Theory of Fits of Easy Refection and Transmission — Colours of thick Plates. IN examining the nature and origin of colours as the component parts of white light, the attention of Newton was directed to the curious subject of the colours of thin plates, and to its application to ex- plain the colours of natural bodies. His earliest researches on this subject were communicated, in his Discourse on Light and Colours, to the Royal Society, on the 9th December, 1675, and were read at subsequent meetings of that body. This discourse contained fuller details respecting the composition and decomposition of light than he had given in his letter to Oldenburg, and was concluded with nine propositions, showing how the colours of thin trans- parent plates stand related to those of all natural bodies. The colours of thin plates seem to have been first observed by Mr. Boyle. Dr. Hooke afterward studied them with some care, and gave a correct account of the leading phenomena, as exhibited in the coloured rings upon soap-bubbles, and between plates of glass pressed together. He recognised that the colour depended upon some certain thick- ness of the transparent plate, but he acknowledges that he had attempted in vain to discover the rela- tion between the thickness of the plate and the colour which it produced. Dr. Hooke succeeded in splitting a mineral sub- stance, called mica, into films of such extreme thin- ness as to give brilliant colours. One p'ate, for ex- 76 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. ample, gave a yellow colour, another a blue colour, and the two together a deep purple ; but, as plates which produced those colours were always less than the 12,000th part of an inch thick, it was quite im- practicable, by any contrivance yet discovered, to measure their thickness, and determine the law ac- cording to which the colour varied with the thick- ness of the film. Newton surmounted this difficulty by laying a double convex lens, the radius of curva- ture of each side of which was fifty feet, upon the flat surface of a plano-convex object-glass, and in this way he obtained a plate of air or of space vary- ing from the thinnest possible edge at the centre of the object-glass where it touched the plane surface, to a considerable thickness at the circumference of the lens. When light was allowed to fall upon the object-glass, every different thickness of the plate of air between the object-glass gave different colours, so that the point where the two object-glasses touched one another was the centre of a number of concentric coloured rings. Now, as the curvature of the object-glass was known, it was easy to cal- culate the thickness of the plate of air at which any particular colour appeared, and thus to determine the law of the phenomena. In order to understand how he proceeded, let CED be the convex surface of the one object-glass, and AEB the flat surface of the other. Let them touch at the point E, and let homogeneous red rays fall upon them, as shown in the figure. At the point of contact E, where the plate of air is inconceiva- bly thin, not a single ray of the pencil RE is re- flected. The light is wrholly transmitted, and, con- sequently, to an eye above E, there will appear at E a black spot. At <z, where the plate of air is thicker, the red light ra is reflected in the direction ca', and as the air has the same thickness in a circle round tho point E, the eye above E, at a, will see next the black spot E a ring of red light. At m, COLOURS OF THIN PLATES. Fig. 8. 77 where the thickness of the air is a little greater than at «, the light r'm is all transmitted as at E, and not a single ray suffers reflection, so that to an eye above E at mf there will be seen without the red ring a a dark ring m. In like manner, at greater thick- nesses of the plate of air, there is a succession of red and dark rings, diminishing in breadth as shown in the diagram. When the same experiment was repeated in orarige, yellow, green, Uue, indigo, and violet light, the very same phenomenon was observed; with this differ- ence only, that the rings were largest in red light, and smallest in violet light, and had intermediate magnitudes in the intermediate colours. If the observer now places his eye below E, so as to see the transmitted rays, he will observe a set of rings as before, but they will have a bright spot in their centre at E, and the luminous rings will now correspond with those which were dark when seen by reflection, as will be readily understood from in- specting the preceding diagram. When the object-glasses are illuminated by white G2 78 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. light, the seven systems of rings, formed by all the seven colours which compose white light, will now be seen at once. Had the rings in each colour been all of the same diameter they would all have formed brilliant white rings, separated by dark intervals; but, as they have all different diameters, they will overlap one another, producing rings of various colours by their mixture. These colours, reckoning from the centre E, are as follows : — 1st Order. Black, blue, white, yellow, orange, red. 2d Order. Violet, blue, green, yellow, orange, red. 3d Order. Purple, blue, green, yellow, red, bluish- red. 4th Order. Bluish-green, green, yellowish-green, red. 5th Order. Greenish-blue, red. 6th Order. Greenish-blue, red. By accurate measurements, Sir Isaac found that the thicknesses of air at which the most luminous parts of the first rings were produced, were in parts of an inch TTf 3-^, -py^Tnnj? TT5Tr<nr» TTffrnnr* c TTf 3-^, -py^Tnnj? TT5Tr<nr» TTffrnnr* TT^ffw* If tne niedium or the substance of the thin plate is water, as in the case of the soap-bubble, which produces beautiful colours according to its different degrees of thinness, the thicknesses at which the most luminous parts of the rings appear are produced at j.^ of the thickness at which they are produced in air, and in the case of glass or mica atr.?V? °f tnat thickness; the numbers 1.336, 1.525 expressing the ratio of the sines of the angles of incidence and refraction in the substances which produce the colours. From the phenomena thus briefly described, Sir Isaac Newton deduces that ingenious, though hy- pothetical, property of light, called its fits of easy reflection and transmission. This property consists in supposing that every particle of light from its first discharge from a luminous body possesses, at equally distant intervals, dispositions to be reflected from, FITS OF REFLECTION, ETC 79 and transmitted through, the surfaces of bodies upon which it is incident. Hence, if a particle of light reaches a reflecting surface of glass when it is in its^ of reflection, or in its disposition to be reflected, it will yield more readily to the reflecting force of the surface ; and, on the contrary, if it reaches the same surface while in a Jit of easy transmission, or in a disposition to be transmitted, it will yield with more difficulty to the reflecting force. Sir Isaac has not ventured to inquire into the cause of this property ; but we may form a very intelligible idea of it by supposing, that the particles of light have two attractive and two repulsive poles at the ex- tremities of two axes at right angles to each other, and that the particles revolve round their axes, and at equidistant intervals bring one or other of these axes into the line of the direction in which the par- ticle is moving. If the attractive axis is in the line of the direction in which the particle moves when it reaches the refracting surface, the particle will yield to the attractive force of the medium, and be re- fracted and transmitted ; but if the repulsive axis is in the direction of the particle's motion when it reaches the surface, it will yield to the repulsive force of the medium, and be reflected from it. The application of the theory of alternate fits of reflection and transmission to explain the colours of thin plates is very simple. When the light falls upon the first surface AB, Fig. 8 of the plate of air be- tween AB and CED, the rays that are in a fit of re- flection are reflected, and those that are in a fit of transmission are transmitted. Let us call F the length of a fit, or the distance through which the particle of light moves while it passes from the state of being in a fit of reflection to the state of being in a fit of transmission. Now, as all the particles of light transmitted through AB were in a state of easy transmission when they entered AB, it is obvious, that, if the plate of air at E is so thin as to be less 80 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. than one-half of F, the particles of light will still be in their disposition to be transmitted, and conse- quently the light will be all transmitted, and none reflected at the curve surface at E. When the plate becomes thicker towards 0, so that its thickness ex- ceeds half of F, the light will not reach the surface CE till it has come under its fit of reflection, and consequently at a the light will be all reflected, and none transmitted. As the thickness increases to- wards m, the light will have come under its fit of transmission, and so on, the light being reflected at a, Z, and transmitted at E, m. This will perhaps be still more easily understood from fig. 9, where we Fig. 9. may suppose AEG to be a thin wedge of glass or any other transparent body. When light is incident on the first surface AE, all the particles of it that are in a fit of easy reflection will be reflected, and all those in a fit of easy transmission will be trans- mitted. As the fits of transmission all commence at AE, let the first fit of transmission end when the particles of light have reached ab, and the second when they have reached ef; and let the fits of re- flection commence at cd and gh. Then, as the fit of transmission continues from AE to ab, all the light that falls upon the portion mE of the second surface will be transmitted and none reflected, so that to an eye above E the space mE will appear black. As the fit of reflection commences at ab, and COLOURS OF THICK PLATES. 81 continues to cd, all the light which falls upon the portion nm will be reflected, and none transmitted ; and so on, the light being transmitted at mE and pn, and reflected at nm and qp. Hence to an eye above E the wedge-shaped film of which AEG is a section will be covered with parallel bands or fringes of light separated by dark fringes of the same breadth, and they will be all parallel to the thin edge of the plate, a dark fringe corresponding 10 the thinnest edge. To an eye placed below CE similar fringes will be seen, but the one correspond- ing to the thinnest edge mE will be luminous. If the thickness of the plate does not vary accord- ing to a regular law as in Jig. 9, but if, like a film of blown glass, it has numerous inequalities, then the alternate fringes of light and darkness will vary with the thickness of the film, and throughout the whole length of each fringe the thickness of the film will be the same. We have supposed in the preceding illustration that the light employed is homogeneous. If it is white, then the differently coloured fringes will form by their superposition a system of fringes analogous to those seen between two object-glasses, as already explained. The same periodical colours which we have now described as exhibited by thin plates were discov- ered by Newton in thick plates, and he has ex- plained them by means of the theory of fits ; but it would lead us beyond the limits of a popular work like this to enter into any details of his observations, or to give an account of the numerous and important additions which this branch of optics has received from the discoveries of £ deseeding authors. SIR ISAAC NEWTON. CHAPTER VII. Newton's Theory of the Colours of Natural Bodies explained— Objec- tions to it stated — New Classification of Colours — Outline of a New Theory proposed, IP the objects of the material world" had been illuminated with white light, all the particles of which possessed the same degree of refrangibility, and were equally acted upon by the bodies on which they fall, all nature would have shone with a leaden hue, and all the combinations of external objects, and all the features of the human countenance, would have exhibited no other variety but that which they possess in a pencil sketch or a China-ink drawing. The rainbow itself would have dwindled into a nar- row arch of white light, — the stars would have shone through a gray sky, — and the mantle of a wintry twilight would have replaced the golden vesture of the rising and the setting sun. But He who has ex- hibited such matchless skill in the organization of material bodies, and such exquisite taste in the forms upon which they are modelled, has superadded that ethereal beauty which enhances their more per- manent qualities, and presents them to us in the ever-varying colours of the spectrum. Without this the foliage of vegetable life might have rilled the eye and fostered the fruit which it veils, — but the youth- ful green of its spring would have been blended with the dying yellow of its autumn. Without this the diamond might have displayed to science the beauty of its forms, and yielded to the arts its adamantine virtues ; — but it would have ceased to shine in the chaplet of beauty, and to sparkle in the diadem of princes. Without this the human countenance might COLOURS OF NATURAL BODIES. 83 have expressed all the sympathies of the heart, but the " purple light of love" would not have risen on the cheek, nor the hectic flush been the herald of its decay. The gay colouring- with which the Almighty has decked the pale marble of nature is not the result of any quality inherent in the coloured body, or in the particles by which it may be tinged, but is merely a property of the light in which they happen to be Dlaced. Newton was the first person who placed his great truth in the clearest evidence. He found hat all bodies, whatever were their peculiar colours, exhibited these colours only in white light. When hey were illuminated by homogeneous red light hey appeared red, by homogeneous yellow light, jellow, and so on, " their colours being most brisk and vivid under the influence of their own daylight colours." The leaf of a plant, for example, ap- )eared green in the white light of day, because it lad the property of reflecting that light in greater abundance than any other. When it was placed in lomogeneous red light, it could no longer appear green, because there was no green light to reflect ; nit it reflected a portion of red light, because there was some red in the compound green which it had ;he property of reflecting. Had the leaf originally reflected a pure homogeneous green, unmixed with red, and reflected no white light from its outer sur- face, it would have appeared quite black in pure ho- mogeneous red light, as this light does not contain a single ray which the leaf was capable of reflect- ing. Hence the colours of material bodies are owing to the property which they possess of stopping cer- tain rays of white light, while they reflect or trans- mit to the eye the rest of the rays of which white light is composed. So far the Newtonian doctrine of colours is ca- pable of rigid demonstration; but its author was not content with carrying it thus far : he sought to 84 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. determine the manner in which particular rays are stopped, while others are reflected or transmitted ; and the result of this profound inquiry was his theory of the colours of natural bodies, which was commu- nicated to the Royal Society on the 10th February, 1675. This theory is perhaps the loftiest of all his speculations ; and though, as a physical generaliza- tion, it stands on a perishable basis, and must soon be swept away in the progress of science, it yet bears the deepest impress of the grasp of his pow- erful intellect. The principles upon which this theory is founded are the following : — 1. Bodies that have the greatest refractive powers reflect the greatest quantity of light; and at the confines of equally refracting media there is no re- flection. 1 2. The least particles of almost all natural bodies are in some measure transparent. 3. Between the particles of bodies are many pores or spaces, either empty or filled with media of less density than the particles. 4. The particles of bodies and their pores, or the spaces between the particles, have some definite size. Upon these principles Newton explains the origin of transparency, opacity, and colour. Transparency^ considers as arising from the par- ticles and their intervals or pores being too small to cause reflection at their common surfaces,* so that all the light which enters transparent bodies passes through them without any portion of it being turned from its path by reflection. If we could obtain, for example, a film of mica whose thickness does not exceed two-thirds of the millionth part of an inch, all the light which fell upon it would pass through it and none would be reflected. If this film was thei] * Optics, Book ii. Prop. iv. COLOURS OF NATURAL BODIES. 85 cut into fragments, a number of such fragments would constitute a bundle, which would also trans- mit all the light which fell upon it, and be perfectly transparent. Opacity in bodies arises, he thinks, from an oppo- site cause, viz. when the parts of bodies are of such a size as to be capable of reflecting the light which falls upon them, in which case the light is "stopped or stifled" by the multitude of reflections. The colours of natural bodies have, in the New- tonian hypothesis, the same origin as the colours of thin plates, their transparent particles, according to their several sizes, reflecting rays of one colour, and transmitting those of another. "For if a thinned or plated body which, being of an uneven thickness, appears all over of one uniform colour, should be slit into threads, or broken into fragments of the same thickness with the plate or film, every thread or frag- ment should keep its colour, and consequently, a heap of such threads or fragments should constitute a mass or powder of the same colour which the plate exhibited before it was broken: and the parts of all natural bodies being like so many fragments of a plate, must, on the same grounds, exhibit the same colour." Such is the theory of the colours of natural bodies, stated as clearly and briefly as we can. It has been very generally admitted by philosophers, both of our own and of other countries, and has been recently illustrated and defended by a French philoso- pher of distinguished eminence. That this theory affords the true explanation of certain colours, or, to speak more correctly, that certain coloms in natu- ral bodies are the colours of thin plates, cannot be doubted; but it will not be difficult to show that it is quite inapplicable to that great class of phenomena which may be considered as representing the colours of natural bodies. The first objection to the Newtonian theory is the H 86 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. total absence of all reflected light from the particles of transparent coloured media, such as coloured gems, coloured glasses, and coloured fluids. This objection was urged long ago by Mr. Delaval, who placed coloured fluids on black grounds, and never could perceive the least trace of the reflected tints. I have repeated the experiment with every precau- tion, and with every variation that I could think of, and I consider it as an established fact, that in such coloured bodies the complementary reflected colour cannot be rendered visible. If the fluid, for example, be red, the green light from which the red has been separated ought to appear either directly by looking into the coloured mass, or ought to be recognised by its influence in modifying the light really re- flected; but as it cannot be seen, we must conclude that it has not been reflected, but has been de- stroyed by some other property of the coloured body. A similar objection may be drawn from the disap- pearance of the transmitted complementary colour in the leaves of plants and petals of flowers. I have ascertained from numerous experiments, that the transmitted colour is almost invariably the same with the reflected colour, and that the same holds true with the coloured juices expressed from them. The complementary tints are never seen, and wher- ever there has been any thing like an approximation to two tints, I have invariably found that it arose from there being two different coloured juices exist- ing hi different sides of the leaf. In the phenomena of the light transmitted by coloured glasses, there are some peculiarities which, we think, demonstrate that their colours are not those of thin plates. The light, for example, trans- mitted through a particular kind of blue glass, has a blue colour of such a peculiar composition that there is no bine in any of the orders of colours in thii plates which has any resemblance to it. It is entirely COLOURS OF NATURAL BODIES. 87 destitute of the red rays which form the middle of the red space in the spectrum; so that the particles on which the colour depends must reflect the middle red rays, and transmit those on each side of it, — a property which cannot be deduced from the New- tonian doctrine. The explanation of opacity, as arising from a multitude of reflections, is liable to the same ob- jection which we have urged against the explana- tion of colour. In order to appreciate its weight, we must distinguish opacity into two kinds, namely, the opacity of whiteness and the opacity of blackness. Those bodies which possess the power of reflection in the highest degree, such as white metals, chalk, and plaster of Paris, never reflect more than one- half of the light which falls upon them. The other half of the incident light is, according to Newton, lost by a multitude of reflections. But how is it lost ? Reflection merely changes the direction of the particles of light, so that they must again emerge from the body, unless they are reflected into fixed returning orbits, which detain them for ever in a state .of motion within the body. In the case of black opacity, such as that of coal, which reflects from its first surface only J7th of the white light, the difficulty is still greater, and we cannot conceive how any system of interior reflections could so completely stifle f^ths of the whole incident light, without some of it returning to the eye in a visible form. In determining the constitution of bodies that pro- duce transparency and blackness, the Newtonian theory encounters a difficulty which its author has by no means surmounted. Transparency, as we have already seen, arises from the "particles and their interstices being too small to cause reflections in their common surfaces," that is, they must be "less than any of those which exhibit colours," or "less than is requisite to reflect the white and very 88 «IR ISAAC NEWTON. faint blue of the first order. But this is the very same constitution which produces blackness by reflection, and in order to explain the cause of blackness by transmission, or black opacity, Newton is obliged to introduce a new principle. ".For the production of black" says he, "the cor- puscles must be less than any of those which ex- hibit colours. For at all greater sizes there is too much light reflected to constitute this colour. But if -they be supposed a little less than is requisite to reflect the white and very faint blue of the first or- der, they will reflect so very little light as to appear intensely black, and yet may perhaps variously refract* it to and fro within themselves so long, until it hap- pens to be stifled and lost, by which means they will appear black in all positions of the eye, without any transparency." This very remarkable passage exhibits, in a striking manner, the perplexity in which our author was in- volved by the difficulties of his subject. As the par- ticles which produce blackness by reflection are necessarily so small as to exclude the existence of any reflective forces, he cannot ascribe the loss of the intromitted light, as he does in the case of white opacity, to " a multitude of reflections ;" and there- fore he is compelled to have recourse to refracting forces to perform the same office. The reluctance with which he avails himself of this expedient is well marked in the mode of expression which he adopts ; and I am persuaded that when he wrote the above passage, he felt the full force of the objec- tions to this hypothesis, which cannot fail to pre- sent themselves. As the size of the particles which produce blackness are intermediate between those * In the same paragraph, when speaking of black bodies becoming hot, and burning sooner than others, he says that their "effect may pro- ceed partly from the multitude of refractions in a little room, and partly from the easy commotion of so very small corpuscles."— Optics, Part iii. Prop. vii. p. 335. COLOURS OF NATURAL BODIES. 89 which produce transparency and those which pro- duce colour, approaching closely to the latter, it is difficult to conceive why they should refract the in- tromitted light, while the greater and smaller par- ticles, and even those almost of the same size, should be destitute of that property ^ It is, besides, not easy to understand how a refraction can take place within bodies which shall stifle all the light, and prevent it from emerging. Nay, we may admit the existence of such refractions, and yet understand how, by a compensation in their direction, the refracted rays may all emerge from the opaque body. The force of these objections is tacitly recognised in Pemberton's View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philoso- phy ;* and as Newton not only read and approved of that work, but even perused a great part of it along with its author, we may fairly consider the opinion there stated to be his own. " For producing black, the particles ought to be smaller than for exhibiting any of the colours, viz. of a size answering to the thickness of the bubble, whereby reflecting little or no light, it appears colour- less; but yet they must not be too small, for that will make them transparent through deficiency of reflec- tions in the inward parts of the body, sufficient to stop the light from going through it ; but they must be of a size bordering upon that disposed to reflect the faint blue of the first order, which affords an evident reason why blacks usually partake a little of fhat colour." In this passage all idea of refrac- tion is abandoned, and that precise degree of size is assumed for the particles which leaves a small power of reflection, which is deemed sufficient to prevent the body from becoming transparent; that is, suffi- cient to render it opaque or black. The last objection which we shall state to this theory is one to which we attach great weight, and, * See page 354. H2 t)0 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. as it is founded on discoveries and views which have been published since the time of Newton, we ven- ture to believe, that, had he been aware of them, he would never have proposed the theory which we are considering. When light falls upon a thin film such as AEC, fig. 9, p. 80, so as to produce the colours of thin plates, it follows, from Sir Isaac Newton's theory of fits, that a portion of the light is, as usual, re- flected at the first surface AE,* while the light which forms the coloured image is that which is reflected from the second surface EC, so that all the colours of thin plates are diluted with the white light re- flected from the first surface. Now, in the modern theory, which ascribes the colours of thin plates to the interference of the light reflected from the second surface EC, with the light reflected from the first surface AE, the resulting tint arises from the combination of these two pencils, and consequently there is no wliite light reflected from the surface AE. In like manner, when the thickness of the film is such that the two interfering pencils com- pletely destroy one another, and produce black, there is not a ray of light reflected from the first surface. Here, then, we have a criterion for de- ciding between the theory of fits and the theory of interference ; for if there is no white light reflected from the first surface AE, the theory of fits must be rejected. In a remarkable phenomenon of black- ness arising from minute fibres, which I have had occasion to describe, there was no perceptible re- flection from the surface of the fibres ;f and M. Fresnel describes an experiment made to deter- mine the same point, and states the result of it to * When Newton speaks of bodies losing their reflecting power from their thinness, he means the reflecting power of their second surfaces, as is evident from the reason he assigns.— See Optics, Part iii. Prop, xiii, p. 257. \ Edinburgh Journal of Science, No I p. 108. COLOURS OF NATURAL BODIES. 91 have been unequivocally in favour of the doctrine of interference. In order to apply this important fact, let us take a piece of coal, one of the blackest and most opaque of all substances, and which does not reflect to the eye a single ray out of those which enter its sub- stance. The size of its particles is so small, that they are incapable of reflecting light. When a num- ber of these particles are placed together, so as to form a surface, and other particles behind them, so as to form a solid, they will not acquire by this process the power of reflection ; and consequently, a piece of coal so composed should be destitute of the property of reflecting light from its first surface. But this is not the case, — light is abundantly re- flected from the first surface of the coal, and conse- quently, its elementary particles must possess the same power. Hence the blackness of coal must be ascribed to some other cause than to the minute- ness of its transparent atoms. To transparent bodies this argument has a similar application. As their atoms are still less than those of black bodies, their inability to reflect light is still greater, and hence arises their transparency. But the particles forming the surface of such bodies do reflect light, and, therefore, their transparency must have another origin. In the case of coloured bodies, too, the particles forming their surfaces reflect white light like those of all other bodies, so that these particles cannot produce colour on the same principles as those of thin plates. In many of those cases of colour which seem to depend upon the minuteness of the particles of the body, the reflection of white light may never- theless be observed, but this will be found to arise from a thin transparent film, behind which the colo- rific particles are placed. Whatever answer may be given to these objec- tions, we think it will be admitted by those who 92 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. have studied the subject most profoundly, that a satisfactory theory of the colours of natural bodies is still a desideratum in science. How far we may be able to approach to it in the present state of optics the reader will judge from the following views. Colours may be arranged into seven classes, each of which depends upon different principles. 1. Transparent coloured fluids — transparent col cured gems — transparent coloured glasses — coloured powders — and the colours of the leaves and flowers of plants. 2. Oxidations on metals — colours of Labrador feldspar — colours of precious and hydrophanous opal, and other opalescences — the colours of the feathers of birds, of the wings of insects, and of the scales of fishes. 3. Superficial colours, as those of mother-of-pearl and striated surfaces. 4. Opalescences and colours in composite crystals having double refraction. 5. Colours from the absorption of common and polarized light by doubly refracting crystals. 6. Colours at the surfaces of media of different dispersive powers. 7. Colours at the surface of media in which the reflecting forces extend to different distances, or fol- low different laws. The first two of these classes are the most im- portant. The Newtonian theory appears to be strictly applicable to the phenomena of the second class ; but those of the first class cannot, we con- ceive, be referred to the same cause. The rays of solar light possess several remarkable physical properties : They heat — they illuminate — they promote chymical combination — they effect chymical decompositions — they impart magnetism to steel — thej alter the colours of bodies — thev NEW THEORY OF COLOURS. 93 communicate to plants and flowers their peculiar colours, and are in many cases necessary to the development of their characteristic qualities. It is impossible to admit for a moment that these varied effects are produced by a mere mechanical action, or that they arise from the agitation of the particles of bodies by the vibration of the ether which is con- sidered to be the cause of light. Whatever be the difficulties which attach to the theory which sup- poses light to consist of material particles, we are compelled, by its properties, to admit that light acts as if it were material, and that it enters into combi- nations with bodies, in order to produce the effects which we have enumerated. When a beam of light falls upon a body, and the whole or a part of that which enters its substance totally disappears, we are entitled to say, that it is detained by some power exercised by the particles of the body over the particles of light. When this light is said to be lost by a multitude of reflections or refractions, the statement is net only hypotheti- cal, but it is an hypothesis incompatible with optical principles. That the light detained within bodies has been stopped by the attractive force of the par- ticles seems to be highly probable, and the mind will not feel any repugnance to admit that the par- ticles of all bodies, whether solid, fluid, or aeriform, have a specific affinity for the particles of light. Considering light, therefore, as material, it is not difficult to comprehend how it should, like other elementary substances, enter into combination with bodies, and produce many chymical and physical effects, but particularly the phenomena of transpa- rency, opacity, and colour. In transparent colourless bodies, such as water and glass, the intromitted light experiences a con- siderable loss, because a certain number of its par- ticles are attracted and detained by the atoms of the water or glass, and the light which emerges is 94 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. colourless, because the particles exercise a propor- tional action over all the simple colours which compose white light. When the transparent body has any decided colour, such as those enumerated in Class L, then the particles of the- body have exercised a specific attraction over those rays of white light which are complementary to those which compose the colour of the transmitted light. If the transparent body, for example, is red, then its particles have detained the green rays which entered into the incident light, or certain other rays, which with the red are neces- sary to compose white light. In compound bodies, like some of the artificial glasses, the particles will attract and detain rays of light of different colours, as may be seen by analyzing the transmitted light with a prism, which will exhibit a spectrum deprived of all the rays which have been detained. In black bodies the particles exercise a powerful attraction over light, and detain all the intromitted rays. When coloured bodies are opaque, so as to ex- hibit their colours principally by reflection, the light which is reflected back to the observer has received its colour from transmission through part of the thickness of the body, or, what is the same thing, the colour reflected to the eye is complementary to that which has been detained by the particles of the body while the light is passing and repassing through a thickness terminated by the reflecting surfaces ; and as only a part of this light is reflected, as in the case of leaves and flowers, the transmitted light must have the same colour as the reflected light. When coloured bodies exhibit two different colours complementary to each other, the one seen by re- flection and the other by transmission, it is then highly probable that the colours are those of thin plates, though there are still other optical principles to which they may be referred. As the particles of NEW THEORY OF COLOURS. 95 | bodies, and the medium which unites them, or. as the different atoms of a compound body may have different dispersive powers, while they exercise the same refractive force over a particular part of the spectrum, the rays for which this compensation takes place will be transmitted, while part of the complementary light is reflected.* Or in cases where the refractive and dispersive powers are the same, the reflective forces of the particles may vary according to a different law, so that at the separat- ing surfaces either white or coloured light may be reflected.f In those cases of colour where the reflected and the transmitted tints are not complementary, as in leaf-gold, where the former is yellow and the latter green; — in leaf -silver, where they are white and blue, and in certahTpieees of fir-wood, where the reflected light is whitish yellow, and the transmitted light a brilliant homogeneous red, we may explain the sepa- ration of the colours either by the principles we have already laid down or by the doctrine of 'thin plates. On the first principle, the colour of the re- flected light, which is supposed to be the same as that of the transmitted light, will be modified by the law according to which the particles of the body attract different rays out of the beam of white light. In pitch, for example, the blue rays are first ab- sorbed, so that at small thicknesses the transmitted light is a fine yellow, while, by the action of a greater thickness, the yellow itself is absorbed, and the transmitted light is a bright homogeneous red. Now in leaf-gold the transmitted colour of thinner films than we can obtain may be yellow, and, con- sequently, the light reflected from the first strata of interrupting faces will be yellow, and will determine the predominant tint of the reflected light. On the Newtonian doctrine, Mr. Herschel has explained it * See the Phil. Trans. 1829, Part I. p. 189. 96 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. by saying", " that the transmitted rays have traversed the whole thickness of the medium, and therefore undergo many more times the action of its atoms than those reflected, especially those near the first surface to which the brighter part of the reflected colour is due." The phenomena of the absorption of common and polarized light, which I have described in an- other place,* throw much light on the subject of coloured bodies. The relation of the absorbent ac tion to the axes of double refraction, and, conse- quently, to the poles of the molecules of the crystal, shows how the particles of light attracted by the molecules of the body will vary, both in their nature and number, according to the direction in which they approach the molecules ; and explains how the colour of a body may be changed, either tempora- rily or permanently, by heat, according as it pro- duces a temporary or a permanent change in the relative position of the molecules. This is not the place to enlarge on this subject ; but we may be permitted to apply the idea to the curious experi- ment of Thenard on phosphorus. When this sub- stance is rendered pure by repeated distillation, it is transparent, and transmits yellow light ; but when it is thrown in a melted state into cold water, it becomes jet black. When again melted, it resumes its original colour and transparency. According to the Newtonian theory, we must suppose that the atoms of the phosphorus have been diminished in size by sudden cooling, — an effect which it is not easy to comprehend; but, according to the pre- ceding views, we may suppose that the atoms of the phosphorus have been forced by sudden cooling into relative positions quite different from those which they take when they slowly assume the solid state, and their poles of maximum attraction, in * Phil. Trans. 1819, p. 11. NEW THEORY OF COLOURS. 9? place of being turned to one another, are turned in {different directions, and then allowed to exercise their full action in attracting the intromitted light, and detaining it wholly within the body.* Before concluding this chapter, there is one topic peculiarly deserving our notice, namely, the change of colour produced in bodies by continued exposure to light. The general effect of light is to diminish or dilute the colours of bodies, and in many cases to deprive them entirely of their colour. Now, it is not easy to understand how repeated undulations propagated through a body could diminish the size of its particles, or how the same effect could be produced by a multitude of reflections from particle to particle. But if light is attracted by the particles of bodies, and combines with them, it is easy to conceive that, when the molecules of a body have combined with a great number of particles of a green colour, for example, their power of combina- tion with others will be diminished, and, conse- quently, the number of particles of any colour (absorbed or detained must diminish with the time that the body has been exposed to light ; that is, [these particles must enter into the transmitted and ((reflected pencils, and diminish the intensity of their colour. If the body, for example, absorbs red light, and transmits and reflects green, then if the quan- tity of absorbed red light is diminished, it will enter into the reflected and transmitted pencils, and, form- ing white light by its mixture with a portion of the green rays, will actually dilute them in the same manner as if a portion of white light had been added.f * If this view of the matter be just, we should expect that the specific gravity of the black would exceed that of the yellow phosphorus. t Since the two preceding chapters were written, I have had occasion to confirm and extend the views which they contain by many new ex- periments. 08 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. CHAPTER VIII. Newton's Discoveries respecting the Inflection or Diffraction of Light — Previous Discoveries of Grimaldi and Dr. Hooke — Labours of sue* ceeding Philosophers— Law of Interference of Dr. Young— FresneVt Discoveries — New Theory of Inflection on the Hypothesis of the Ma- teriality of Light. ALTHOUGH the discoveries of Newton respectin^ the Inflection of Light were first published in hisl Optics in 1704, yet there is reason to think that they were made at a much earlier period. Sir Isaac,; indeed, informs us, in his preface to that great worfy that the third book, which contains these discove- ries, " was put together out of scattered papers ;'* and he adds at the end of his observations, that " he designed to repeat most of them with more care and exactness, and to make some new ones for determin- ing the manner how the rays of light are bent in their passage by bodies, for making the fringes of colours with the dark lines between them. But I was then interrupted, and cannot now think of taking these things into consideration." On the 18th March, 1674, Dr. Hooke had read a valuable memoir on the phe- nomena of diffraction ; and, as Sir Isaac makes no allusion whatever to this work, it is the more proba- ble that his " scattered papers" had been written previous to the communication of Dr. Hooke's ex- periments. The phenomena of the inflection of light were first discovered by Francis Maria Grimaldi, a learned Jesuit, who has described them in a posthumous work published in 1665, two years after his death.* Having admitted a be am of the sun's light through * Pkysieo-Mathesis de Lumine coloribus et iride aliisyue^annexit, Bonon 1666. INFLECTION OF LIGHT. 3$ a small pin-hole in a piece of lead or card into a dark chamber, he found that the light diverged from this aperture in the form of a cone, and that the shadows of all bodies placed in this light were not only larger than might have been expected, but were surrounded with three coloured fringes, the nearest the widest, and the most remote the narrowest. [n strong light he discovered analogous fringes within the shadows of bodies, which increased in number with the breadth of the body, and became more distinct when the shadow was received obliquely and at a greater distance. When two small aper- ;ures or pin-holes were placed so near each other that the cones of light formed by each of them ntersected one another, Grimaldi observed, that a spot common to the circumference of each, or, which s the same thing, illuminated by rays from each eone, was darker than the same spot when illumi- nated by either of the cones separately ; and he an- nounces this remarkable fact in the following para- doxical proposition, " that a body actually illuminated^ may become more dark by adding a light to that which \ t already receives" Without knowing what had been done by the kalian philosopher, our countryman, Dr. Robert looke, had been diligently occupied with the same subject. In 4§7&. he communicated his first obser- vations to the Royal Society, and he then spoke of lis paper as " containing the discovery of a new >roperty of light not mentioned by any optical wri- ;ers before him." In his paper of 1674, already mentioned, and which is no doubt the one to~ which he alludes, he has not only described the leading phenomena of the inflection, or the deflection of light, as he calls it, but he has. distinctly announced the doctrine of interference, which has performed so great a part in the subsequent history of optics.* This doctrme is thus announced. 1. That the same rays of light upon the same point of an object will turn into all sorts of colour* 100 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. Such was- the state of the subject when Newton directed to it his powers of acute and accurate ob- servation. His attention was turned only to the enlargement of the shadow, and to the three fringes which surrounded it ; and he begins his observations by ascribing the discovery of these facts to Gri- maldi. After taking exact measures of the diameter of the shadow of a human hair, and of the breadth of the fringes at different distances behind it, he discovered the remarkable fact that these diame- ters and breadths were not proportional to the dis- tances from the hair at which they were measured. In order to explain these phenomena, Newton sup- posed that the rays which passed by the edge of the hair are deflected or turned aside from it, as if by a repulsive force, the nearest rays suffering the great- est, and those more remote a less degree of deflec- tion. Fig. 10. by the various inclination of the object. 2. That colours begin to appear when two pulses of light are blended so well and so near together that the sense takes them for one. INFLECTION OF LIGHT. tfl Thus, if X, fig. 10, represents a section of the hair, and AB, CD, EF, GH, &c. rays passing at dif- ferent distances from X, the ray AB will be more deflected than CD, and will cross it at m, the ray CD will for the same reason cross EF at n, and EF will cross GH at o. Hence the curve or caustic formed by the intersections m, n, o, &c. will be con- vex outward, its curvature diminishing as it recedes from the vertex. As none of the passing light can possibly enter within this curve, it will form the boundary of the shadow of X. The explanation given by Sir Isaac of the coloured fringes is less precise, and can be inferred only from the two following queries. 1. "Do not the rays which differ in refrangibility differ also in flexibility, and are they not, by these different inflections separated from one another, so as after separation to make the colours in the three fringes above described 1 And after what manner are they inflected to make those fringes 1 2. " Are not *the rays of light in passing by the edges and sides of bodies bent several times back- wards and forwards with a motion like that of an eel ? And do not the three fringes of light above mentioned arise from three such bendings ?" The idea thus indistinctly thrown out in the pre- ceding queries has been ingeniously interpreted by Mr. Herschel in the manner represented in fig. 11, where SS are two rays passing by the edge of the body MN. These rays are supposed to undergo several bendings, as at a, b, c, and the particles of light are thrown off at one or other of the points of contrary flexure, according to the state of their fits or other circumstances. Those that are thrown outwards in the direction «A, &B, cC, dD, will produce as many caustics by their intersections as there are deflected rays; and each caustic, when re- ceived on a screen at a distance, will depict on it the brightest part or maximum of a fringe. 12 102 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. Fig. 11. S S In this unsatisfactory state was the subject of the inflection of light left by Sir Isaac. His inquiries were interrupted, and never again renewed; and though he himself found that the phenomena were the same, " whether the hair was encompassed with air or with any other pellucid substance," yet this important result does not seem to have shaken his conviction, that the phenomena had their origin in the action of bodies upon light. During two sets of experiments which I made on the inflection of light, the first in 1798, and the second in 1812 and 1813, 1 was desirous of examin- ing the influence of density and refractive power over the fringes produced by inflection. T com- DR. YOUNG'S LAW OF INTERFERENCE. 103 pared the fringes formed by gold-leaf with those formed by masses of gold, — and those produced by films which gave the colours of thin plates with those formed by masses of the same substance. I examined the influence of platinum, diamond, and cork in inflecting light, the effect of non-reflecting grooves and spaces in polished metals, and of cylin- ders of glass immersed in a mixture of oil of cassia and oil of olives of the same refractive power; and, as the fringes had the same magnitude and charac- ter under all these circumstances, I concluded that they were not produced by any force inherent in the bodies themselves, but arose from a property of the light itself, which always showed itself when light was stopped in its progress. Dr. Thomas Young, who had supported with great ingenuity and force of argument the undulatory theory of light, as maintained by Hooke and Huy- gens, was the first who gave a plausible explana- tion of the inflection of light. By interposing a small screen at B, fig. 10, and intercepting the rays that passed near the hair X, he was surprised to find that all the fringes within the shadow disap- peared. The same effect took place when the screen intercepted the rays on the other side ; and hence he concluded, that the rays on each side of the hair were necessary to the production of the inner fringes, and that the fringes were produced by the inter" ference of the rays that passed on one side of the hair with those that passed on the other side. In order to account for the coloured fringes without the shadow, Dr. Young conceived that the rays which pass near the edge of the hair interfere with others, which he supposes may be reflected after falling very obliquely upon its edge, — a supposition which, if correct, would certainly produce fringes very similar to those actually observed. In pursuing these researches so successfully begun by Dr. Young, M. Fresnel had the good fortune to 104 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. explain all the phenomena of inflection by means of the undulatory doctrine combined with the principle of interference. In place of transmitting the light through a small aperture, he caused it to diverge from the focus of a deep convex lens, and instead of receiving the shadow and its fringes upon a smooth white surface, as was done by Newton, he viewed them directly with his eye through a lens placed behind the shadow ; and by means of a mi- croscope he was able to measure the dimensions of the fringes with the greatest exactness. By this mode of observation he made the remarkable dis- covery, that the inflection of the light depended on the distance of the inflecting body from the aperture or from the focus of divergence ;* the fringes being ob- served to dilate as the body approached that focus, and to contract as it receded from it, their relative distances from each other, and from the margin of the shadow continuing invariable. In attempting to account for the formation of the exterior fringes, M. Fresnel found it necessary to reject the supposition of Dr. Young, that they were owing to light re- flected from the edge of the body. He not only ascertained that the real place of the fringe was the •nnjth of a millimetre different from what it should be on that supposition, but he found that the fringes preserved the same intensity of light, whether the inflecting body had a round or a sharp edge, and even when the edge was such as not to afford suffi- cient light for their production. From this difficulty the undulatory theory speedily released him, and he was led by its indications to consider the exterior fringes, as produced by an infinite number of ele- mentary waves of light emanating from a primitive wave when partly interrupted by an opaque body. The various phenomena of inflection, which had * This effect is so great, that at the distance of four inches from the point of divergence, the angular inflexion of the red rays of the first fringe is 12' 6", while at the distance of about twenty feet, it is onlv 3' 55" NEW THEORY OF INFLECTION. 105 so long resisted every effort to generalize them, having thus received so beautiful and satisfactory an explanation from the undulatory doctrine, they must of course be regarded as affording to that doctrine the most powerful support, while the Newtonian hypothesis of the materiality of light is proportion- ally thrown into the shade. It is impossible, indeed, even for national partiality to consider the views of Newton as furnishing any explanation of the facts discovered by Fresnel ; and, as no attempt has been made by the small though able phalanx of his dis- ciples to stay the decision with which, on this count at least, the doctrine of emission has been threat- ened, we shall venture to suggest some principles by which the refractory phenomena may perhaps be yet brought within the pale of the Newtonian theory. _ That the particles of light, like those of heat, ^ are endowed with a repulsive force which prevents them from accumulating when in a state of conden- sation, or when they are detained by the absorptive action of opaque bodies, will be readily admitted. By this power a beam of light radiating from a luminous point has, in every azimuth, the same de- I gree of intensity at the same distance from its centre of divergence ; but if we intercept a portion of such ! a beam by an opaque body, the repulsive force of the light which formerly occupied its shadow is with- drawn, and consequently the rays which pass near the body will be repelled into the shadow, and will form, by their interference with those similarly re- pelled on the other side, the interior fringes, which are parallel to the edges of the body. The rays which pass at a greater distance will in like manner be bent towards the body, but with less force, and, interfering with those rays which retain their primi- tive direction, from the state of their fits or the position of their poles, they will form the exterior fringes. When the inflecting body is placed near 1€0 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. the point of divergence, the greater proximity of the rays will produce a greater repulsive force, and consequently a greater inflection of the passing light ; while the removal of the body from the point of divergence will be accompanied with an increased distance of the particles, an inferior repulsive force, and a feebler inflection. As the phenomena of in- flection, considered under this aspect, arise from a property of the light itself, it follows that they will remain invariable, whatever be the nature or den- sity of the body, or the form of the edge which acts upon the passing rays. CHAPTER IX. Miscellaneous Optical Researches of Newton— ffis Experiments on Refraction— His Conjecture respecting the Inflammability of the Diamond — His Law of Double Refraction — His Observations on the Polarization of Light—Newton's Theory of Light— His "Optics* BEFORE concluding our account of Newton's op- tical discoveries, it is necessary to notice some of his minor researches, which, though of inferior im- portance in the science of light, have either exer- cised an influence over the progress of discovery, or been associated with the history of other branches of knowledge. One of the most curious of these inquiries related to the connexion between the refractive powers and the chymical composition of bodies. Having meas- ured the refractive powers and the densities of twenty- two substances, he found that the forces which reflect and refract light are very nearly proportional to the densities of the same bodies. In^ this law, however, he noticed a remarkable exception in the case of unctuous and sulphureous bodies, such as camphire, olive oil, linseed oil, spirit of turpentine, DOUBLE REFRACTION OF LIGHT. 107 and diamond, which have their refractive powers two or three times greater in respect of their densi- ties than the other substances in the table, while among themselves their refractive powers are pro- portional to their densities, without any considerable variation. Hence he concluded that diamond " is an unctuous substance coagulated," — a sagacious prediction, which has been verified in the discoveries of modern chymistry. The connexion between a high degree of inflammability and a great refracting force has been still more strongly established by the high refractive power which I detected in phospho- rus, and which was discovered in hydrogen by MM. Biot and Arago. There is no part of the optical labours of Newton which is less satisfactory than that which relates to the double refraction of light. In 1690, Huygens, published his admirable treatise on light, in which he has given the law of double refraction in calca- reous spar, as deduced from his theory of light, and as confirmed by direct experiment. Viewing it probably as a theoretical deduction, Newton seems to have regarded it as incorrect, and though he has given Huygens the credit of describing the phe- nomena more exactly than Bartholinus, yet, without assigning any reason, he rejected the law of the Dutch philosopher, and substituted another in its place. These observations of our author form the subject of the twenty-fifth and twenty-sixth queries at the end of his Optics, which was published fourteen years after the appearance of Huygens's work. The law adopted by Newton is not accompanied with any of the experiments from which it was deduced ; and though he has given it without expressing any doubt of its accuracy, it is, nevertheless, entirely incom- patible with observation, and has been rejected by all succeeding philosophers. In his speculations respecting the successive dis- appearance and reappearance of two of the four 108 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. images which are formed when a luminous objecl is viewed through two rhombs of calcareous spar, one of which is made to revolve upon the other. Newton has been more successful. He concluded from these phenomena that every ray of light has two opposite sides originally endued with the prop- erty on which the unusual refraction depends, and other two opposite sides not endued with that prop- erty; and he suggested it as a subject for future inquiry, whether there are not more properties of light by which the sides of the rays differ, and are distinguished from one another. This is the first occasion on which the idea of a polarity in the rays of light has been suggested.* From the various optical inquiries in which New- ton was engaged, he was strongly impressed with the belief that light consists of small material par- ticles emitted from shining substances, and that these particles could be again recombined into solid matter, so that " gross bodies and light were con- vertible into one another." He conceived also that the particles of solid bodies and of light exerted a mutual action upon each other, the former being agitated and heated by the latter, and the latter being attracted and repelled by the former,* with forces depending on the inertia of the luminous par- ticles. These forces he regarded as insensible at all measurable distances, and he conceived that the distances between the particles of bodies were very small when compared with the extent of their sphere of attraction and repulsion. With the exception of Hooke, Huygens, and Euler, almost all the contemporaries and successors of Newton maintained the doctrine of the mate- riality of light. It was first successfully assailed by Dr. Thomas Young, and since that time it has been shaken to its foundation by those great discoveries ': * See the twenty-ninth query at the end of his Optics, where the sides of a ray are compared with the poles of a magnet. OPTICS. 109 which have illustrated the commencement of the present century. The undulatory theory, which has thus triumphed in its turn, is still subject to grave difficulties, and we fear another century must elapse before a final decision can be pronounced on this Jong-agitated question. The most important of the optical discoveries of Newton, of which we have given a general history, were communicated to the Royal Society in de- tached papers ; but the disputes in which they had involved their author made him hesitate about the publication of his other discoveries. Although he had drawn up a connected view of his labours under the title of " Opticks, or a Treatise on the Reflex- ions, Refractions, Inflexions, and Colours of Light," yet he resolved not to publish this work during the life of Hooke, by whose rival jealousy his tranquillity had been so frequently interrupted. Hooke, how- ever, died in 1702, and the Optics of Newton ap- peared in English in 1704. Dr. Samuel Clark pro- posed a Latin edition of it, which appeared in 1706, and he was generously presented by Sir Isaac with 500/. (or 100/. for each of his five children), as a token of the approbation and gratitude of the author. Both the English and the Latin editions have been frequently reprinted both in England and on the Continent,* and there perhaps never was a work of profound science so widely circulated * Tfce English edition was reprinted at London in 1714, 1721, and 1730, and the Latin one at London in 1706, 1719, 1721, 1728, at Lausanne in 1740, aud at Padua in 1773. 110 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. CHAPTER X. Astronomical Discoveries of Newton— Necessity of combined Exertion to the Completion of great Discoveries — Sketch of the History of As- tronomy previous to the Time of Newton — Copernicus, 1473-1543 — Tycho Brake, 1546-1601— Kepler, 1571-1631— Galileo, 1564-1642. FROM the optical labours of Newton we now pro- ceed to the history of his astronomical discoveries — those transcendent deductions of human reason by which he has secured to himself an immortal name, and vindicated the intellectual dignity of his species. Pre-eminent as his triumphs have been, it would be unjust to affirm that they were achieved by his single arm. The torch of many a preceding age had thrown its light into the strongholds of the material universe, and the grasp of many a pow- erful hand had pulled down the most impregnable of its defences. An alliance, indeed, of many kindred spirits had been long struggling in this great cause, and Newton was but the leader of their mighty phalanx, — the director of their combined genius, — the general who won the victory, and therefore wears its laurels. The history of science presents us with no ex- ample of an individual mind throwing itself far in advance of its contemporaries. It is only in the career of crime and ambition that reckless man takes the start of his species, and, uncurbed by moral and religious restraint, erects an unholy dy- nasty upon the ruins of ancient and venerable insti- tutions. The achievements of intellectual power, though often begun by one mind and completed by another, have ever been the results of combined ex- ertions. Slow in their growth, they gradually ap- proximate to a more perfect condition : — the variety ASTRONOMICAL DISCOVERIES. Ill i» the phenomena of nature call forth a variety of intellectual gifts ; — the powers of analysis and com- bination are applied to the humbler labours of obser vation and experiment, and in the ordeal of rival inquiry truth is finally purified from error. How different is it with those systems which the imagi- nation rears, — those theories of wild import which are directed against the consciences and hopes of man. The fatal upas-tree distils its poison in the spring as well as the autumn of its growth, but the fruit which sustains life must have its bud prepared before the approach of winter, its blossom expanded in the spring, and its juices elaborated by the light and heat of the summer and the autumnal sun. In the century which preceded the birth of New- ton the science of astronomy advanced with the most rapid steps. Emerging from the darkness of the middle ages, the human mind seemed to rejoice in its new-born strength, and to apply itself with elastic vigour to unfold the mechanism of the heavens. The labours of Hipparchus and Ptolemy had indeed furnished many important epochs and supplied many valuable data ; but the cumbrous appendages of cycles and epicycles with which they explained the stations and retrogradations of the planets, and the vulgar prejudices which a false interpretation of Scripture had excited against a belief in the motion of the earth, rendered it difficult even for great minds to escape from the trammels of authority, and appeal to the simplicity of nature. The sovereign of Castile, the generous and noble- minded Alphonso, had long before proscribed the rude expedients of his predecessors ; and when he declared that if the heavens were thus constituted, he could have given the Deity good advice, he must not only have felt the absurdity of the prevailing system, but must have obtained some foresight of a more simple arrangement. But neither he nor the astronomers whom he so liberally protected seem to 112 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. have established a better system, and it was left to Copernicus to enjoy the dignity of being the restorer of astronomy. This great man, a native of Thorn in Prussia, fol- lowing his father's profession, began his career as a doctor of medicine, but an accidental attendance on the mathematical lectures of Brudzevius excited a love for astronomy, which became the leading pas- sion of his life. Quitting a profession uncongenial to such pursuits, he went to Bologna to study astronomy under Dominic Maria ; and after having enjoyed the friendship and instruction of that able philosopher, he established himself at Rome in the humble situation of a teacher of mathematics. Here he made numerous astronomical observations which served him as the basis of future researches ; but an event soon occurred which, though it interrupted for a while his important studies, placed him in a situation for pursuing them with new zeal. The death of one of the canons enabled his uncle, who was Bishop of Ermeland, to appoint him to a can- onry in the chapter of Frauenburg, where, in a house situated on the brow of a mountain, he con- tinued, in peaceful seclusion, to carry on his astro- nomical observations. During his residence at Rome his talents had been so well appreciated, that the Bishop of Fossombrona, who presided over the council for reforming the calendar, solicited the aid of Copernicus in this desirable undertaking. At first he entered warmly into the views of the council, and charged himself with the determination of the length of the year and of the month, and of the other motions of the sun and moon that seemed to be required ; but he found the task too irksome, and probably felt that it would interfere with those interesting discoveries which had already begun to dawn upon his mind. Copernicus is said to have commenced his inqui- ries by an historical examination of the opinions of COPERNICUS. 13 ancient authors on the system of the universe ; buf it is more likely that he sought for the authority of I their great names to countenance liis peculiar views, and that he was more desirous to present his own theory as one that he had received, rather than as one which he had invented. His mind had been long imbued with the idea that simplicity and har- mony should characterize the arrangements of the planetary system, and, in the complication and dis- order which reigned in the hypothesis of Ptolemy, he saw insuperable objections to its being regarded as a representation of nature. In the opinions of the Egyptian sages, in those of Pythagoras, Philo- laus, Aristarchus, and Nicetas, he recognised his own earliest conviction that the earth was not the centre of the universe ; but he appears to have con- sidered it as still possible that our globe might per- form some function in the system more important than that of the other planets; and his attention was much occupied with the speculation of Martia- nus Capella, who placed the sun between Mars and the moon, and made Mercury and Venus revolve round him as a centre; and with the system of Apollonius Pergaeus, who made all the planets re- volve round the sun, while the sun and moon were carried round the earth in the centre of the universe. The examination, however, of these hypotheses gradually dispelled the difficulties with which the subject was beset ; and after the labours of more than thirty years, he was permitted to see the true system of the heavens. The sun he considered as immoveable in the centre of the system, while the earth revolved between the orbits of Venus and Mars, and produced by its rotation about its axis all the diurnal phenomena of the celestial sphere. The precession of the equinoxes was thus referred to a slight motion of the earth's axis, and the stations and retrogradations of the planets were the neces- sary consequence of their own motions combined K2 114 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. with that of the earth about the sun. These re- markable views were supported by numerous as- tronomical observations; and in 1530 Copernicus brought to a close his immortal work on the Revolu- tions of the Heavenly Bodies. But while we admire the genius which triumphed over so many difficulties, we cannot fail to commend the extraordinary prudence with which he ushered his new system into the world. Aware of the preju- dices, and' even of the hostility with which such a system would be received, he resolved neither to startle the one nor provoke the other. He allowed his opinions to circulate in the slow current of per- sonal communication. The points of opposition which they presented to established doctrines were gradually worn down, and they insinuated them- selves into reception among the ecclesiastical circles by the very reluctance of their author to bring them into notice. In the year 1534, Cardinal Schonberg, Bishop of Capua, and Gyse, Bishop of Culm, exerted all their influence to induce Copernicus to lay his system before the world ; but he resisted their so- licitations ; and it was not till 1539 that an accidental circumstance contributed to alter his resolution. George Rheticus, professor of mathematics at Wir- temberg, having heard of the labours of Copernicus, resigned his chair, and repaired to Frauenberg to make himself master of his discoveries. This zeal- ous disciple prevailed upon his master to permit the publication of his system ; and they seem to have arranged a plan for giving it to the world without alarming the vigilance of the church, or startling the prejudices of individuals. Under the disguise of a student of mathematics, Rheticus published in 1540 an account of the manuscript volume of Coper- nicus. This pamphlet was received without any disapprobation, and its author was encouraged to reprint it at Basle, in 1541, with his own name. The success of these publications, and the flattering TYCHO BRAKE. 115 manner in which the new astronomy was received by several able writers, induced Copernicus to place his MSSj in the hands of Rheticus. It was accord- ingly printed at the expense of Cardinal Schon- berg, and appeared at Nuremberg in 1543. Its illus- trious author, however, did not live to peruse it. A complete copy was handed to him in his last moments, and he saw and touched it a few hours before his death. This great work was dedicated to the Holy Pontiff, in order, as Copernicus himself says, that the authority of the head of the church might silence the calumnies of individuals who had attacked his views by arguments drawn from reli- gion. Thus introduced, the Copernican system met with no ecclesiastical opposition, and gradually made its way in spite of the ignorance and prejudices of the age. Among the astronomers who provided the mate- rials of the Newtonian philosophy the name of Tycho Brahe merits a conspicuous place. De- scended from an ancient Swedish family, he was born at Knudstorp, in Norway, in 1546, three years after the death of Copernicus. The great eclipse of the sun which happened on the 26th August, 1560, while he was at the University of Copenhagen, attracted his notice : and when he found that all its phenomena had been accurately predicted, he was seized with the most irresistible passion to ac- quire the knowledge of a science so infallible in its results. Destined for the profession of the law, his friends discouraged the pursuit which now engrossed his thoughts; and such were the reproaches and even persecutions to which he was exposed, that he quitted his country with the design of travelling through Germany. At the very commencement of his journey, however, an event occurred in which the impetuosity of his temper had nearly cost him his life. At a wedding-feast in Rostock, a question- able point in geometry involved him in a dispute 116 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. with a Banish nobleman of the same temperament with himself ; and the two mathematicians B^solved to settle the difference by the sword. /Tycjio, however, seems to have been second in the conflict, for he lost the greater part of his nose, and was obliged to supply its place by a substitute of gold and silver, which a cement of glue attached to his face. ^During his stay at Augsburg lie inspired the burgomaster of the city, Peter Hainzell, with a love of astronomy. This public-spirited citizen erected an excellent observatory at his own expense, and here Tycho began that distinguished career which has placed him in the first rank of practical as- tronomers. Upon his return to Copenhagen in 1570, he was received with every mark of respect. The king in- vited him to court, and persons of all ranks harassed him with their attentions. At Herritzvold, near his native place, the house of his maternal uncle afforded him a retreat from the gayeties of the capital, and he was there offered every accommodation for the prosecution of his astronomical studies. Here, however, the passion of love and the pursuits of alchymy distracted his thoughts ; but though the peasant girl of whom he was enamoured was of easier attainment than the philosopher's stone, the marriage produced an open quarrel with his relations, which it required the interference of the king to allay. In the tranquillity of domestic happiness, Tycho re- sumed his study of the heavens, and in 1572 he enjoyed the singular good fortune of observing, through all its variations, the new star in Cassiopeia, which appeared with such extraordinary splendour as to be visible in the daytime, and which gradually disappeared in the following year. Dissatisfied with his residence in Denmark, Tycho resolved to settle in some distant country ; and hav- ing gone as far as Venice in search of a suitable residence, he at last fixed upon Basle, in Switzer* TYCHO BRAKE. 117 land. The King of Denmark, however, had learned his intention from the Prince of Hesse ; and when Tycho returned to Copenhagen to remove his family and his instruments, his sovereign announced to him his resolution to detain him in his kingdom. He presented him with j the canonry of Roschild, with an income of 2000 crowns per annum. To this he added a pension of 1000 crowns ; and he promised to give him the island of Huen, with a complete observatory erected under his own eye. This gene- rous offer was instantly accepted. The celebrated observatory of Uraniburg was established at the expense of about 20,000/. ; and in this magnificent retreat Tycho continued for twenty-one years to en- rich astronomy with the most valuable observations. Admiring disciples crowded to this sanctuary of the sciences to acquire the knowledge of the heavens ; and kings* and princes felt themselves honoured by becoming the guests of the great astronomer of the age. One of the principal discoveries of Tycho was that of the inequality of the moon's motion, called the variation. He detected, also, the annual equa- tion which affects the place of her apogee and nodes, and he determined the greatest and the least inclina- tion of the lunar orbit. His observations on the planets were numerous and precise, and have formed the data of the present generalizations in astronomy. * When James I. went to Copenhagen in 1590, to'conclude his mar- riage with the Princess Anne of Denmark, he spent eight days under the roof of Tycho at Uranihurg. As a token of his gratitude, he com- posed a set of Latin verses in honour of the astronomer, and left him a magnificent present at his departure. He gave him also his royal license for the publication of his works in England, and accompanied it with the following complimentary letter : — " Nor am I acquainted with these things on the relation of others, or from a mere perusal of your works, but I have seen them with my own eyes, and heard them with my own ears, in your residence at Urani burg, during the various learned and agreeable conversations which I there held with you, which even now affect my mind to such a degree, that it is difficult to decide whether I recollect them with greater pleasure or admiration." 118 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. Though thus skilful in the observation of phenomena, his mind was but little suited to investigate their cause, and it was probably owing to this defect that he rejected the system of Copernicus. The vanity of giving his own name to another system was not likely to actuate a mind such as his, and it was more probable that he was led to adopt the immobility of the earth, and to make the sun, with all his attendant planets, circulate round it, from the great difficulty which still presented itself by comparing the apparent diameter of the stars with the annual parallax of the earth's orbit. The death of Frederick in 1588 proved a severe calamity to Tycho, and to the science which he cul- tivated. During the first years of the minority of Christian IV. the regency continued the royal patron- age to the observatory of Uraniburg; and in 1592 the young king paid a visit of some days to Tycho, and left him a gold chain in token of his favour. The astronomer, however, had made himself enemies at court, and the envy of his high reputation had probably added fresh malignity to the irritation of personal feelings. Under the ministry of Wolchen- dorf, a name for ever odious to science, Tycho's pension was stopped ; — he was in 1597 deprived of the canonry of Roschild, and was thus forced, with his wife and children, to seek an asylum in a foreign land. His friend, Henry Rantzau, of Wansbeck, under whose roof he found a hospitable shelter, was fortunately acquainted with the emperor Rodolph II., who, to his love of science, added a passion for alchymy and astrology. The reputation of Tycho having already reached the imperial ear, the recom- mendation of Rantzau was scarcely necessaiy to en- sure him his warmest friendship. Invited by the em- peror, he repaired in 1599 to Prague, where he met with the kindest reception. A pension of three thousand crowns was immediately settled upon him, and a commodious observatory erected for his use TYCHO BRAKE. 119 In the vicinity of that city. Here the exiled astrono- mer renewed with delight his interrupted labours, and the gratitude which he cherished for the royal favour increased the satisfaction which he felt in having so unexpectedly found 3. resting-place for approaching age. These prospects of better days were enhanced by the good fortune of receiving two such men as Kepler and Longomontanus for his pupils ; but the fallacy of human anticipation was here, as in so many other cases, strikingly displayed. Tycho was not aware of the inroads which both his labours and his disappointments had made upon his constitution. Though surrounded with affectionate friends and admiring disciples, he was still an exile in a foreign land. Though his country had been base in its ingratitude, it was yet the land which he loved, — the scene of his earliest affection, — the theatre of his scientific glory. These feelings con- tinually preyed upon his mind, and his unsettled spirit was ever hovering among his native mountains. In this condition he was attacked with a disease of the most painful kind, and though the paroxysms of its agonies had lengthened intermissions, yet he saw that death was approaching. He implored his pupils to persevere in their scientific labours. He conversed with Kepler on some of the profoundest points of astronomy, and with these secular occupations he mingled frequent acts of piety and devotion. In this happy condition he expired without pain at the age of fifty-five, the unquestionable victim of the councils of Christian IV. Notwithstanding the accessions which astronomy had received from the labours of Copernicus and Tycho, no progress was 'yet made in developing the general laws of the system, and scarcely an idea had been formed of the power by which the planets were retained in their orbits. The labours of as- siduous observers had supplied the materials for this 120 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. purpose, and Kepler arose to lay the foundations of physical astronomy. John Kepler was born at Wiel, in Wirtemberg, in 1571. He was educated for the church, and dis- charged even some of the clerical functions; but his devotion to science withdrew him from the study of theology. Having received mathematical instruc- tion from the celebrated Maestlinus, he had made such progress in the science, that he was invited in 1594 to fill the mathematical chair of Gratz in Sty- ria. Endowed with a fertile imagination, his mind was ever intent upon subtle and ingenious specula- tions. In the year 1596 he published his peculiar views in a work on the Harmonies and Analogies of Nature. In this singular production, he attempts to solve what he calls the great cosmographical mys- tery of the admirable proportion of the planetary orbits ; and by means of the six regular geometrical solids,* he endeavours to assign a reason why there are six planets, and why the dimensions of their orbits and the time of their periodical revolutions were such as Copernicus had found them.. If a cube, for example, were inserted in a sphere, of which Saturn's orbit was one of the great circles, it would, he supposed, touch by its six planes the lesser sphere of Jupiter ; and, in like manner, he proposes to determine, by the aid of the other geometrical solids, the magnitude of the spheres of the other planets. A copy of this work was presented by its author to Tycho Brahe, who had been too long versed in the severe realities of observation to at- tach any value to such wild theories. He advised his young friend " first to lay a solid foundation for his views by actual observation, and then, by ascend- ing from these, to strive to reach the causes of things ;" and there is reason to think that, by the aid of the whole Baconian philosophy, thus compressed * The cube, the sphere, the tetrahedron, the octahedron, the dodeca- hedron, and the icosahedron. KEPLER. 121 by anticipation into a single sentence, he abandoned for a while his visionary inquiries. In the year 1598 Kepler suffered persecution for his religious principles, and was compelled to quit Gratz ; but though he was recalled by the States of Styria, he felt his situation insecure, and accepted of a pressing invitation from Tycho to settle at Prague, and assist him in his calculations. Having arrived in Bohemia in 1600, he was introduced by his friends to the Emperor Rodplph, from whom he ever after- ward received the kindest attention. On the death of Tycho in 1601, he was appointed mathematician to the emperor, — a situation in which he was con- tinued during the successive reigns of Matthias and Ferdinand; but what was of more importance to science, he was put in possession of the valuable collection of Tycho's observations. These obser- vations were remarkably numerous ; and as the orbit of Mars was more oval than that of any of the other planets, they were peculiarly suitable for determin- ing its real form. The notions of harmony and symmetry in the construction of the solar system, which had filled the mind of Kepler, necessarily led him to believe that the planets revolved with a uni- form motion in circular orbits. So firm, indeed, was this conviction, that he made numerous attempts to represent the observations of Tycho by this hy- pothesis. The deviations were too great to be as- cribed to errors of observation ; and in trying various other curves, he was led to the discovery that Mars revolved round the sun in an elliptical orbit, in one of the foci of which the sun itself was placed. The same observations enabled him to determine the dimensions of the planet's orbit, and by comparing together the times in which Mars passed over different portions of its orbit, he found that they were to one another as the areas described by the lines drawn from the centre of the planet to the centre of the sun, or, in more technical terms, that L 122 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. the radius vector describes equal areas in equal times. These two remarkable discoveries, the nrst that were ever made in physical astronomy, were extended to all the other planets of the system, and were communicated to the world in 1609, in his " Commentaries on the Motions of the Planet Mars, as deduced from the observations of Tycho Brahe." Although our author was conducted to these great laws by the parent examination of well-established facts, his imagination was ever hurrying him among the wilds of conjecture. Convinced that the mean distances of the planets from the sun bore to one another some mysterious relation, he not only com- pared them with the regular geometrical solids, but also with the intervals of musical tones ; an idea which the ancient Pythagoreans had suggested, and which had been adopted by Archimedes himself. All these comparisons were fruitless ; and Kepler was about to abandon an inquiry of about seventeen years' duration, when, on the 8th March, 1618, he conceived the idea of comparing the powers of the different members which express the planetary dis- tances, in place of the numbers themselves. He compared the squares and the cubes of the distances with the same powers of the periodic times ; nay, he tried even the squares of the times with the cubes of the distances ; but his hurry and impatience led him into an error of calculation, and he rejected this law as having no existence in nature ! On the 15th May, his mind again reverted to the same notion, and upon making the calculations anew, and free from error, he discovered the great law, that the squares of the periodic times of any two planets are to one another as the cubes of their distances from the sun. Enchanted with this unexpected result, he could scarcely trust his calculations ; and, to use his own language, he at first believed that he was dreaming, and had taken for granted the very truth of which he was in search. This brilliant discovery was pub- KEPLER. 123 lished in 1619, in his "Harmony of the World';" a I work dedicated to James VI. of Scotland. Thus ! were established what have been called the three i laws of Kepler, — the motion of the planets in ellip- < tical orbits, — the proportionality between the areas • described and their times of description, — and the •relations between the squares of the periodic times !' and the cubes of the distances. The relation of the movements of the planets to the sun, as the general centre of all their orbits, could not fail to suggest to Kepler that some power resided in that luminary by which these various mo- tions were produced ; and he went so far as to con- jecture that this power diminishes as the square of jj the distance of the body on which it was exerted ; i but he immediately rejects this law, and prefers that of the simple distances. In his work on Mars, he ? speaks of gravity as a mutual and corporeal affec- tion between similar bodies. He maintained that the tides were occasioned by the moon's attraction, and that the irregularities of the lunar motions, as detected by Tycho, were owing to the joint actions of the sun and the earth ; but the relation between gravity, as exhibited on the earth's surface, and as 1 conducting the planets in their orbits, required more patience of thought than he could command, and was accordingly left for the exercise of higher powers. The misery in which Kepler lived forms a painful I contrast with the services which he performed to science. The pension on which he subsisted was always in arrears, and though the three emperors whose reigns he adorned directed their ministers to be more punctual in its payment, the disobe- dience of their commands was a source of continued vexation to Kepler. When he retired to Sagan, in Silesia, to spend in retirement the remainder of his days, his pecuniary difficulties became still more harassing. Necessity at last compelled him to apply 124 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. personally for the arrears which were due ; and he accordingly set out in 1630 for Ratisbon; but in consequence of the great fatigue which so long a journey on horseback produced, he was seized with a fever, which carried him off on the 30th Novem- ber, 1630, in the 59th year of his age. While Kepler was thus laying the foundation of physical astronomy, Galileo was busily employed in extending the boundaries of the solar system. This distinguished philosopher was born at Pisa in 1564. He was the son of a Florentine nobleman, and was educated for the medical profession ; but a passion for geometry took possession of his mind, and called forth all his powers. Without the aid of a master, he studied the writings of Euclid and of Archimedes;; and such were his acquirements, that he was ap- pointed by the Grand-duke of Tuscany to the mathe- matical chair of Pisa in the twenty-fifth year of his age. His opposition to the Aristotelian philosophy gained him many enemies, and at the end of three years he quitted Pisa, and accepted of an invitation to the professorship of mathematics at Padua. Here he continued for eighteen years adorning the uni- versity by his name, and diffusing around him a taste for the physical sciences. With the excep- tion of some contrivances of inferior importance, Galileo had distinguished himself by no discovery till he had reached the forty-fifth year of his age. In the year 1609, the same year in which Kepler published his celebrated commentary on Mars, Gali- leo paid a visit to Venice, where he heard, in the course of conversation, that a Dutchman of the name of Jansens had constructed and presented to Prince Maurice an instrument through which he saw distant objects magnified and rendered more distinct, as if they had been brought nearer to the observer. This report was credited by some and disbelieved by others ; but, in the course of a few days, Galileo received a letter from James Badovere at Paris, GALILEO. 120 which placed beyond a doubt the existence of such an instrument. The idea instantly filled his mind as one of the utmost importance to science ; and so thoroughly was he acquainted with the properties of lenses, that he not only discovered the principle of its construction, but was able to complete a tele- scope for his own use. Into one end of a leaden tube he fitted a spectacle-glass plane on one side and convex on the other, and in the other end he placed another spectacle-glass concave on one side and plane on the other. He then applied his eye to the concave glass, and saw objects "pretty large and pretty near him." They appeared three times nearer, and nine times larger in surface, than to the naked eye. He soon after made another, which represented objects above sixty times larger ; and, sparing neither labour nor expense, he finally con- structed an instrument so excellent, as "to show things almost a thousand times larger, and above thirty times nearer to the naked eye." There is, perhaps, no invention that science has presented to man so extraordinary in its nature, and | so boundless in its influence, as that of the tele- I scope. To the uninstructed mind, the power of jj seeing an object a thousand miles distant, as large I and nearly as distinct as if it were brought within I a mile of ,the observer, must seem almost miracu- t lous ; and to the philosopher, even, who thoroughly 1 comprehends the principles upon which it acts, it I must ever appear one of the most elegant applica* | tions of science. To have been the first astronomer |i in whose hands such a gift was placed wras a prefer- i| ence to which Galileo owed much of his future reputation. No sooner had he completed his telescope than he applied it to the heavens, and on the 7th Janu- ary, 1618, the first day of its use, he saw round Jupiter three bright little stars lying in a line par- allel to the ecliptic, two to the east, and one to the L2 126 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. west of the planet. Regarding them as ordinary stars, he never thought of estimating their distances. On the following day, when he accidentally directed his telescope to Jupiter, he was surprised to see the three stars to the west of the planet. To pro- duce this effect it was requisite that the motion of Jupiter should be direct, though, according to calcu- lation, it was actually retrograde. In this dilemma he waited with impatience for the evening of the 9th, but unfortunately the sky was covered with clouds. On the 10th he saw only two stars to the east — a circumstance which he was no longer able to explain by the motion of Jupiter. He was there- fore compelled to ascribe the change to the stars themselves ; and upon repeating his observations on the llth, he no longer doubted that he had dis- covered three planets revolving round Jupiter. On the 13th January he for the first time saw the fourth satellite.* This discovery, though of the utmost importance in itself, derived an additional value from the light which it threw on the true system of the universe. While the earth was the only planet enlightened by a moon, it might naturally be supposed that it alone was habitable, and was therefore entitled to the pre-eminence of occupying the centre of the system ; but the discovery of four moons round a much larger planet deprived this argument of its force, and created a new analogy between the earth and the other planets. When Kepler received the " Sidereal Messenger," the work in which Galileo announced his discovery in 1610, he perused it with the deepest interest ; and while it confirmed and extended his substantial discoveries, it dispelled at; the same time some of those harmonic dreams which still hovered among his thoughts. In the "Dis- * Simon Marius, mathematician to the Marquis of Brandenburg, assures us that he discovered the satellites of Jupiter in November 1609. GALILEO. 127 sertation" which he published on the discovery of Galileo, he expresses his hope that satellites will be discovered round Saturn and Mars, — he conjec- tures that Jupiter has a motion of rotation about his axis,— and states his surprise, that, after what had been written on the subject of telescopes by Baptista Porta, they had not been earlier introduced into observatories. In continuing his observations, Galileo applied his telescope to Venus, and in 1610 he discovered the phases of that planet, which exhibited to him the various forms of the waxing and the waning moon. This fact established beyond a doubt that the planet revolved round the sun, and thus gave an additional blow to the Ptolemaic system. In his observations on the sun, Galileo discovered his spots, and deduced from them the rotation of the central luminary. He observed that the body of Saturn had handles attached to it ; but he was unable to detect the form of its ring, or render visible its minute satellites. On the surface of the moon he discovered her mountains and valleys, and deter- mined the curious fact of her libration, in virtue of which parts of the margin of her disk occasionally appear and disappear. In the Milky Way he de- scried numerous minute stars which the unassisted eye was unable to perceive ; and as the largest fixed stars, in place of being magnified by the telescope, became actually minute brilliant points, he inferred their immense distance as rendered necessary by the Copernican hypothesis. All his discoveries, indeed, furnished fresh arguments in favour of the new system ; and the order of the planets and their re- lation to a central sun may now be considered as established by incontrovertible evidence. While Galileo was occupied with these noble pur- suits at Pisa, to which he had been recalled in 1611, his generous patron, Cosmo II. Grand-duke of Tus- cany, invited him to Florence, that he might purmie 128 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. with uninterrupted leisure his astronomical obser- vations, and carry on his correspondence with the German astronomers. His fame had now resounded through all Europe ; — the strongholds of prejudice and ignorance were unbarred ;— and the most obsti- nate adherents of ancient systems acknowledged the meridian power of the day-star of science. Galileo was ambitious of propagating the great truths which he contributed so powerfully to estab- lish. He never doubted that they would be re- ceived with gratitude by all, — by the philosopher as the -consummation of the greatest efforts of human genius, — and by the Christian as the most transcend- ent displays of Almighty power. But he had mis- taken the disposition of his species, and the charac- ter of the age. That same system of the heavens which had been discovered by the humble eccle- siastic of Frauenberg, which had been patronised by the kindness of a bishop, and .published at the ex- pense of a cardinal, and which the pope himself had sanctioned by the warmest reception, was, after the lapse of a hundred years, doomed to the most violent opposition, as subversive of the doctrines of the Christian faith. On no former occasion has the human mind exhibited such a fatal relapse into intolerance. The age itself had improved in libe- rality ; — the persecuted doctrines themselves had become more deserving of reception ; — the light of the Reformed faith had driven the Catholics from some of their most obnoxious positions ; — and yet, under all these circumstances, the church of Rome unfurled her banner of persecution against the pride of Italy, against the ornament of his species, and against truths immutable and eternal. In consequence of complaints laid before the Holy Inquisition, Galileo was summoned to appear at Rome in 1615, to answer for the heretical opinions which he had promulgated. He was charged with M maintaining: as true the false doctrine held by GALILEO. 129 many, that the sun was immoveable in the centre of the world, and that the earth revolved with a diurnal motion; — with having certain disciples to whom he taught the same doctrine ; — with keeping up a correspondence on the subject with several German mathematicians; — with having published letters on the solar spots, in which he explained the same doctrine as true ; — and with having glossed over with a false interpretation the passages of Scripture which were urged against it." The con- sideration of these charges came before a meeting of the Inquisition, which assembled on the 25th February, 1616 ; and the court, declaring their dis- position to deal gently with the prisoner, pro- aounced the following decree :— " That Cardinal Bellarmine should enjoin Galileo to renounce en- ;irely the above-recited false opinions ; that, on his 'efusal to do so, he should be commanded by the commissary of the Inquisition to abandon the said doctrine, and to cease to teach and defend it ; and ;hat, if he did not obey this command, he should >e thrown into prison." On the 26th of February alileo appeared before Cardinal Bellarmine, and, after receiving from him a gentle admonition, he was commanded by the commissary, in the presence of a notary and witnesses, to desist altogether from lis erroneous opinions ; and it was declared to be unlawful for him in future to teach them in any way whatever, either orally or in his writings. To these commands Galileo promised obedience, and was dismissed from the Inquisition. The mildness of this sentence was no doubt partly owing to the influence of the Grand-duke of Tus- cany, and other persons of rank and influence at the papal court, who took a deep interest in the issue of the trial. Dreading, however, that so slight a punishment might not have the eifect of putting down the obnoxious doctrines, the Inquisition issued a decree denouncing the new opinions as false and 130 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. contrary to the sacred writings, and prohibiting the sale of eveiy book in which they should be main- tained. Thus liberated from his persecutors, Galileo re- turned to Florence, where he pursued his studies with his wonted diligence and ardour. The recanta- tion of his astronomical opinions was so formal and unreserved, that ordinary prudence, if not a sense of personal honour, should have restrained him from unnecessarily bringing them before the world. No anathema was pronounced against his scientific discoveries ; no interdict was laid upon the free exercise of his genius. He was prohibited merely from teaching a doctrine which the church of Rome considered to be injurious to its faith. We might have expected, therefore, that a philosopher so con- spicuous in the eyes of the world would have re- spected the prejudices, however base, of an institu- tion whose decrees formed part of the law of the land, and which possessed the power of life and death within the limits of its jurisdiction. Galileo, however, thought otherwise. A sense of degrada- tion* seems to have urged him to retaliate, and before six years had elapsed, he began to compose his " Cosmical System, or Dialogues on the two greatest Systems of the World, the Ptolemean and the Co- pernican," the concealed object of which is to establish the opinions which he had promised to abandon. In this work the subject is discussed by three speakers, Sagredo, Salviatus, and Simplicius, a peripatetic philosopher, who defends the system of * It is distinctly stated in the sentence of the Inquisition, that Galileo's enemies had charged him with having abjured his opinions in 1616, and affirmed that he had been punished by the Inquisition. In order to re- fute these calumnies, Galileo applied to Cardinal Bellarmine for a certifi- cate to prove that he neither abjured his opinions nor suffered any pun- ishment for them ; but that the doctrine of the motion of the earth .and the stability of the sun was only denounced to him as contrary to Scrip- ture, and as one which could not be defended or maintained. Cardinal Bellarmine drew up such a certificate in his own handwriting. GALILEO. 131 Ptolemy with much skill against the overwhelming arguments of the rival disputants. Galileo hoped to escape notice by this indirect mode of propagating the new system, and he obtained permission to pub- lish his work, which appeared at Florence in 1632. The Inquisition did not, as might have been ex- pected, immediately summon Galileo to their pres- 3nce. Nearly a year elapsed before they gave any ndication of their design; and, according to their own statement, they did not even take the subject under consideration till they saw that the obnoxious tenets were every day gaining ground, in conse- quence of the publication of the Dialogues. They then submitted the work to a careful examination, and having found it to be a direct violation of the njunction which had been formerly intimated to its author, they again cited him before their tribunal in 1633. The venerable sage, now in his seventieth year, was thus compelled to repair to Rome, and when he arrived he was committed to the apart- ments of the Fiscal of the Inquisition. The un- changeable friendship, however, of the Grand-duke of Tuscany obtained a remission of this severity, and Galileo was allowed to reside at the house of :he Tuscan ambassador during the two months which the trial occupied. When brought before ihe Inquisition, and examined upon oath, he ac- knowledged that the Dialogues were written by him- self, and that he obtained permission to publish them without notifying to the person who gave it that he lad been prohibited from holding, defending, or teaching the heretical opinions. He confessed also ihat the Dialogues were composed in such a manner, ihat the arguments in favour of the Copernican sys- tem, though given as partly false, were yet managed in such a manner that they were more likely to con- firm than overturn its doctrines ; but that this error, which was not intentional, arose from the natural desire of making an ingenious defence of false propo- 132 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. sitions, and of opinions that had the semblance of probability. After receiving these confessions and excuses, the Inquisition allowed Galileo a proper time for giving1 in his defence ; but this seems to have consisted solely in bringing forward the certificate of Cardinal Bellarmine already mentioned, which made no allu- sion to the promise under which Galileo had come never to defend, nor teach in any way whatever, the Copernican doctrines. The court held this defence to be an aggravation of the crime rather than an excuse for it, and proceeded to pronounce a sentence which will be ever memorable in the history of the human mind. Invoking the name of our Saviour, they declare, that Galileo had made himself liable to the suspicion of heresy, by believing the doctrine, contrary to Scripture, that the sun was the centre of the earth's orbit, and did not move from east to west ; and by defending as probable the opinion that the earth moved, and was not the centre of the world ; and that he had thus incurred all the censures and penal- ties which were enacted by the church against such offences ; — but that he should be absolved from these penalties, provided he sincerely abjured and cursed all the errors and heresies contained in the formula of the church, which should be submitted to him. That so grave and pernicious a crime should not pass altogether unpunished, that he might become more cautious in future, and might be an example to others to abstain from such offences, they decreed that his Dialogues should be prohibited by a formal edict, — that he should be condemned to the prison of the Inquisition during pleasure, — and that, during the three following years, he should recite once a week the seven penitential psalms. This sentence was subscribed by seven cardinals ; and on the 22d June, 1633, Galileo signed an abjura- tion humiliating to himself and degrading to philoso- GALILEO. 133 134 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. January, 1615, he defends the Copernican system with much boldness and ingenuity; he reconciles the various passages of Scripture with the new doc- trine, and he expresses the hope that such an attempt, now made for the first time, will prove agreeable to philosophers, but particularly to those very learned men, Galileo Galilei, John Kepler, and all the mem- bers of the Lyncean Academy, who, he believes, entertain the same opinion. This remarkable pro- duction, written from the convent of the Carmelites at Naples, is dedicated to the very Reverend Sebas- tian Fantoni, general of the order of Carmelites, and was published at Florence, with the sanction of the ecclesiastical authorities, in 1630 ; three years before the second persecution of Galileo. It would be interesting to know the state of public feeling in Italy when Galileo was doomed to the prisons of the Inquisition. No appeal seems to have been made against so cruel a sentence ; and neither in remonstrance nor in derision does an individual voice seem to have been raised. The master spirits of the age looked with sullen indifference on the persecution of exalted genius ; and Galileo lay in chains, deserted and unpitied. This unrebuked tri- umph of his enemies was perhaps favourable to the object of their vengeance. Resistance might have heightened the rigour of a sentence, which submis- sion seems to have alleviated. The interference of some eminent individuals of Rome, among whom we have no doubt that the Grand-duke of Tuscany was the most influential, induced Pope Urban VIII., not only to shorten the period, but to soften the rigour of Galileo's imprisonment. From the dun- geon of the Inquisition, where he had remained only foui days, he was transported to the ambassador's palace in the Garden de Medici at Rome ; and when his health had begun to suifer, he was permitted to leave the metropolis ; and would have been allowed to return to Florence, but as the plague raged in GALILEO. 135 that city, he was sent, in July, 1633, to the archi- episcopal palace of Sienna, the residence of the Arch- bishop Piccolimini, where he carried on and com- pleted his valuable investigations respecting the resistance of solids. Here he continued five months, when, in consequence of the disappearance of the plague at Florence, he was allowed to retire to his villa at Bellosguardo, and afterward to that of Ar- cetri in the vicinity of Florence. Though Galileo was now, to a certain degree, liberated from the power of man, yet the afflicting dispensations of Providence began to fall thickly around him. No sooner had he returned to Arcetri, than his favourite daughter, Maria, was seized with a dangerous illness, which soon terminated in her death. He was himself attacked with hernia, pal- pitation of the heart, loss of appetite, and the most oppressive melancholy; and though he solicited permission to repair to Florence for medical assist- ance, yet this deed of mercy was denied him. In 1638, however, the pope permitted him to pay a visit to Florence, and his friend, Father Castelli, was allowed to visit him in the company of an officer of the Inquisition. But this indulgence was soon with- drawn, and at the end of a few months he was re- manded to Arcetri. The sight of his right eye had begun to fail in 1636, from an opacity of the cornea. In 1637 his left eye was attacked with the same complaint ; so that in a few months he was affected with total and incurable blindness. Before this ca- lamity had supervened, he had noticed the curious phenomenon of the moon's libration, in consequence of which, parts of her visible disk that are exposed to view at one time are withdrawn at another. He succeeded in explaining two of the causes of this curious phenomenon, viz. the different distances of the observer from the line joining the centre of .the earth and the moon, which produces the diurnal libration, and the unequal motion of the moon in her 136 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. orbit, which produces the libration in longitude. It was left, however, to Hevelius to discover the libra- tion in latitude, which arises from the inclination of her axis being a little less than a right angle to the ecliptic ; and to Lagrange to discover the spheroidal libration, or that which arises from the action of the earth upon the lunar spheroid. The sorrows with which Galileo was now beset, seemed to have disarmed the severity of the Inqui- sition. He was freely permitted to enjoy the society of his friends, who now thronged around him to express their respect and their sympathy. The Grand-duke of Tuscany was his frequent visiter, and Gassendi, Deodati, and our countryman Milton went to Italy for the purpose of visiting him. He entertained his friends with the warmest hospitality, and though simple and abstemious in his diet, yet he was fond of good wine, and* seems even in his last days to have paid particular attention to the excel- lence of his cellar. Although Galileo had nearly lost his hearing as well as his sight, yet his intellectual faculties were unimpaired; and while his mind was occupied in considering the force of percussion, he was seized with fever and palpitation of the heart, which, after two months' illness, terminated his life on the 8th of January, 1642. Among the predecessors of Newton in astro- nomical research we must not omit the names of Bouillaud (Bullialdus), Borelli, and Dr. Hooke. Ismael Bouillaud, a native of Laon in France, and the author of several valuable astronomical works, has derived more reputation from a single -sentence in his Astronomica Philolaica, published in 1645, than from all the rest of his labours. He was not a be- liever in the doctrine of attraction, which, as we have already seen, had been broached by Copernicus, and discovered by Kepler ; but in speaking of that power as the cause of the planetary motions, he BORELLI HOOKE. 137 remarks, "that if attraction existed, it would de- crease as the square of the distance." The influ- ence of gravity was still more distinctly developed by Borelli, a Neapolitan philosopher, who published h 1666 a work on Jupiter's satellites.* In this work he maintains, that all the planets perform their mo- tions round the sun according- to a general law ; that the satellites of Jupiter and of Saturn move round their primary planets in the same manner as the moon does round the earth, and that they all re- volve round the sun, which is the only source of any virtue, and that this virtue attaches them, and unites them so that they cannot recede from their centre of action, f Our countryman Dr. Robert Hooke seems to have devoted much of his attention to the cause of the planetary motions. On the 21st March, 1666, he read to the Royal Society an account of a series of experiments for determining if bodies experience any variation in their weight at different distances from the centre of the earth. His experiments, as Hooke himself saw, were by no means satisfactory, and hence he was led to the ingenious idea of measuring the force of gravity by observing, at dif- ferent altitudes, the rate of a pendulum clock. About two months afterward, he exhibited to the Society an approximate representation of the forces which retain the planets in their orbits, in the paths described by a circular pendulum impelled with dif- * TheorictB Medicearum planetarum ex causis physicis deducts Flor 1666, 4to. t M. Delambre maintains that these views of Borelli are only those of Kepler slightly modified. Newton and Huygens have attached to them a greater value. The last of these philosophers remarks, " Refert Plu- tarchus, fuisse jam olim qui putaret ideo manere lunam in orbe suo, quod vis recedendi a terra, ob motum circularem, inhiberetur pan vi gravi- tatis, qua ad terram accedere conaretur. Idemque aevo nostro, non de lunatantum sed et planetis ceteris statuit Alphonsus Borellus, utnempe primariis eorum gravitas esset solem versus ; lunis vero ad terram, Jovemac Saturnum quos comitantiir."— Huygen, Cosmotheor, lib »».; Opera, t. ii. p. 720. M2 138 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. ferent degrees of force ; but though this experiment illustrated the production of a curvilineal motion, by combining a tangential force with a central power of attraction, yet it was only an illustration, and could not lead to the true cause of the planetary mo- tions. At a later period, however, viz. in 1674, Hooke resumed the subject in a dissertation entitled " An Attempt to prove the Motion of the Earth from Observation," which contains the following remark- able observations upon gravity: — " I shall hereafter explain a system of the world differing in many particulars from any yet known, answering in all things to the common rules of me- chanical motions. This depends upon three suppo- sitions:— first, that all celestial bodies whatsoever have an attraction or gravitating power towards their own centres, whereby they attract, not only their own parts, and keep them from flying from them, as we may observe the earth to do, but that they also do attract all the other celestial bodies that are within the sphere of their activity, and con- sequently, that not only the sun and moon have an influence upon the body and motion of the earth, and the earth upon them, but that Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, also, by their attractive powers, have a considerable influence upon its mo- tion, as in the same manner the corresponding at- tractive power of the earth hath a considerable in- fluence upon every one of their motions also. The second supposition is this, that all bodies what- soever that are put into a direct and simple motion will so continue to move forward in a straight line, till they are, by some other effectual powers, de- flected, and sent into a motion describing a circle, ellipsis, or some other more compounded curve line. The third supposition is, that those attractive pow- eis are so much the more powerful in operating by how much the nearer the body wrought upon is to their own centres. Now9 what these several degrees are 1 LAW OF GRAVITY. 130 have not yet 'experimentally verified ; but it is a notion which, if ftey prosecute^ as it ought to be, will mightily assist the astronomers to reduce all the celestial motions to a certain rule, which I doubt will never be done without it. He that understands the nature of the circular pendulum and circular motion will easily understand the whole of this principle, and will know where to find directions in nature for the true stating thereof. This I only hint at present to such as have ability and opportu- nity of prosecuting this inquiry, and are not wanting of industry for observing and calculating, wishing heartily such may be found, having myself many other things in hand, which I would first complete, and therefore cannot so well attend it. But this I do not promise the undertaker, that he will find all the great motions of the world to be influenced by this principle, and that the true understanding thereof will be the true perfection of astronomy." This passage, which has been considered as a re- markable one by the philosophers of every country, has, we think, been misapprehended by M. Delam- bre, when he asserts that every thing which it con- tains " is to be found expressly in Kepler."* * Hist, de VA&tronomie aux Dioc-huitieme Sttcle, p. 9. 140 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. CHAPTER XL The first Idea of Gravity occurs to Newton in 1666 — His first Specu- lations upon it—Interrupted by his Optical Experiments— He re- sumes the Subject in consequence of a Discussion with Dr. Heoke — He. discovers the true Law of Gravity and the Cause oftfie Planetary Motions — Dr. Halley urges him to publish his Principia — His Prin- ciples of Natural Philosophy— Proceedings of the Royal Society on this Subject — The Principia appears in 16S7 — General Account of it, and of the Discoveries it contains — They meet with great Opposition, owing to the Prevalence of the Cartesian System — Account of the Re- ception and Progress of the Newtonian Philosophy in foreign Coun- tries— Account of its Progress and Establishment in England. SUCH is a brief sketch of the labours and lives of those illustrious men who prepared the science of astronomy for the application of Newton's genius. Copernicus had determined the arrangement and general movements of the planetary bodies : Kepler had proved that they moved in elliptical orbits ; that their radii vectores described arcs proportional to the times; and that their periodic times wer related to their distances. Galileo had added to the universe a whole system of secondary planets ; and several astronomers had distinctly referred the mo- tion of the heavenly bodies to the power of attraction. In the year 1666, when the plague had driven Newton from Cambridge, he was sitting alone in the garden at Woolsthorpe, and reflecting on the nature of gravity, — that remarkable power which causes all bodies to descend 'towards the centre of the earth. As this power is not found to suffer any sensible diminution at the greatest distance from the earth's centre to which we can reach, being as powerful at the tops of the highest mountains as at the bottom of the deepest mines, he conceived it highly probable, that it must extend much farther than was usually supposed. No sooner had this NEWTON'S IDEA OF GRAVITY. lit conjecture occurred to his mind, than he con- le'red what would be the effect of its extending as far as the moon. That her motion must be influ- enced by such a power he did not for a moment doubt ; and a little reflection convinced him that it might be sufficient for retaining that luminary in her orbit round the earth. Though the force of gravity suffers no sensible diminution at those small dis- tances from the earth's centre at which we can place ourselves, yet he thought it very possible, that, at the distance of the moon, it might, differ much in strength from what it is on the earth. In order to form some estimate of the degree of its diminution, he considered that, if the moon be re- tained in her orbit by the force of gravity, the pri- mary planets must also be carried round the sun by the same power ; and by comparing the periods of the different planets with their distances from the sun, he found, that if they were retained in their orbits by any power like gravity, its force must de- crease in the duplicate proportion,* or as the squares of their distances from the sun. In drawing this conclusion, he supposed the planets to move in or- bits perfectly circular, and having the sun in their centre. Having thus obtained the law of the force by which the planets were drawn to the sun, his next object was to ascertain if such a force, ema- nating from the earth and directed to the moon, was sufficient, when diminished in the duplicate ratio of the distance, to retain her in her orbit. In perform- ing this calculation, it was necessary to compare the space through which heavy bodies fall in a second at a given distance from the centre of the earth, viz. at its surface, with the space through which the moon, as it were, falls to the earth in a second of time while revolving in a circular orbit. Being at * " But for the duplicate proportion, I gathered it from Kepler's theo- rem about twenty years ago."— Newton's Letter to Halley, July 14, 1686. 142 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. a distance from books when he made this compu- tation, he adopted the common estimate of the earth's diameter then in use among geographers and navi- gators, and supposed that each degree of latitude contained sixty English miles. In this way he found that the force which retains the moon in her orbit, as deduced from the force which occasions the fall of heavy bodies to the earth's surface, was one- sixth greater than that which is actually observed in her circular orbit. This difference threw a doubt upon all his speculations ; but, unwilling to abandon what seemed to be otherwise so plausible, he endeav- oured to account for the difference of the two forces, by supposing that some other cause* must have been united with the force of gravity in producing so great a velocity of the moon in her circular orbit. As this new cause, however, was beyond the reach of observation, he discontinued all further inquiries into the subject, and concealed from his friends the speculations in which he had been employed. ^ After his return to Cambridge in 1666, his atten- tion was occupied with those optical discoveries of which we have given an account in a preceding chapter ; but he had no sooner brought them to a close than his mind reverted to the great subject of the planetary motions. Upon the death of Olden- burg in August, 1678, Dr. Hooke was appointed secretary to the Royal Society ; and as this learned body had requested the opinion of Newton about a system of physical astronomy, he addressed a letter to Dr. Hooke on the 28th November, 1679. In this letter he proposed a direct experiment for verifying the motion of the earth, viz. by observing whether or not bodies that fall from a considerable height descend in a vertical direction, for if the earth were at rest the body would describe exactly a vertical * Whiston asserts that this cause was supposed by Newton to be something analogous to the vortices of Descartes.— See Whiston's Me- moirs of himself, p. 231. LAW OF GRAVITY. 143 line, whereas if it revolved round its axis, the falling body must deviate from the vertical line towards the east. The Royal Society attached great value to * the idea thus casually suggested, and Dr. Hooke was appointed to put it to the test of experiment. Being thus led to consider the subject more attentively, he wrote to Newton, that wherever the direction of gravity was oblique to the axis on which the earth revolved, that is, in every part of the earth ex- cept the equator, falling bodies should approach to the equator, and the deviation from the ver- tical, in place of being exactly to the east, as Newton maintained, should be to the south-east of ~ the point from which the body began to move. Newton acknowledged that this conclusion was cor- rect in theory, and Dr. Hooke is said to have given an experimental demonstration of it before the Royal Society in December, 1679.* Newton had errone-^" ously concluded that the path of the falling body would be a spiral; but Dr. Hooke, on the same occasion on which he made the preceding experi- ment, read a paper to the Society, in which he proved that the path of the body would be an eccentric ellipse in vacuo, and an ellipti-spiral, if the body moved in a resisting medium-! This correction of Newton's error, and the dis- covery that a projectile would move in an elliptical orbit when under the influence of a force varying in the inverse ratio of the square of the distance, led Newton, as he himself informs us in his letter to Halley,J to discover " the theorem by which he af- terward examined the ellipsis," and to demonstrate the celebrated proposition, that a planet acted upon by an attractive force varying inversely as the squares of the distances will describe an elliptical orbit, in one of whose foci the attractive force re- sides. * Waller's Life of Hooke, p. 22. J July 27, 1686, Biog. Brit. p. 2662. 144 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. But though Newton had thus discovered the true cause of all the celestial motions, he did not yet possess any evidence that such a force actually re- sided in the sun and planets. The failure of his former attempt to identify the law of falling bodies at the earth's surface with that which guided the moon in her orbit threw a doubt over all his specu- lations, and prevented him from giving any account of them to the public. * An accident, however, of a very interesting nature induced him to resume his former inquiries, and enabled him to bring them to a close. In June, 1682, when he was attending a meeting of the Royal Society of London, the measurement of a degree of the meridian, executed by M. Picardin 1679, became the subject of conversation. Newton took a memo- randum of the result obtained by the French astron- omer, and having deduced from it the diameter of the earth, he immediately resumed his calculation of 1665, and began to repeat it with these new data. In the progress of the calculation he saw that the result which he had formerly expected was likely to be produced, and he was thrown into such a state of nervous irritability that he was unable to carry on the calculation. In this state of mind he intrusted it to one of his friends, and he had the high satis- faction of finding his former views amply realized. The force of gravity which regulated the fall of bodies at the earth's surface, when diminished as the square of the moon's distance from the earth, was found to be almost exactly equal to the centri- L, fugal force of the moon as deduced from her observed distance and velocity. The influence of such a result upon such a mind maybe more easily conceived than described. The whole material universe was spread out before him ; — the sun with all his attending planets ; — the planets with all their satellites; — the comets wheeling in every direction in their eccentric orbits ; — and the PLANETARY MOTIONS. 145 systems of the fixed stars stretching to the remotest limits of space. All the varied and complicated movements of the heavens, in short, must have been at once presented to his mind, as the necessary result of that law which he had established in reference to the earth and the moon. After extending this law to the other bodies of ;he system, he composed a series of propositions on the motion of the primary planets about the siin^ which were sent to London about the end of 1683, and were soon afterward communicated to tfre [loj'al Society.* About this period other philosophers had been occupied with the same subject. Sir Christopher Wren had many years before endeavoured to ex- plain the planetary motions "by the composition of a descent towards the sun, and an impressed motion ; but he at length gave it over, not finding he means of doing it." In January, 1683-4, Dr. Galley had concluded, from Kepler's Law of the Periods and Distances, that the centripetal force de- Teased in the reciprocal proportion of the squares of the distances, and having one day met Sir Chris- ;opher Wren and Dr. Hooke, the latter affirmed ,hat he had demonstrated upon that principle all ;he laws of the celestial motions. Dr. Halley con- ressed that his attempts were unsuccessful, and Sir Christopher, in order to encourage the inquiry, offered to present a book of forty shillings' value to either of the two philosophers who should, in the space of two months, bring him a convincing de- monstration of it. Hooke persisted in the decla- * ration that he possessed the method, but avowed it to be his intention to conceal it for some time. He promised, however, to show it to Sir Christopher ; but there is every reason to believe that this prom- ise was never fulfilled. In August, 1684,, Dr. Halley went to Cambridge * Commercium Epistolicumt No. 7 '146 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. for the express purpose of consulting Newton on this interesting subject. Newton assured him that he had brought this demonstration to perfection, and promised him a copy of it. This copy was re- ceived in November by the doctor, who made a second visit to Cambridge, in order to induce its author to have it inserted in the register book of the society. On the 10th of December, Dr. Halley announced to the society, that he had seen at Cam- bridge Mr. Newton's treatise De Motu Corporum, which he had promised to send to the society to be entered upon their register ; and Dr. Halley was de- sired to unite with Mr. Paget, master of the mathe- matical school in Christ's Hospital, in reminding Mr. Newton of his promise " for securing the inven- tion to himself till such time as he can be at leisure to publish it." On the 25th February Mr. Aston, the secretary, communicated a letter from Mr. Newton, in which he expressed his willingness " to enter in the register his notions about motion, and his intentions to fit them suddenly for the press." The progress of his work was, however, interrupted by a visit of five or six weeks which he made in Lincolnshire ; but he proceeded with such diligence on his return, that he was able to transmit the manu- script to London before the end of April. This manuscript, entitled Philosophic Naturalis Principia Mathematica^ and dedicated to the society, was pre- sented by Dr. Vincent on the 28th April, 1686, when Sir John Hoskins, the vice-president, and the par- ticular friend of Dr. Hooke, was in the chair. Dr. Vincent passed a just encomium on the novelty and dignity of the subject ; and another member added, that " Mr. Newton had carried the thing so far, that there was no more to be added." To these remarks the vice-president replied, that the method " was so much the more to be prized as it was both invented and perfected at the same time." Dr. Hooke took offence at these remarks, and blamed Sir John for PRINCIPIA. 147 ipt having mentioned " what he had discovered to lim ;" but the vice-president did not seem to recol- ect any such communication, and the consequence )f this discussion was, that " these two, who till hen were the most inseparable cronies, have since scarcely seen one another, and are utterly fallen >ut." After the breaking up of the meeting, the ociety adjourned to the coffee-house, where Dr. Hooke stated that he not only had made the same iiscovery, but had given the first hint of it to Newton. An account of these proceedings was communi- ated to Newton through two different channels, n a letter dated May 22d, Dr. Halley wrote to him that Mr. Hooke has some pretensions upon the nvention of the rule of the decrease of gravity be- ig reciprocally as the squares of the distances from le centre. He says you had the notion from him, lough he owns the demonstration of the curves enerated thereby to be wholly your own. How nuch of this is so you know best, as likewise what ou have to do in this matter. Only Mr. Hooke eems to expect you would make some mention of im in the preface, which it is possible you may ee reason to prefix." 'This communication from Dr. Halley induced ur author, on the 20th June, to address a long itter to him, in which he gives a minute and able Mutation of Hooke's claims ; but before this letter as despatched, another correspondent, who had eceived his information from one of the members lat were present, informed Newton " that Hooke nade a great stir, pretending that he had all from im, and desiring they would see that he had justice one him." This fresh charge seems to have ruf- ed the tranquillity of Newton ; and he accordingly idded an angry and satirical postscript, in which he treats Hooke with little ceremony, and goes so far as to conjecture that Hooke might have acquired his knowledge of the law from a letter of his own 148 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. to Huygens, directed to Oldenburg, and dated Janu- ary 14th, 1672-3. "My letter to Hugenius was directed to Mr. Oldenburg, who used to keep the originals. His papers came into Mr. Hooke's pos- session. Mr. Hooke, knowing my hand, might have the curiosity to look into that letter, and there take the notion of comparing the forces of the planets arising from their circular motion ; and so what he wrote to me afterward about the rate of gravity might be nothing but the fruit of my own garden." In replying to this letter, Dr. Halley assured him that Hooke's "manner of claiming the discovery had been represented to him in worse colours than it ought, and that he neither made public application to the society for justice, nor pretended that you had all from him." The effect of this assurance was to make Newton regret that he had written the angry postscript to his letter; and in replying to Halley on the 14th July, 1686, he not only expresses his regret, but recounts the different new ideas which he had acquired from Hooke's correspon- dence, and suggests it as the best method " of com- promising the present dispute," to add a scholium, in which Wren, Hooke, and Halley are acknowledged to have independently deduced the law of gravity from the second law of Kepler.* At the meeting of the 28th April, at which the manuscript of the Principia was presented to the Royal Society, it was agreed that the printing of it should be referred to the council ; that a letter of thanks should be written to its author; and at a meeting of the council on the 19th May, it was resolved that the MSS. should be printed at the society's expense, and that Dr. Halley should super- intend it while going through the press. These resolutions were communicated by Dr. Halley in a letter dated the 22d May ; and in Newton's replv on the 20th June already mentioned, he makes the fol • * This Scholium is added to Prop. iv. lib. i. coroll 6. PRINCIPIA. 149 towing observations : " The proof you sent me I like very well. I designed the whole to consist of three books ; the second was finished last summer, being short, and only wants transcribing, and draw- I trig the cuts fairly. Some new propositions I have bince thought on, which I can as well let alone. [The third wants the theory of comets. In autumn | last I spent two months in calculation to no purpose I for want of a good method, which made me after- [ward return to the first book, and enlarge it with [diverse propositions, some relating to comets, others | to other things found out last winter. The third I (now design to suppress. Philosophy is such an im- pertinently litigious lady, that a man had as good be I engaged in lawsuits as have to do with her. I found it so formerly, and now I can no sooner come near her again but she gives me warning. The first two books without the third will not so well bear the title of Philosophise, Naturalis Principia Mathe- \matica ; and therefore I had altered it to this, De \ Motu Corporum Libri duo. But after second thoughts il retain the former title. It will help the sale of the ! book, which I ought not to diminish now 'tis yours." In replying to this letter on the 29th June, Dr. Halley regrets that our author's tranquillity should have been thus disturbed by envious rivals; and implores him in the name of the society not to suppress the third book. " I must again beg you," says he, " not to let your resentments run so high as to deprive us of your third book, wherein your applications of your mathematical doctrine to the theory of comets, and several curious experiments, which, as I guess by what you write ought to com- pose it, will undoubtedly render it acceptable to those who will call themselves philosophers without mathematics, which are much the greater number.'* To these solicitations Newton seems to have readily yielded. His second book was sent to the society, and presented on the 2d March, 1686-7. 150 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. The third book was also transmitted, and presented on the 6th April, and the whole work was completed and published in the month of May, 1687. Such is a brief account of the publication of a work which is memorable, not only in the annals ofj one science or of one country, but which will form an epoch in the history of the world, and will ever be regarded as the brightest page in the records of human reason. We shall endeavour to convey to the reader some idea of its contents, and of the bril- liant discoveries which it disseminated over Europe. The Principia consists of three books. The first and second, which occupy three-fourths of the work, are entitled, On the Motion of Bodies ; and the third bears the title, On the System of the World. The first two books contain the mathematical principles of philosophy, namely, the laws and conditions of motions and forces ; and they are illustrated with several philosophical scholia, which treat of some ofj the most general and' best established points in phi- losophy, such as the density and resistance of bodies, spaces void of matter, and the motion of sound and light. The object of the third book is to deduce from these principles the constitution of the system of the world ; and this book has been drawn up in as popular a style as possible, in order that it may be generally read. The great discovery which characterizes the Principia is that of the principle of universal gravi- tation, as deduced from the motion of the moon, and from the threegreat facts or laws discovered Jby ^Ke_pler. This principle is, that every~~pdriicle of matter is attracted by, or gravitates to, every other particle of matter, with a force inversely proportional to the squares of their distances. From the first law of Kepler, namely, the proportionality of the areas to the times of their description, Newton inferred that the force which kept the planet in its orbit was always directed to the sun; and from the second UNIVERSAL GRAVITATION. l£l law of Kepler, that every planet moves in an ellipse i with the sun in one of its foci, he drew the still more general inference, that the force by which the planet Inoves round that focus varies inversely as the [square of its distance from the focus. As this law :was true in the motion of satellites round their pri- mary planets, Newton deduced the equality of gravity in all the heavenly bodies towards the sun, upon the supposition that they are equally distant from its centre ; and in the case of terrestrial bodies, he sue needed in verifying this truth by numerous and accu rate experiments. By taking a more general view of the subject Newton demonstrated that a conic section was the only curve in which a body could move when acted upon by a force varying inversely as the square of he distance ; and he established the conditions de- pending on the velocity and the primitive position of the body, which were requisite to make it de- scribe a circular, an elliptical, a parabolic, or a lyperbolic orbit. Notwithstanding the generality and importance of these results, it still remained to be determined whether the force resided in the centres of the )lanets, or belonged to each individual particle of which they were composed. Newton removed this incertainty by demonstrating, that if a spherical >ody acts upon a distant body with a force varying as the distance of this body from the centre of the phere, the same effect will be produced as if each >f its particles acted upon the distant body accord- ing to the same law. And hence it follows that the spheres, whether they are of uniform density, or consist of concentric layers, with densities varying according to any law whatever, will act upon each other in the same manner as if their force resided in their centres alone. But as the bodies of the solar system are very nearly spherical, they will all act upon one another, and upon bodies placed oa 152 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. their surface, as if they were so many centres of attraction ; and therefore we obtain the law of gravity which subsists between spherical bodies, namely, that one sphere will act upon another with a force directly proportional to the quantity of matter, and inversely as the square of the distance between the centres of the spheres. From the equality of action and reaction, to which no exception can be found, Newton concluded that the sun gravitated to the planets, and the planets to their satellites ; and the earth itself to the stone which falls upon its surface; and, consequently, that the two mutually gravitating bodies approached to one another with velocities inversely proportional to their quantities of matter. Having established this universal law, Newton was enabled, not only to determine the weight which the same body would have at the surface of the sun and the planets, but even to calculate the quantity of matter in the sun, and in all the planets that had satellites, and even to determine the density or specific gravity of the matter of which they were composed. In this way he found that the weight of the same body would be twenty-three times greater at the surface of the sun than at the aurface of the earth, and that the density of the earth was four times greater than that of the sun, the planets increasing in density as they receded from the centre of the system. If the peculiar genius of Newton has been dis- played in his investigation of the law of universal gravitation, it shines with no less lustre in the pa- tience and sagacity with which he traced the conse- quences of this fertile principle. The discovery of the spheroidal form of Jupiter by Cassini had probably directed the attention of Newton to the determination of its cause, and con sequently to the investigation of the true figure of the earth. The spherical form of the planets have been ascribed by Copernicus to the gravity or natural FIGURE OF THE EARTH. 153 itency of their parts; but upon considering the ;h as a body revolving upon its axis, Newton quickly saw that the figure arising from the mutual attraction of its parts must be modified by another force arising from its rotation. When a body re- volves upon an axis, the velocity of rotation in- creases from the poles, where it is nothing, to the equator, where it is a maximum. In consequence of this velocity the bodies on the earth's surface [lave a tendency to fly off from it, and this tendency increases with the velocity. Hence arises a centrifu- gal force which acts in combination with a force of gravity, and which Newton found to be the 289th part of the force of gravity at the equator, and de- creasing, as the cosine of the latitude, from the equator to the poles. The great predominance of gravity over the centrifugal force prevents the latter irom carrying off any bodies from the earth's sur- face, but the weight of all bodies is diminished by ;he centrifugal force, so that the weight of any body is greater at the poles than it is at the equator. If we now suppose the waters at the pole to commu- nicate with those at the equator by means of a ca- nal, one branch of which goes from the pole to the centre of the earth, and the other from the centre of the earth to the equator, then the polar branch of the canal will be heavier than the equatorial branch, in consequence of its weight not being di- minished by the centrifugal force, and, therefore, in order that the two columns maybe in equilibrio, the equatorial one must be lengthened. Newton found that the length of the polar must be to that of the equatorial canal as 229 to 230, or that the earth's polar radius must be seventeen miles less than its equa- jtorial radius ; that is, that the figure of the earth is an oblate spheroid, formed by the revolution of an ellipse round its lesser axis. Hence it follows, that the intensity of gravity at any point of the earth's surface is in the inverse ratio of the distance of that , 154 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. point from the centre, and, consequently, that it di- minishes from the equator to the poles, — a result which he confirmed by the fact, that clocks required to have their pendulums shortened in order to beat true time when carried from Europe towards the equator. The next subject to which Newton applied the principle of gravity was the tides of the ocean. The philosophers of all ages have recognised the connexion between the phenomena of the tides and the position of the moon. The College of Jesuits at Coimbra, and subsequently Antonio de Dominis and Kepler, distinctly referred the tides to the attrac- tion of the waters of the earth by the moon, but so imperfect was the explanation which was thus given of the phenomena, that Galileo ridiculed the idea of lunar attraction, and substituted for it a fallacious explanation of his own. That the moon is the principal cause of the tides is obvious from the well- known fact, that it is high water at any given place about the time when she is in the meridian of that place ; and that the sun performs a secondary part in their production may be proved from the circum- stance, that the highest tides take place when the sun, the moon, and the earth are in the same straight line, that is, when the force of the sun conspires with that of the moon, and that the lowest tides take place when the lines drawn from the sun and moon to the earth are at right angles to each other, that is, when the force of the sun acts in opposition to that of the moon. The most perplexing phe- nomenon in the tides of the ocean, and one which is still a stumbling-block to persons slightly acquainted with the theory of attraction, is the existence of high water on the side of the earth opposite to the moon, as well as on the side next the moon. To maintain that the attraction of the moon at the same instant draws the waters of the ocean towards her- self, and also draws them from the earth in an oppo- TIDES. 155 •ite direction, seems at first sight paradoxical ; but he difficulty vanishes when we consider the earth, r rather the centre of the earth, and the water on ach side of it as three distinct bodies placed at dif- erent distances from the moon, and consequently ttr acted with forces inversely proportional to the quaies of their distances. The water nearest the noon will be much more powerfully attracted than he centre of the earth, and the centre of the earth nore powerfully than the water farthest from the noon. The consequence of this must be, that the raters nearest the moon will be drawn away from he centre of the earth, and will consequently rise •om their level, while the centre of the earth will e drawn away from the waters opposite the moon, vhich will, as it were, be left behind, and conse- uently be in the same situation as if they were aised from the earth in a direction opposite to lat in which they are attracted by the moon, "ence the effect of the moon's action upon the arth is to draw its fluid parts into the form of an )long spheroid, the axis of which passes through le moon. As the action of the sun will produce le very same effect, though in a smaller degree, le tide at any place will depend on the relative po- tion of these two spheroids, and will be always qual either to the sum or to the difference of the ffects of the two luminaries. At the time of new nd full moon the two spheroids will have their axes oincident, and the height of the tide, which will len be a spring one, will be equal to the sum of the evations produced in each spheroid considered Bparately, while at the first and third quarters the tes of the spheroids will be at right angles to each ;her, and the height of the tide, which will tlien be ja neap one, will be equal to the difference of the elevations produced in each separate spheroid. By comparing the spring and neap tides, Newton found that the force with which the sun acted upon the 156 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. waters of the earth was to that with which the sun ; acted upon them as 4.48 to 1 ; — that the force of the | moon produced a tide of 8.63 feet ; — that of the suni one of 1.93 feet; — and both of them combined, one of 1(H French feet, — a result which in the open sea does not deviate much from observation. Having thus ascertained the force of the moon on the waters of our globe, he found that the quantity of mattei in the moon was to that in the earth as 1 to 40, and the density of the moon to that of the earth as 11 to 9. The motions of the moon, so much within the reach of our own observation, presented a fine field for the application of the theory of universal gravi- tation. The irregularities exhibited in the lunai motions had been known in the time of Hipparchus and Ptolemy. Tycho had discovered the great in- equality called the variation, amounting to 37', and depending on the alternate acceleration and retard- ation of the moon in every quarter of a revolution, and he had also ascertained the existence of the annual equation. Of these two inequalities Newton gave a most satisfactory explanation. The action of the sun upon the moon may be always resolved into two, one acting in the direction of the line join- ing the moon and earth, and consequently tending to increase or diminish the moon's gravity to the earth, and the other in a direction at right angles to this, and consequently tending to accelerate or re- tard the motion in her orbit. Now, it was found by Newton that this last force was reduced to nothing, or vanished at the syzigies or quadratures, so that at these four points the moon described areas pro- portional to the times. The instant, however, that the moon quits these positions, the force under con* sideration, which we may call the tangential force, begins, and it reaches its maximum in the four oc- tants. The force, therefore, compounded of these two elements of the solar force, or the diagonal of LUNAR THEORY. 157 i the parallelogram which they form, is no longer directed to the earth's centre, but deviates from it at a maximum about 30 minutes, and therefore affects the angular motion of the moon, the motion being accelerated in passing from the quadratures to the syzigies, and retarded in passing from the syzigies to the quadratures. Hence the velocity is in its mean state in the cctanls, a maximum in the syzi- gies, and a minimum in the quadratures. Upon considering the influence of the solar force in diminishing or increasing the moon's gravity to the earth, Newton saw that her distance and her periodic time must from this cause be subject to change, and in this way he accounted for the annual equation observed by Tycho. By the application of similar principles, he explained the cause of the motion of the apsides, or of the greater axis of the moon's orbit, which has an angular progressive mo- tion of 3° 4' nearly in the course of one lunation ; and he showed that the retrogradation of the nodes, amounting to 3' 10" daily, arose from one of the ele- ments of the solar force being exerted in the plane of the ecliptic, and not in the plane of the moon's orbit, the effect of which was to draw the moon down to the plane of the ecliptic, and thus cause the [me of the nodes, or the intersection of these two planes, to move in a direction opposite to that of the moon. The lunar theory thus blocked out by New- ton, required for its completion the labours of another century. The imperfections of the fluxionary cal- culus prevented him from explaining the other ine- qualities of the moon's motions, and it was reserved to Euler, D'Alembert, Clairaut, Mayer, and Laplace to bring the lunar tables to a high degree of perfec- tion, and to enable the navigator to determine his longitude at sea with a degree of precision which the most sanguine astronomer could scarcely have anticipated. By the consideration of the retrograde motion of O 158 SIR ISAAC NEWTOff. the moon's nodes, Newton was led to discover the cause of the remarkable phenomenon of the preces- sion of the equinoctial points, which moved 50" an- nually, and completed the circuit of the heavens in 25,920 years. Kepler had declared himself incapa- ble of assigning- any cause for this motion, and we do not believe that any other astronomer ever made the attempt. From the spheroidal form of the earth, it may be regarded as a sphere with a spheroidal ring surrounding its equator, one-half of the ring beii^ "ibove the plane of the ecliptic and the other half below it. Considering this excess of matter as a system of satellites adhering to the earth's sur- face, Newton saw that the combined actions of the sun and moon upon these satellites tended to pro- duce a retrogradation in the nodes of the circles which they described in their diurnal rotation, and that the sum of all the tendencies being communi- cated to the whole mass of the planet, ought to pro- duce a slow retrogradation of the equinoctial points. The effect produced by the motion of the sun he found to be 40", and that produced by the action of , the moon 10". Although there could be little doubt that the comets were retained in their orbits by the same laws which regulated the motions of the planets, yet it was difficult to put this opinion to the test of observation. The visibility of comets only in a small part of their orbits rendered it difficult to as- , certain their distance and periodic times, and as theii •• periods were probably of great length, it was impos- \ sible to correct approximate results by repeated ob- servation. Newton, however, removed this diffi- j culty, by showing how to determine the orbit of 2 i comet, namely, the form and position of the orbil i and the periodic time, by three observations. By [ applying this method to the comet of 1680, he cal- culated the elements of its orbit, and from the agree- ment of the comouted places with those which COMETS. 159 vere observed, he justly inferred that the motions )f comets were regulated by the same laws as those >f the planetary bodies. This result was one of preat importance ; for as the comets enter our sys- em in every possible direction, and at all angles vith the ecliptic, and as a great part of their orbits xtend far beyond the limits of the solar system, it emonstrated the existence of gravity in spaces far removed beyond the planet, and proved that the law )f the inverse ratio of the squares of the distance Fas true in every possible direction, and at very re- note distances from the centre of our system.* Such is a brief view of the leading discoveries rhich the Principia first announced to the world. The grandeur of the subjects of which it treats, the eautiful simplicity of the system which it unfolds, he clear and concise reasoning by which that sys- ,em is explained, and the irresistible evidence by ivhich it is supported might have ensured it the warmest admiration of contemporary mathemati- ians, and the most welcome reception in all the chools of philosophy throughout Europe. This, lowever, is not the way in which great truths are generally received. Though the astronomical dis- overies of Newton were not assailed by the class >f ignorant pretenders who attacked his optical writings, yet they were every where resisted by the rrors and prejudices which had taken a deep hold ven of the strongest minds. The philosophy of Descartes was predominant throughout Europe. Appealing to the imagination, and not to the reason f mankind, it was quickly received into popular avour, and the same causes which facilitated its in- roduction extended its influence, and completed its ominion over the human mind. In explaining all the movements of the heavenly bodies by a system * In writing to Flamstead, Newton requests from him the long diame- ters of the orbits cf Jupiter and Saturn, that he " may see how the ses* guialt&raJ proportion Jills the heavens.'' 160 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. of vortices in a fluid medium diffused through the universe, Descartes had seized upon an analogy of the most alluring and deceitful kind. Those who had seen heavy bodies revolving in the eddies of a whirlpool, or in the gyrations of a vessel of water thrown into a circular motion, had no difficulty in conceiving how the planets might revolve round the sun by analogous movements. The mind instantly grasped at an explanation of so palpable a character, and which required for its development neither the exercise of patient thought nor the aid of mathe- matical skill. The talent and perspicuity with which the Cartesian system was expounded, and the show of experiments with which it was sustained, con- tributed powerfully to its adoption, while it derived a still higher sanction from the excellent character and the unaffected piety of its author. Thus intrenched, as the Cartesian system was, in the strongholds of the human mind, and fortified by its most obstinate prejudices, it was not to be won- dered at that the pure and sublime doctrines of the Principia were distrustfully received and persever- ingly resisted. The uninstructed mind could not readily admit the idea, that the great masses of the planets were suspended in empty space, and retained in then orbits by an invisible influence residing in the sun ; and even those philosophers who had been accustomed to the rigour of true scientific research, and who possessed sufficient mathematical skill for the examination of the Newtonian doctrines, viewed them at first as reviving the occult qualities of the ancient physics, and resisted their introduction with a pertinacity which it is not easy to explain. Preju- diced, no doubt, in favour of his own metaphysical views, Leibnitz himself misapprehended the princi- ples of the Newtonian philosophy, and endeavoured to demonstrate the truths in the Principia by the appli- cation of different principles. Huygens, who above all other men was qualified to appreciate the new philo* NEWTONIAN PHILOSOPHY. 161 sophy, rejected the doctrine of gravitation as existing ? between the individual particles of matter, and re- ; ceived it only as an attribute of the planetary masses, f John Bernouilli, one of the first mathematicians of j his age, opposed the philosophy of Newton. Mai- Iran, in the early part of his life, was a strenuous de- I fender of the system of vortices. Cassini and Ma- Iraldi were quite ignorant of the Principia, and occu- ipied themselves with the most absurd methods of I calculating the orbits of comets long after the New- I toman method had been established on the most I impregnable foundation ; and even Fontenelle, a man I of liberal views and extensive information, continued, I throughout the whole of his life, to maintain the I doctrines of Descartes. The Chevalier Louville of Paris had adopted the I Newtonian philosophy before 1720. S'Gravesande I had introduced it into the Dutch universities at a somewhat earlier period, and Maupertuis, in conse- quence of a visit which he paid to England in 1728, became a zealous defender of it; but notwithstand- ing these and some other examples that might be quoted, we must admit the truth of the remark of Voltaire, that though Newton survived the publica- tion of the Principia more than forty years, yet at the time of his death he had not above twenty fol- lowers out of England. With regard to the progress of the Newtonian philosophy in England, some difference of opinion has been entertained. Professor Playfair gives the following account of it. i; In the universities of England, though the Aristotelian physics had made an obstinate resistance, they had been supplanted by the Cartesian, which became firmly established about the time when their foundation began to be? sapped by the general progress of science, and par- ticularly by the discoveries of Newton. For more than thirty years after the publication of these dis- coveries, the system of vortices kept its ground; and 02 162 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. ia translation from the French into Latin of the sics of feohault, a work entirely Cartesian, con- tinued at Cambridge to be the text^-for philosophical instruction." About the year 1718,^ new and more elegant translation of the same book was published by Dr. Samuel Clarke, with the addition of notes, in which that profound and ingenious writer explained the views of Newton on the principal objects of discussion, so that the notes contained virtually a refutation of the text; they did so, however, only virtually, all appearance of argument and contro- versy being carefully avoided. Whether this escaped the notice of the learned doctor or not is uncertain, but the new translation, from its better Latinity, and the name of the editor, was readily admitted to all the academical honours which the old one had en- joyed. Thus the stratagem of Dr. Clarke com- pletely succeeded ; the tutor might prelect from the text, but the pupil would sometimes look into the notes ; and error is never so sure of being exposed as when the truth is placed close to it, side by side, without any thing to alarm prejudice, or awaken - from its lethargy the dread of innovation. Thus, therefore, the Newtonian philosophy first entered the university of Cambridge under the protection of the Cartesian." To this passage Professor Playfair adds the following as a note : — " The universities of St. Andrew's and Edinburgh were, I believe, the first in Britain where the New- sman philosophy was made the subject of the aca- demical prelections. For this distinction they are Indebted to James and David Gregory, the first in $ome respects the rival, but both the friends of Newton. Whiston bewails, in the anguish of his heart, the difference, in this respect, between those universities and his own. David Gregory taught in Edinburgh for several years prior to 1690, when he removed to Oxford ; and Whiston says, ' He had already caused several of his scholars to keep acts,; NEWTONIAN PHILOSOPHY. 163 as we call them, upon several branches of the New- Ionian philosophy, while we at Cambridge, poor I wretches, were ignominiously studying the fictitious | hypotheses of the Cartesians.'* I do not, however, i mean to say, that from this date the Cartesian phi- i losophy was expelled from those universities; the | Physics of Rohault were still in use as a text-book, — I at least occasionally, to a much later period than this, L and a great deal, no vx^^bt, depended on the character I of the individual. Professor Keill introduced the \ Newtonian philosophy in his lectures at Oxford in ; 1697 ; but the instructions of the tutors, which con- E stitute the real and efficient system of the univer- | sity, were not cast in that mould till long afterward." Adopting the same view of the subject, Mr. Dugald Stewart has stated, " that the philosophy of Newton was publicly taught by David Gregory at Edinburgh, and by his brother, James Gregory, at St. Andrew's,! before it was able to supplant the vortices of Des- cartes in that very university of which Newton was a member. It was in the Scottish universities that the philosophy of Locke, as well as that of Newton, was first adopted as a branch of academi- cal education." Anxious as we should have been to have awarded to Scotland the honour of having first adopted the Newtonian philosophy, yet a regard for historical truth compels us to take a different view of the sub- ject. It is well known that Sir Isaac Newton de- livered lectures on his own philosophy from the Lucasian chair before the publication of the Prin- cipia; and in the very page of Whiston's life quoted by Professor Playfair, he informs us that he had heard him read such lectures in the public schools, * Whiston's Memoirs of his own Life. f " Dr. Reid states, that James Gregory, Professor of Philosophy at St. Andrew's, printed a thesis at Edinburgh in 1690, containing twenty- ftvo nr»sifinn<5 nf which t\*r»3ntv_twA w*ir*> n /»mnn*>fiH r»f N>.wtnn's Prin« cipia." 164 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. though at that time he did not at all understand them. Newton continued to lecture till 1699, and occasionally, we presume, till 1703, when Whiston became his successor, having been appointed his deputy in 1699. In both of these capacities Wins- ton delivered in the public schools a course of lec- tures on astronomy, and a course of physico-mathe- matical lectures, in which the mathematical philoso- phy of Newton was explained and demonstrated, and both these courses were published, the one in 1707, and the other in 1710, " for the use of the young men in the university." In 1707, the cele- brated blind mathematician Nicholas Saunderson took up his residence in Christ's College without being admitted a member of that body. The society not only allotted to him apartments, but gave him the free use of their library. With the concurrence of Whiston he delivered a course of lectures " on the Principia, Optics, and Universal Arithmetic of Newton," and the popularity of these lectures was so great, that Sir Isaac corresponded on the subject of • -them with their author ; and on the ejection of Whiston from the Lucasian chair in 1711, Saunderson was appointed his successor. In this important office he continued to teach the Newtonian philosophy till the time of his death, which took place in 1739. But while the Newtonian philosophy was thus regularly taught in Cambridge, after the publication of the Principia, there were not wanting other exer- tions for accelerating its progress. About 1694, the celebrated Dr. Samuel Clarke, while an under-grad- uate, defended, in the public schools, a question taken from the Newtonian philosophy; and his translation of Rohault's Physics, which contains 'references in the notes to the Principia, and which was published in 1697 (and not in 1718, as stated by Professor Playfair), shows how early the Cartesian system was attacked by the disciples of Newton. The author of the Life of Saunderson informs us, that PROGRESS IN ENGLAND. 165 >lic exercises or acts founded on every part of the fewtonian system were veiy common about 1707, and so general \vere such studies in the university, ! that the Principia rose to four times its original • price.* One of the most ardent votaries of the f- Newtonian philosophy was Dr. Laughton, who had t been tutor in Glare Hall from 1694, and it is probable Ithat during the whole, or at least a greater part, of [his tutorship he had inculcated the same doctrines. lln 1709-10, when he was proctor of that college, in- ^ stead of appointing a moderator, he discharged the \ office himself, and devoted his most active exertions | to the promotion of mathematical knowledge. Pre- (vious to this, he had even published a paper of ques- tions on the Newtonian philosophy, which appear to have been used as theses for disputations ; and such was his ardour and learning that they powerfully contributed to the popularity of his college. Be- tween 1706 and 1716, the year of his death, the cele- brated Roger Cotes, the friend and disciple of New- ton, filled the Plumian chair of astronomy and ex- perimental philosophy at Cambridge. During this period he edited the second edition of the Principia, which he enriched with an admirable preface, and thus contributed, by his writings as well as by his lectures, to advance the philosophy of his master. About the same time, the learned Dr. Bentley, who first made known the philosophy of his friend to the readers of general literature, filled the high office of master of Trinity College, and could not fail to have exerted his utmost influence in propagating doctrines which he so greatly admired. Had any opposition been offered to the introduction of the true system of the universe, the talents and influence of these individuals would have immediately suppressed it; but no such opposition seems to have been made ; * Nichols's Literary Anecdotes> vol. iii. p. 322. Cotes states in hi« preface to the second edition of the Principia, that copies of the first edition could only be obtained at an immense price. 166 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. and though there may have been individuals at Cam- bridge ignorant of mathematical science, who ad- hered to the system of Descartes, and patronised the study of the Physics of Rohault, yet it is pro- bable that similar persons existed in the universities of Edinburgh and St. Andrew's ; and we cannot re- gard their adherence to error as disproving the gen- eral fact, that the philosophy of Newton was quickly introduced into all the universities of Great Britain. But while the mathematical principles of the New- tonian system were ably expounded in our seats of learning, its physical truths were generally studied, and were explained and communicated to the public by various lecturers on experimental philosophy. The celebrated Locke, who was incapable of under- standing the Prlncipia from his want of mathemati- cal knowledge, inquired ofjHuygens if all the mathe- matical propositions in that work were true. When he was assured that he might depend upon their cer- tainty, he took them for granted, and carefully ex- amined the reasonings and corollaries deduced from them. In this manner he acquired a knowledge of the physical truths in the Principia, and became a firm believer in the discoveries which it contained. In the same manner he studied the treatise on Op- tics, and made himself master of every part of it which was not mathematical.* From a manuscript of Sir Isaac Newton's, entitled " A demonstration that the planets, by their gravity towards the sun, may move in ellipses,! found among the papers of Mr. Locke, and published by Lord King," it would appear that he himself had been at considerable trouble in explaining to his friend that interesting ; doctrine. Thissmanuscript is endorsed, " Mr. New- ton, March, 1689." It begins with three hypotheses * Preface to Desaguliers's Experimental Philosophy. Dr. Desaguliera states that he was told this anecdote several times by Sii Isaac Newtou himself. t The Life of John Locke, p. 209-215, Lond. 1829. PROGRESS IN ENGLAND. (the first two being the two laws of motion, and the third the parallelogram of motion), which introduce the proposition of the proportionality of the areas to the times in motions round an immoveable centre of attraction.* Three lemmas, containing properties of the ellipse, then prepare the reader for the cele- brated proposition, that when a body moves in an ellipse,! the attraction is reciprocally as the square of the distance of the body from the focus to which it is attracted. These propositions are demonstrated in a more popular manner than in the Principia, but there can be no doubt that, even in their present modified form, they were beyond the capacity of Mr. Locke. Dr. John Keill was the first person who publicly taught natural philosophy by experiments. Desa- guliers informs us that this author " laid down very simple propositions,which he proved by experiments, and from these he deduced others more compound, which he still confirmed by experiments, till he had instructed his auditors in the laws of motion, the principles of hydrostatics and optics, and some of the chief propositions of Sir Isaac Newton concern- ing light and colours. He began these courses in Oxford about the year 1704 or 1705, and in that way introduced the love of the Newtonian philosophy." When Dr. Keill left the university, Desaguliers be- gan to teach the Newtonian philosophy by experi- ments. He commenced his lectures at Harthall in Oxford, in 1710, and delivered more than a hundred and twenty courses ; and when he went to settle in London in 1713, he informs us that he found " the Newtonian philosophy generally received among persons of all ranks and professions, and even among the ladies by the help of experiments." Such were the steps by which the Newtonian phi- losophy was established in Great Britain. From * Principia, lib. i. prop. i. 168 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. the time of* the publication of the Principia, its mathematical doctrines formed a regular part of aca- demical education; and before twenty years had elapsed, its physical truths were communicated to the public in popular lectures illustrated by experi- ments, and accommodated to the capacities of those who were not versed in mathematical knowledge. The Cartesian system, though it may have lingered for a while in the recesses of our universities, was soon overturned ; and long before his death, Newton enjoyed the high satisfaction of seeing his philoso- phy triumphant in his native land. CHAPTER XII. Doctrine cf Infinite Quantities — Labours of Pappus — Kepler — Cavalert — Roberval — Fermat — Wall is — Newton discovers the Hmomial Theo- rem— and the Doctrine of Fluxions in 1666 — His Manuscript Work containing this Doctrine communicated to his Friends — His Treatise on Fluxions— His Mathematical Tracts — His Universal Arithmetic — His Methodus Differentialis—His Geometria Analytica — His Solu' tion of the Problems proposed by Bernouilli aud Leibnitz — Account of the celebrated Dispute respecting the Invention of Ftuxions—Com- mercium Epistolicum — Report of the Royal Society -^General View of the Controversy. PREVIOUS to the time of Newton, the doctrine of infinite quantities had been the subject of profound study. The ancients made the first step in this curious inquiry by a rude though ingenious attempt to determine the area of curves. The method of exhaustions which was used for this purpose con- sisted in finding a given rectilineal area to which the inscribed and circumscribed polygonal figures con- tinually approached by increasing the number of their sides. This area was obviously the area of the curve, and in the case of the parabola it was found by Archimedes to be two-thirds of the area INFINITE QUANTITIES. 169 ied by multiplying the ordinate by the abscissa, ough the synthetical demonstration of the re- ts was perfectly conclusive, yet the method itself was limited and imperfect. The celebrated Pappus of Alexandria followed Archimedes in the same inquiries ; and in his demon- stration of the property of the centre of gravity of a plane figure, by which we may determine the solid formed by its revolution, he has shadowed forth the discoveries of later times. In his curious tract on Stereometry, published in 615, Kepler made some advances in the doctrine »f infinitesimals. Prompted to the task by a dis- pute with the seller of some casks of wine, he studied the measurement of solids formed by the revolution of a curve round any line whatever. In solving some of the simplest of Jhese problems, he conceived a circle to be formed of an infinite number of triangles having all their vertices in the centre, and their infinitely small bases in the circum- ference of the circle, and by thus rendering familiar the idea of quantities infinitely great and infinitely small, he gave an impulse to this branch of mathe- matics. The failure of Kepler, too, in solving some of the more difficult of the problems which he him- self proposed roused the attention of geometers, and seems particularly to have attracted the notice of Cavaleri. This ingenious mathematician was born at Milan in 1598, and was Professor of Geometry at Bologna. In his method of Indivisibles, which was published in 1635, he considered a line as composed of an in- finite number of points, a surface of an infinite number of lines, and a solid of an infinite number of surfaces ; and he lays it down as an axiom that the infinite sums of such lines and surfaces have the same ratio when compared with the linear or super- ficial unit, as the surfaces and solids which are to be determined. As it is not true that an infinite P 170 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. number of infinitely small points can make a Jin or an infinite number of infinitely small lines a sur- face, Pascal removed this verbal difficulty by con- sidering a line as composed of an infinite number of infinilely short lines, a surface as composed of an infinite number of infinitely narrow parallelo- grams, and a solid of an infinite number of infinitely thin solids. But, independent of this correction, the conclusions deduced by Cavaleri are rigorously true, and his method of ascertaining the ratios of areas and solids to one another, and the theorems « which he deduced from it may be considered as forming an era in mathematics. By the application of this method, Roberval and Toricelli showed that the area of the cycloid is three times that of its generating circle, and the former extended the method of Cavaleri to the case where the powers of the terms of the arithmetical pro- gression to be summed were fractional. In applying the doctrine of infinitely small quanti- ties to determine the tangents of curves, and the maxima and minima of their ordinates, both Ro- berval and Fermat made a near approach to the invention of fluxions — so near indeed that both Lagrange and Laplace* have pronounced the latter to be the true inventer of the differential calculus. Roberval supposed the poh t which describes a curve to be actuated by two motions, by the compo- sition of which it moves in the direction of a tan- gent; and had he possessed the method of fluxions, he could, in every case, have determined the rela- tive velocities of these motions, which depend on the nature of the curve, and consequently the direction of the tangent which he assumed to be in the diagonal of a parallelogram whose sides had the * " On pent regarder Fermat," says Lagrange, " comme le premier inventeur des nouveaux calculs ;" and Laplace observes, "II paraitque Fermat, le veritable inventeur du calcnl diflerentiel, Pait envisage comma un cas particulier d*j celui des di^*erences," &c. INFINITE QUANTITIES. 171 same ratio as the velocities. But as he was able ito determine these velocities only in the conic sec- |tions, &c. his ingenious method had but few appli- cations. The labours of Peter Fermat, a counsellor of the parliament of Toulouse, approached still nearer to the fluxionary calculus. In his method of deter- mining the maxima and minima of the ordinates of curves, he substitutes x-\-e for the independent variable x in the function which is to become a .maximum, and as these two expressions should be equal when e becomes infinitely small or 0, he frees this equation from surds and radicals, and after di- viding the whole by e, e is made = 0, and the equation for the maximum is thus obtained. Upon a similar principle he founded his method of drawing tangents to curves. But though the methods thus used by Fermat are in principle the same with those which connect the theory of tangents and of maxima and minima with the analytical method of exhibit- ing the differential calculus, yet it is a singular ex- ample of national partiality to consider the inventer of these methods as the inventer of the method of, fluxions. " One might be led," says Mr. Herschel, " to sup- pose by Laplace's expression that the calculus of finite differences had then already assumed a sys- tematic form, and that Fermat had actually observed the relation between the two calculi, and derived the one from the other. The latter conclusion would scarcely be less correct than the former. No method can justly be regarded as bearing any anal- ogy to the differential calculus which does not lay down a system of rules (no matter on what consid- erations founded, by what names called, or by what extraneous matter enveloped) by means of which the second term of the development of any function of x-{-e in powers of e, can be correctly calculated, •quae extendet se,' to use Newton's expression, 172 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. * citra ullum molestum calculum in terminis surdis seque ac in integris procedens.' It would be strange to suppose Fermat or any other in possession of such a method before any single surd quantity had ever been developed in a series. But, in point of fact, his writings present no trace of the kind ; and this, though fatal to his claim, is allowed by both the geometers cited. Hear Lagrange's candid avowal. * II fait disparaitre dans cette equation,' that of the maximum between x and e, ' les radicaux et les frac- tions s'il y en a.' Laplace, too, declares that ' il sa- voit etendre son calcul aux fonctions irrationelles en se debarrassant des irrationalites par 1'elevation des radicaux aux puissances." This is at once giv- ing up the point in question. It is allowing une- quivocally that Fermat in these processes only took a circuitous route to avoid a difficulty which it is one of the most express objects of the differential calculus to face and surmount. The whole claim of the French geometer arises from a confusion (too often made) of the calculus and its applications, the means and the end, under the sweeping head of * nouveaux calculs' on the one hand, and an asser- tion somewhat too unqualified, advanced in the warmth and generality of a preface, on the other."* The discoveries of Fermat were improved and simplified by Hudde, Huygens, and Barrow ; and by the publication of the Arithmetic of Infinites by Dr. Wallis, Savilian professor of geometry at Oxford, mathematicians were conducted to the very entrance of a new and untrodden field of discovery. This distinguished author had effected the quadrature of all curves whose ordinates can be expressed by any direct integral powers ; and though he had extended his conclusions to the cases where the ordinates are xpressed by the inverse or fractional powers, yet * Art. Mathematics, in the Edinburgh Encyclopaedia, volume xiii. p. 365. ARITHMETIC OF INFINITES. 173 ie failed in its application. Nicolas Mercator (Kauff- tian) surmounted the difficulty by which Wallis nad been baffled, by the continued division of the numerator by the denominator to infinity, and then applying Wallis's method to the resulting positive Bowers. In this way he obtained, in 1667, the first general quadrature of the hyperbola, and, at the ame time, gave the regular development of a func- ion in series. In order to obtain the quadrature of the circle, Dr. Vallis considered that if the equations of the curves f which he had given the quadrature were arranged i a series, beginning with the most simple, these reas would form another series. He saw also that tie equation of the circle was intermediate between he first and second terms of the first series, or etween the equation of a straight line and that of parabola, and hence he concluded, that by interpo- ating a term between the first and second term of be second series, he would obtain the area of the ircle. In pursuing this singularly beautiful thought, Dr. Wallis did not succeed in obtaining the indefinite quadrature of the circle, because he did not employ (general exponents; but he was led to express the entire area of the circle by a fraction, the numerator and denominator of which are each obtained by the continued multiplication of a certain series of numbers. Such was the state of this branch of mathematical science, when Newton, at an early age, directed to it the vigour of his mind. At the very beginning of his mathematical studies, when the works of Dr. Wallis fell into his hands, he was led to consider how he could interpolate the general values of the areas in the second series of that mathematician. With this view he investigated the arithmetical law of the coefficients of the series, and obtained a general method of interpolating, not only the series above referred to, but also other series. These P2 174 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. were the first steps taken by Newton, and, as he himself informs us, they would have entirely escaped from his memory if he had not, a few weeks before,* found the notes which he made upon the subject. When he had obtained this method, it oc- curred to him that the very same process was appli- cable to the ordinates, and, by following out this idea, he discovered the general method of reducing radical quantities composed of several terms into infinite series, and was thus led to the discovery of the celebrated Binomial Theorem. He now neglected entirely his methods of interpolation, and employed that theorem alone as the easiest and most direct method for the quadratures of curves, and in the solu- tion of many questions which had not even been attempted by the most skilful mathematicians. After having applied the Binomial theorem to the rectification of curves, and to the determination of the surfaces and contents of solids, and the position of their centres of gravity, he discovered the general principle of deducing the areas of curves from the Vjyrdinate, by considering the area as a nascent quan- tity, increasing by continual fluxion in the propor- tion of the length of the ordinate, and supposing the abscissa to increase uniformly in proportion to the time. In imitation of Cavalerius, he called the momentary increment of a line a point, though it is not a geometrical point, but an infinitely short line ; and the momentary increment of an area or surface he called a line, though it is not a geometrical line, but an infinitely narrow surface. By thus regarding lines as generated by the motion of points, surfaces by the motions of lines, and solids by the motion of surfaces, and by considering that the ordinates, ab- scissae, &c. of curves thus formed, vary according to a regular law depending on the equation of the * These facts are mentioned in Newton's letter to Oldenburgh, Octo» ber 24, 1676. DOCTRINE OF FLUXIONS. 173 :urve. he deduces from this equation the velocities .vith which these quantities are generated ; and by ;he rules of infinite series he obtains the ultimate /alue of the quantity required. To the velocities Sivith which every line or quantity is generated, LVevvton gave the name of Fluxions, and to the lines or quantities themselves that of Fluents. This nethod constitutes the doctrine of fluxions v^hich Newton had invented previous to 1666, when the Breaking out of the plague at Cambridge drove him Tom that city, and turned his attention to other subjects. But though Newton had not communicated this invention to any of his friends, he composed ilis treatise, entitled Analysis per equationes numero terminorum infinitas, in which the principle of fluxions and its numerous applications are clearly pointed out. In the month of June, 1669, he communicated his work to Dr. Barrow, who mentions it in a letter o Mr. Collins, dated the 20th June, 1669, as the pro- duction of a friend of his residing at Cambiidge, who possesses a fine genius for such inquiries. On the 1st July, he transmitted the work to Collins; and laving received his approbation of it, he informs him ;hat the name of the author of it was Newton, a ellow of his own college, and a young man who lad only two years before taken his degree of M.A. ollins 'took a copy of this treatise, and returned the original to Dr. Barrow ; and this copy having been bund among Collins's papers by his friend Mr. Wil- iam Jones, and compared with the original manu- cript Arrowed from Newton, it was published with he coHsent of Newton in 1711, nearly fifty years after it was written. Though the discoveries contained in this treatise were not at first given to the world, yet they were made generally known to mathematician, by the correspondence of Collins, who communicated them to James Gregory; to MM. Bertet and Vernon in 176 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. France; to Slusius in Holland; to Borelli in Italy? and to Strode, Townsend, and Oldenburg, in letter* dated between 1669 and 1672. Hitherto the method of fluxions was known only to the friends of Newton and their correspondents ; but, in the first edition of the Principia, which ap- peared in 1687, he published, for the first time, the ^ fundamental principle of the fluxionary calculus, in the second lemma of the second book. No infor- mation, however, is here given respecting the algo- rithm or notation of the calculus ; and it was not till 1693-5[?] that it was communicated to the mathemat- ical world in the second volume of Dr. Wallis's works, which were published in that year. This informa- tion was extracted from two letters of Newton written in 1692. About the year 1672, Newton had undertaken to publish an edition of Kinckhuysen's Algebra, with notes and additions. He therefore drew up a trea- tise, entitled, A Method of Fluxions, which he pro- posed as an introduction to that work ; but the fear of being involved in disputes about this new dis- covery, or perhaps the wish to render it more com- plete, or to have the sole advantage of employing it in his physical researches, induced him to abandon this design. At a later period of his life he again resolved to give it to the world ; but it did not ap- pear till after his death, when it was translated into English, and published in 1736, with a commentary by Mr. John Colson, Professor of Mathematics in Cambridge.* To the first edition of Newton's Optics^g^hich appeared in 1704, there were added two mathematical * Dr. Pomberton informs us that he had prevailed upon Sir Isaac to publish this treatise during his lifetime, and that he had for this purpose examined all the calculations and prepared part of the figures. But as the latter part of the treatise had never been finished, Sir Isaac was about to let him have other papers to supply what was wanting, when his death put a stop to the plan.—Preface to Pemberton's View qf Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy DOCTRINF OF FLUXIONS. 177 realises, entitled, Tractatus duo de speciebus et mag- ittudine figurarum curvilinearum, the one bearing the itle of Tractatus de Quadraiura Curvarum, and the )ther Enumeratio linjarum tertii ordinis. The first ;ontains an explanation of the doctrine of fluxions, ind of its application to the quadrature of curves ; md the second a classification of seventy-two curves )f the third order, with an account of their proper- ies. The reason for publishing these two tracts in lis Optics (in the subsequent editions of which they ire omitted) is thus stated in the advertisement : — In a letter written to M. Leibnitz in the year 1679, ind published by Dr. Wallis, I mentioned a method >y which I had found some general theorems about squaring curvilinear figures on comparing them with he conic sections, or other the simplest figures with vhich they might be compared. And some years igo I lent out a manuscript containing such theo- •ems ; and having since met with some things copied >ut of it, I have on this occasion made it public, pre- ixing to it an introduction, and joining a scholium 3oncerning that method. And I have joined with it mother small tract concerning the curvilineal figures the second kind, which was also written many fears ago, and made known to some friends, who lave solicited the making it public." In the year 1707, Mr. Whiston published the alge- )raical lectures which Newton had, during nine years, delivered at Cambridge, under the title of Arithmetica Universalis, sive de Compositions et Resolutions Arith- inetica Liber. We are not accurately informed how Mr. Whiston obtained pr osession of this work ; but it is stated by one of the editors of the English edition, that " Mr. Whiston thinking it a pity that so noble and useful a work should be doomed to a col- lege confinement, obtained leave to make it public." It was soon afterward translated into English by Mr. Ralphson ; and a second edition of it, with im- provements by the author, was published at London 178 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. in 1712, by Dr. Maclim, secretary to the Royal ciety. With the view of stimulating mathematicians 1o write annotations on this admirable work, the celebrated S'Gravesande published a tract, entitled, Specimen Commentarii in Arithmeticam Universalem ; and Maclaurin's Algebra seems to have been drawn up in consequence of this appeal. Among the mathematical works of Newton we must not omit to enumerate a small tract entitled, Methodus Differ entialis, which was published with his consent in 1711. It consists of six propositions,, which contain a method of drawing a parabolic curv^ through any given number of points, and which arer useful for constructing tables by the interpolation of; series, and for solving problems depending on the quadrature of curves. Another mathematical treatise of Newton's was published for the first time in 1779, in Dr. Horsley's edition of his works.* It is entitled, Artis Analytics Specimina, vel Geometria Analylica. In editing this work, which occupies about 130 quarto pages, Dr. Horsley used three manuscripts, one of which was in the handwriting of the author ; .another, written; in an unknown hand, was given by Mr. William: Jones to the Honourable Charles Cavendish ; and a third, copied from this by Mr. James Wilson, the .editor of Robins's works, was given to Dr. Horsley by Mr. John Nourse, bookseller to the king. Dr. Horsley has divided it into twelve chapters, which; treat of infinite series ; of the reduction of affected equations; of the specious resolution of equations; of the doctrine of fluxions; of maxima and minima; of drawing tangents to curves ; of the radius of cur* vature ; of the quadrature of curves ; of the area of curves which are comparable with the conic sec* tions ; of the construction of mechanical problems; and on finding the lengths of curves. * IsEci Newtoni Opera quae extant omnia, vol. i. p. 38S-519. SOLUTION OF PROBLEMS. 179 In enumerating the mathematical works of our rathor, we must not overlook his solutions of the celebrated problems proposed by Bernouilli and Leibnitz. On the Kalends of January, 1697, John 3ernouilli addressed a letter to the most distin- guished mathematicians in Europe,f challenging hem to solve the two following problems : 1. To determine the curve line connecting two ven points which are at different distances from he horizon, and not in the same vertical line, along hich a body passing by its own gravity, and begin- ing to move at the upper point, shall descend to the ower point in the shortest time possible. 2. To find a curve line of this property that the wo segments of a right line drawn from a given oint through the curve, being raised to any given ower, and taken together, may make every where tie same sum. On the day after he received these problems, Newton addressed to Mr. Charles Montague, the ^resident of the Royal Society, a solution of them oth. He announced that the curve required in the rst problem must be a cycloid, and he gave a nethod of determining it. He solved also the econd problem, and he showed that by the same method other curves might be found which shall cut ff three or more segments having the like proper- es. Leibnitz, who was struck with the beauty of le problem, requested Bernouilli, who had allowed ix months for its solution, to extend the period to welve months. This delay was readily granted, olutions were obtained from Newton, Leibnitz, and Marquis de L'Hopital ; and although that of Newton was anonymous, yet Bernouilli recognised it his powerful mind, " tanquam? says he, " ex ngue leonem" as the lion is known by his claw. The last mathematical effort of our author was * " Acutissimis aui toto orbe florent Mathematicis." (180 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. made with his usual success, in solving a problem which Leibnitz proposed in 1716, in a letter to the Abbe Conti, " for the purpose, as he expressed it of feeling the pulse of the English analysts." The object of this problem was to determine the curve which should cut at right angles an infinity of curves of a given nature, but expressible by the same equa- tion. Newton received this problem about five o'clock in the afternoon, as he was returning from the Mint; and though the problem was extremely, difficult, and he himself much fatigued with business,* yet he finished the solution of it before he wenk to bed. Such is a brief account of the mathematical writ- ings of Sir Isaac Newton, not one of which were voluntarily communicated to the world by himself, The publication of his Universal Arithmetic is said to have been a breach of confidence on the part of Whiston ; and, however this may be, it was an un- finished work, never designed for the public. The publication of his Quadrature of Curves, and of hii, Enumeration of Curve Lines, was rendered neces* sary, in consequence of plagiarisms from the manu* scripts of them which he had lent to his friends, and the rest of his analytical writings did not appear till after his death. It is not easy to penetrate into the motives by which this great man was on these occasions actuated. If his object was to keep pos- session of his discoveries till he had brought them to a higher degree of perfection, we may approve of the propriety, though we cannot admire the prudence of such a step. If he wished to retain to himself his own methods, in order that he alone might have the advantage of them in prosecuting his physical inquiries, we cannot reconcile so selfish a measure with that openness and generosity of character which marked the whole of his life. If he withheld his labours from the world in order to avoid the dis~ putes and contentions to which they might give rise, HISTORY OF FLUXIONS. 181 [opted the very worst method of securing his iquillity. That this was the leading motive under ch he acted, there is little reason to doubt. The arty delay in the publication of his method of. flux- ons, after the breaking out of the plague at Cam- Bridge, was probably owing to his not having com- peted the algorithm of that calculus ; but no apology :an be made for the imprudence of withholding it my longer from the public. Had he published this loble discovery even previous to 1673, when his preat rival had not even entered upon those studies tvhich led him to the same method, he would have >ecured to himself the undivided honour of the nvention, and Leibnitz could have aspired to no other ame but that of an improver of the doctrine of flux- ons. But he unfortunately acted otherwise. He Announced to his friends that he possessed a method }f great generality and power ; he communicated to hem a general account of its principles and applica- ions ; and the information which was thus conveyed lirected the attention of mathematicians to subjects o which they might not have otherwise applied their Dowers. In this way the discoveries which he had previously made were made subsequently by others ; and Leibnitz, in place of appearing in the theatre of cience as the disciple and the follower of Newton, tood forth with all the dignity of a rival ; and, by he early publication of his discoveries had nearly placed himself on the throne which Newton was destined to ascend. It would be inconsistent with the popular nature of a work like this, to enter into a detailed history of the dispute between Newton and Leibnitz re- specting the invention of fluxions. A brief and general account of it, however, is indispensable. In the beginning of 1673, Leibnitz came to London in the suite of the Duke of Hanover, and he became acquainted with the great men who then adorned the capital of England. Among these was Olden- Q 182 SBR ISAAC NEWTON. burg, a countryman of his own, who was then sec- retary to the Royal Society. About the beginning of March, in the same year, Leibnitz went to Paris, where, with the assistance of Huygens, he devoted himself to the study of the higher geometry. In the month of July he renewed his correspondence with Oldenburg, and he communicated to him some of the discoveries which he had made relative to series, particularly the series for a circular arc in terms of the tangent. Oldenburg informed him in return of the discoveries on series which had been made by Newton and Gregory ; and in 1676 Newton commu- nicated to him, through Oldenburg, a letter of fifteeE closely printed quarto pages, containing many of his analytical discoveries, and stating that he possessed a general method of drawing tangents, which he thought it necessary to conceal in two sentences of transposed characters. In this letter neither the method of fluxions nor any of its principles are communicated ; but the superiority of the method over all others is so fully described, that Leibnitz could scarcely fail to discover that Newton pos- sessed that secret of which geometers had so long been in quest. Had Leibnitz at the time of receiving this Icttei been entirely ignorant of his own differential method, the information thus conveyed to him by Newton could not fail to stimulate his curiosity, and excite his mightiest efforts to obtain possession of so great a secret. That this new method was intimately connected with the subject of series was clearly in- dicated by Newton; and as Leibnitz was deeply versed in this branch of analysis, it is far from im- probable that a mind of such strength and acuteness might attain his object by direct investigation. That this was the case may be inferred from his letter to Oldenburg (to be communicated to Newton) of the 21st June, 1677, where he mentions that he had for some time been in possession of a method of draw- HISTORY OF FLUXIONS. 183 ng tangents more general than that of Slusius, lamely, by the differences of ordinates. He then Droceeds with the utmost frankness to explain this nethod, which was no other than th^. differential 3alculus. He describes the algorithm which he had idopted, the formation of differential equations, and he application of the calculus to various geometrical and analytical questions. No answer seems to have :>een returned to this letter either by Newton or Oldenburg, and, with the exception of a short letter rom Leibnitz to Oldenburg, dated 12th July, 1677, 10 further correspondence seems to have taken )lace. This, no doubt, arose from the death of Ol- denburg in the month of August, 1677,* when the wo rival geometers pursued their researches with ill the ardour which the greatness of the subject Was so well calculated to inspire. In the hands of Leibnitz the differential calculus nade rapid progress. In the Acta Eruditorum, which >vas published at Leipsic in November, 1684, he gave tie first account of it, describing its algorithm in the ame manner as he had done in his letter to Olden- urg, and pointing out its application to the drawing f tangents, and the determination of maxima and ninima. He makes a remote reference to the simi« ar calculus of Newton, but lays no claim to the sole avention of the differential method. In the same vork for June, 1686, he resumes the subject ; and vhen Newton had not published a single word upon * Henry Oldenburg, whose name is so intimately associated with the history of Newton's discoveries, was born at Bremen, and was consul from that town to London during the usurpation of Cromwell. Having lost his office, and being compelled to seek the means of subsistence, he became tutor to an English nobleman, whom he accompanied to Oxford in 1656. During his residence in that city he became acquainted with the philosophers who established the Royal Society, and upon the death of William Crown, the first secretary, he was appointed in 1663, joint secretary along with Mr. Wilkins. He kept up an extensive correspond- ence with the philosophers of all nations, and he was the author of sev- eral papers in the Philosophical Transactions, and of some works which have not acquired much celebrity. He died at Charlton, near Greea wieh, in August, 1677. 184 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. fluxions, and had not even made known his notation the differential calculus was making rapid advance: on the Continent, and in the hands of James anc John Bernouilli had proved the means of solving some of the most important and difficult problems. The silence of Newton was at last broken, and ir the second lemma of the second book of the Prin- cipia, he explained the fundamental principle of the fluxionary calculus. His explanation, which occu- pied only three pages, was terminated with the fol- lowing scholium: — "In a correspondence which took place about ten years ago between that very skilful geometer, G. G. Leibnitz, and myself, I an- nounced to him that I possessed a method of deter- mining maxima and minima, of drawing tangents, and of performing similar operations which was equally applicable to rational and irrational quanti- ties, and concealed the same in transposed letters involving this sentence, (data equations quotcunque fluentes quantitates involvente^ fluxiones invenire et vice versa). This illustrious man replied that he also had fallen on a method of the same kind, and he communicated to me his method which scarcely differed from mine except in the notation [and in the idea of the generation of quantities."]* This cele- brated scholium, which is so often referred to in the present controversy, has, in our opinion, been much misapprehended. While M. Biot considers it as " eternalizing the rights of Leibnitz by recognising them in the Principia," Professor Playfair regards it as containing " a highly favourable opinion on the subject of the discoveries of Leibnitz." To us it appears to be nothing more than the simple state- ment of the fact, that the method communicated by Leibnitz was nearly the same as his own ; and this much he might have said, whether he believed that Leibnitz had seen the fluxionary calculus among the * These words in brackets are in the second edition, but not in the first. HISTORY OF FLUXIONS. 185 >apers of Collins, or was the independent inventor >f his own. It is more than probable, indeed, that vhen Newton wrote this scholium he regarded bnitz as a second inventor ; but when he found hat Leibnitz and his friends had showed a willing- tess to believe, and had even ventured to throw out he suspicion, that he himself had borrowed the doc- jine of fluxions from the differential calculus, he eems to have altered the opinion which he had ormed of his rival, and to have been willing in his urn to retort the charge. This change of opinion was brought about by a eries of circumstances over which lie had no con- rol. M. Nicolas Fatio de Duillier, a Swiss mathe- natician, resident in London, communicated to the loyal Society, in 1699, a paper on the line of quick- st descent, which contains the following observa- ions : — " Compelled by the evidence of facts, I hold Vewton to have been the first inventor of this cal- ulus, and the earliest by several years ; and whether ^eibnitz, the second inventor, has borrowed any thing' rom the other, I would prefer to my own judgment hat of those who have seen the letters and other opies of the same manuscripts of Newton." This mprudent remark, which by no means amounts to a harge of plagiarism, for Leibnitz is actually desig- tated the second inventor, may be considered as howing that the English mathematicians had been herishing suspicions unfavourable to Leibnitz, and here can be no doubt that a feeling had long pre- vailed that this mathematician either had, or might lave seen, among the papers of Collins, the u Analy- is per Equationes, fyc.? which contained the prin- .iples of the fluxionary method. Leibnitz replied to he remark of Duillier with much good feeling. le appealed to the facts as exhibited in his corres- pondence with Oldenburg ; he referred to Newton's scholium as a testimony in his favour ; and, without disDuting or acknowledging the priority of Newton's 186 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. claim, he asserted his own right to the invention of the differential calculus . Fatio transmitted a reply to the Leipsic Acts ; but the editor refused to insert it. The dispute, therefore, terminated, and the feelings of the contending parties continued for some time in a state of repose, though ready to break out on the slightest provocation. When Newton's Optics appeared in 1704, accom- panied by his Treatise on the Quadrature of Curves, and his enumeration of lines of the third order, the editor of the Leipsic Acts (whom Newton supposed to be Leibnitz himself) took occasion to review the first of these tracts. After giving an imperfect analysis of its contents, he compared the method of fluxions with the differential calculus, and, in a sentence of some ambiguity, he states that Newton employed fluxions in place of the differences of Leib- nitz, and made use of them in his Principia in the same manner as Honoratus Fabri, in his Synopsis of Geometry, had substituted progressive motion in place of the indivisibles of Cavaleri.* As Fabri, therefore, was not the inventor of the method which is here referred to, but borrowed it from Ca- valeri, and only changed the mode of its expression, there can be no doubt that the artful insinuation contained in the above passage was intended to con- vey the impression that Newton had stolen his me- thod of fluxions from Leibnitz. The indirect char- acter of this attack, in place of mitigating its severity, renders it doubly odious ; and we are persuaded that no candid reader can peruse the passage without a strong conviction that it justifies, in the fullest man- r * As this passage is of essential importance in this controversy, we shall give it in the original. " Pro dijferentiis igitur Leibnitianis D. Newtonus adhibet, semper que adhibuit^JluxioneSj quee sunt quam prox- ime ut fluentium augmenta, sequalibus temporis particulis quam mini- mis genita ; iisque tarn in suis Principiis Naturae Mathematicis, turn in aliis postea editis, elegantcr est usus ; quern admodum et Honoratus Fabrius in sua Synopsi Geometrica, motuumque progressus Cavalle- riancs methodo siibstituit." HISTORY OF FLUXIONS. 187 aer, the indignant feelings which it excited among the English philosophers. If Leibnitz was the author of the review, or if he was in any way a party to it, he merited the full measure of rebuke which was dealt out to him by the friends of Newton, and de- served those severe reprisals which doubtless im- bittered the rest of his days. He who dared to ac- ! cuse a man like Newton, or indeed any man holding a fair character in society, with the odious crime of ; plagiarism, placed himself without the pale of the ordinary courtesies of life, and deserved to have f the same charge thrown back upon himself. The , man who conceives his fellow to be capable of such intellectual felony, avows the possibility of himself I committing it, and almost substantiates the weakest evidence of the worst accusers. Dr. Keill, as the representative of Newton's friends, could not brook this base attack upon his countryman. In a letter printed in the Philosophi- cal Transactions for 1708, he maintained that Newton was " beyond all doubt" the first inventor of fluxions. He referred for a direct proof of this to his letters published by Wallis ; and he asserted " that the same calculus was afterward published by Leibnitz, the name and the mode of notation being changed-." If the reader is disposed to consider this passage as retorting the charge of plagiarism upon Leibnitz, he will readily admit that the mode of, its expres- sion is neither so coarse nor so insidious as that which is used by the writer in the Leipsic Acts. In a letter to Hans Sloane, dated March, 1711, Leib- nitz complained to the Royal Society of the treat- ment he had received. He expressed his conviction that Keill had erred more from rashness of judgment than from any improper motive, and that he did not regard the accusation as a calumny; and he re- quested that the society would oblige Mr. Keill to disown publicly the injurious sense which his words might bear. When this letter was read to the 188 «IR ISAAC NEWTON. society, Keill justified himself to Sir Isaac Newton and the other members by showing them the ob- noxious review of the Quadrature of Curves in the Leipsic Acts. They all agreed in attaching the same injurious meaning to the passage which we formerly quoted, and authorized Keill to explain and defend his statement. He accordingly addressed a letter to Sir Hans Sloane, which was read at the society on the 24th May, 1711, and a copy of which was ordered to be sent to Leibnitz. In this letter, which is one of considerable length, he declares that he never meant to state that Leibnitz knew either the name of Newton's method or the form of notation, and that the real meaning of the passage was, " that Newton was the first inventor of fluxions or of the differential calculus, and that he had given, in two letters to Oldenburg, and which he had transmitted to Leibnitz, indications of it sufficiently intelligible to an acute mind, from which Leibnitz derived, or at least might derive, the principles of his calculus." The charge of plagiarism which Leibnitz thought was implied in the former letter of his antagonist is here greatly modified, if not altogether denied. Keill expresses only an opinion that the letter seen by Leibnitz contained intelligible indications of the fluxionary calculus. Even if this opinion were cor- rect, it is no proof that Leibnitz either saw these indi- cations or availed himself of them, or if he did per- ceive them, it might have been in consequence of his having previously been in possession of the differential calculus, or having enjoyed some distant view of it. Leibnitz should, therefore, have allowed the dispute to terminate here ; for no ingenuity on his part, and no additional facts, could affect an opinion which any other person as well as Keill was entitled to maintain. Leibnitz, however, took a different view of the subject, and wrote a letter to Sir Hans Sloane, dated December 19, 1711, which excited new feelings, HISTORY OF FLUXIONS. 189 and involved him in new embarrassments. Insensi- ble to the mitigation which had been kindly impressed bpon the supposed charge against his honour, he jalleges that Keill had attacked his candour and sin- scerity more openly than before; — that he acted (without any authority from Sir Isaac Newton, who jwas the party interested ; — and that it was in vain to justify his proceedings by referring to the provo- cation in the Leipsic Acts, because in that journal \no injustice had been done to any party, but every one \had received what was his due. He branded Keill with Ithe odious appellation of an upstart, and one little acquainted with the circumstances of the case ;* he called upon the society to silence his vain and un- just clamours,! which, he believed, were disapproved by Newton himself, who was well acquainted with te facts, and who, he was persuaded, would will- ingly give his opinion on the matter. This unfortunate letter was doubtless the cause of all the rancour and controversy which so speedily followed, and it placed his antagonist in a new and a more favourable position. It may be correct, thougfr few will admit it, that Keill's second letter was more injurious than the first; but it was not true that Keill acted without the authority of Newton, be- muse KeilPs letter was approved of and trans- mitted by the Royal Society, of which Newton was the president, and therefore became the act of that body. The obnoxious part, however, of Leibnitz's letter consisted in his appropriating to himself the opinions of the reviewer in the Leipsic Acts, by declaring that, in a review which charged Newton with plagiarism, every person had got what was his due. The whole character of the controversy was now changed : Leibnitz places himself in the * Homine docto, ged novo, et parjim perito rerum ante actarum cog nitare. t Vanae et injustae vociferationes. 190 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. position of the party who had first disturbed the tranquillity of science by maligning its most distin- guished ornament ; and the Royal Society was im- periously called upon to throw all the light they could upon a transaction which had exposed their venerable president to so false a charge. The so- ciety, too, had become a party to the question, by their approbation and transmission of Keill's second letter, and were on that account alone bound to vin- dicate the step which they had taken. When the letter of Leibnitz, therefore, was read, Keill appealed to the registers of the society for; the proofs of what he had advanced ; Sir Isaac also expressed his displeasure at the obnoxious passage in the Leipsic Review, and at the defence of it by Leibnitz, and he left it to the society to act as they thought proper. A committee was therefore ap- pointed on the 1 1th March, consisting of Dr. Arbuth- not, Mr. Hill, Dr. Halley, Mr. Jones, Mr. Machin, and Mr. Burnet, who were instructed to examine the ancient registers of the society, to inquire into the dispute, and to produce such documents as they should find, together with their own opinions on the subject. On the 24th April the committee produced the following report : — " We have consulted the letters and letter-books in the custody of the Royal Society, and those found among the papers of Mr. John Collins, dated between the years 1669 and 1677, inclusive ; and showed them to such as knew and avouched the hands of Mr. Barrow, Mr. Collins, Mr. Oldenburg, and Mr. Leibnitz; and compared those of Mr. Gregory with one another, and with copies of some of them taken in the hand of Mr. Collins ; and have extracted from them what relates to the matter re- ferred to us ; all which extracts herewith delivered to you we believe to be genuine and authentic. And by these letters and papers we find, — " I. Mr. Leibnitz was in London in the beginning REPORT OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY. 191 of the year 1673; and went thence, in or about March, to Paris, where he kept a correspondence with Mr. Collins by means of Mr. Oldenburg, till about September, 1676, and then returned by London and Amsterdam to Hanover : and that Mr. Collina was very free in communicating to able mathema- ticians what he had received from Mr. Newton and Mr. Gregory. " II. That when Mr. Leibnitz was the first time in London, he contended for the invention of another differential method properly so called ; and, notwith- standing that he was shown by Dr. Pell that it was Newton's method, persisted in maintaining it to be his own invention, by reason that he had found it by himself without knowing what Newton had done before, and had much improved it. And we find no mention of his having any other differential method than Newton's before his letter of the 21st of June, 1677, which was a year after a copy of Mr. Newton's letter of the 10th of December, 1672, had been sent to Paris to be communicated to him ; and above foui years after, Mr. Collins began to communicate that fetter to his correspondent; in which letter the method of fluxions was sufficiently described to any intelligent person. " III. That by Mr. Newton's letter of the 13th of June, 1676, it appears that he had the method of fluxions above five years before the writing of that letter. And by his Analysis per ^Equationes numero Terminorum Infinitas, communicated by Dr. Barrow to Mr. Collins in July, 1669, we find that he had in- vented the method before that time. " IV. That the differential method is one and the same with the method of fluxions, excepting the name and mode of notation ; Mr. Leibnitz calling those quantities differences which Mr. Newton calls moments or fluxions ; and marking them with the letter d — a mark not used by Mr. Newton. " And therefore we take the proper question to be 192 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. not who invented this or that method, but who was the first inventor of the method. And we believe that those who have reputed Mr. Leibnitz the first anventor knew little or nothing of his correspondence with Mr. Collins and Mr. Oldenburg long before, noi of Mr. Newton's having that method above fifteer Vears before Mr. Leibnitz began to publish it in the Acta Eruditorum of Leipsic. " For which reason we reckon Mr. Newton the first inventor ; and are of opinion that Mr. Keill, in asserting the same, has been no ways injurious to Mr. Leibnitz. And we submit to the judgment of the society whether the extract and papers now pre- sented to you, together with what is extant to the same purpose in Dr. Wallis's third volume, may not deserve to be made public." This report being read, the society unanimously ordered the collection of letters and manuscripts to be printed, and appointed Dr. Halley, Mr. Jones, and Mr. Machin to superintend the press. Complete copies of it, under the title of Commercium Epistoli- cwn D. Johannis Collins et aliorum de analyst promota, were laid before the society on the 8th January, 1713, and Sir Isaac Newton, as president, ordered a copy to be delivered to each person of the committee ap- pointed for that purpose, to examine it before its publication. Leibnitz received information of the appearance of the Commercium Epistolicum when he was at Vienna; and "being satisfied," as he expresses it, " that it must contain malicious falsehoods, I did not think proper to send for it by post, but wrote to M. Bernouilli to give me his sentiments. M. Bernoulli! wrote me a letter dated at Basle, June 7th, 1713, in which he said that it appeared probable that Sir Isaac Newton had formed his calculus after having seen mine"* This letter was published by a friend of * Letter to Count Bothman in Des Maizeaux's Recueil de diverse* vieces, torn ii, p. 41, 45. COMMERCIUM EPISTOLICUM. 193 Leibnitz, with reflections, in a loose sheet entitled Charta Volans, and dated July 29, 1713. It was widely circulated without either the name of the author, printer, or place of publication, and was communicated to the Journal Literaire by another friend of Leibnitz, who added remarks of his own, and stated, that when Newton published the Principia in 1687, he did not understand the true differential method ; and that he took his fluxions from Leibnitz. In this state of the controversy, Mr. Chamberlayne conceived the design of reconciling the two distin- guished philosophers ; and in a letter dated April 28, 1714,* he addressed himself to Leibnitz, who was still at Vienna. In replying to this letter, Leibnitz declared that he had given no occasion for the dis- pute ; " that Newton procured a book to be published, which was written purposely to discredit him, and sent it to Germany, &c. as in the name of the society ;" and he stated that there was room to doubt whether Newton knew his invention before he had it of him. Mr. Chamberlayne communicated this letter to Sir Isaac Newton, who replied that Leibnitz had attacked his reputation in 1705, by intimating that he had borrowed from him the method of fluxions ; that if Mr. C. could point out to him any thing in which he had injured Mr. Leibnitz, he would give him satisfaction ; that he would not retract things which he knew to be true ; and that he believed that the Royal Society had done no injustice by the publi- cation of the Commercium Epistolicum. The Royal Society, having learned that Leibnitz complained of their having condemned him unheard, inserted a declaration in their journals on the 20th May, 1714, that they did not pretend that the report of their committee should pass for a decision of the society. Mr. Chamberlayne sent a copy of this to Leibnitz, along with Sir Isaac's letter, and Dr. KeilTs * See Des Maizeaux, torn. ii. p. 116. R 194 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. answer to 'the papers inserted in the Journal Lite- raire. After perusing these documents, M. Leibnitz replied, " that Sir Isaac's letter was written with very little civility; that he was not in a humour to put himself in a passion against such people; that there were other letters among those of Olden- burg and Collins which should have been published; and that on his return to Hanover, he would be able to publish a Commercium Epistolicum which would be of service to the history of learning." When this letter was read to the Royal Society, Sir Isaac remarked, that the last part of it injuriously accused the society of having made a partial selection of papers for the Commercium Epistolicum ; that he did not interfere in any way in the publication of that work, and had even withheld from the com- mittee two letters, one from Leibnitz in 1693, and another from Wallis in 1695, which were highly favourable to his cause. He stated that he did not think it right for M. Leibnitz himself, but that, if he had letters to produce in his favour, that they might be published in the Philosophical Transac- tions, or in Germany. About this time the Abbe Conti, a noble Vene- tian, came to England. He was a correspondent of Leibnitz, and in a letter which he had received soon after his arrival,* he enters upon his dispute with Newton. He charges the English "with wishing , to pass for almost the only inventors." He declares " that Bernouilli had judged rightly in saying that Newton did not possess before him the infinitesimal characteristic and algorithm." He remarks that Newton preceded him only in series; and he con- fesses that during his second visit to England, "Col- lins showed him part of his correspondence," or, as he afterward expresses it, he saw " some of the let- ters of Newton at Mr. Collins's." He then attacks * Written in November or December, 1715. COMMERCIUM EPISTOLICUM. 195 Sir Isaac's philosophy, particularly his opinions about gravity and vacuum, the intervention of God for the preservation of his creatures ; and he accuses him of reviving the occult qualities of the schools. But the most remarkable passage in this letter is the following : " I am a great friend of experimental philosophy, but Newton deviates much from it when he pretends that all matter is heavy, or that each par- ticle of matter attracts every other particle." The above letter to the Abbe Conti was generally shown in London, and came to be much talked of at court, in consequence of Leibnitz having been privy counsellor to the Elector of Hanover when that prince ascended the throne of England. Many persons of distinction, and particularly the Abbe Conti, urged Newton to reply to Leibnitz's letter, but he resisted all their solicitations. One day, however, King George I. inquired when Sir Isaac Newton's answer to Leibnitz would appear; and when Sir Isaac heard this, he addressed a long reply to the Abbe Conti, dated February 26th, 0. S. 1715- 16. This letter, written with dignified severity, is a triumphant refutation of the allegations of his ad- versary ; and the following passage deserves to be quoted, as connected with that branch of the dispute which relates to Leibnitz's having seen part of Newton's letters to Mr. Collins. " He complains of the committee of the Royal Society, as if they had acted partially in omitting what made* against me ; but he fails in proving the accusation. For he instances in a paragraph concerning my ignorance, pretending that they omitted it, and yet you will rind it in the Commercium Epistolicum, p. 547, lines 2, 3, and I am not ashamed of it. He saith that he saw this paragraph in the hands of Mr. Collins when he was in London the second time, that is in Octo- ber, 1676. It is in my letter of the 24th of October, 1676, and therefore he then saw that letter. And 196 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. in that and some other letters writ before that time,' I described rny method of fluxions ; and in the same letter I described also two general methods of series, one of which is now claimed from me by Mr. Leib- nitz." The letter concludes with the following paragraph : " But as he has lately attacked me with an accusation which amounts to plagiary ; if he goes on to accuse me, it lies upon him by the laws of all nations to prove his accusations, on pain of being accounted guilty of calumny. He hath hitherto written letters to his correspondents full of affirma- tions, complaints, and reflections, without proving any thing. But he is the aggressor, and it lies upon him to prove the charge." In transmitting this letter to Leibnitz, the Abbe Conti informed him that he himself had read with great attention, and without the least prejudice, the Commercium Epistolicum, and the little piece* that contains the extract ; that he had also seen at the Royal Society the original papers of the Commer- cium Epistolicum, and some other original pieces relating to it. " From all this," says he, "I infer, that, if all the digressions are cut off, the only point is, whether Sir Isaac Newton had the method of fluxions or infinitesimals before you, or whether you had it before him. You published it first, it is true, but you have owned also that Sir Isaac Newton had given many hints of it in his letters to Mr. Olden- burg and others. This is proved very largely in the Commercium, and in the extract of it. What an- swer do you give ? This is still wanting to the public, in order to form an exact judgment of the affair." The Abbe adds, that Mr. Leibnitz's own friends waited for his answer with great impatience, and that they thought he could not dispense with answering, if not Dr. Keill, at least Sir Isaac New- * This is the Recensio Commercii Ipistolici, or review of it, which was first published in the Phil. Trans* 1715. GENERAL VIEW OF THE CONTROVERSY. 197 ton himself, who had given him a defiance in express terms. Leibnitz was not long- in complying with this request. He addressed a letter to the Abbe Conti, dated April 9th, 1716, but he sent it through M. Ra- mond at Paris, to communicate it to others. When it was received by the Abbe Conti, Newton wrote observations upon it, which were communicated only to some of his friends, and which, while they placed his defence on the most impregnable basis, at the same time threw much light on the early his- tory of his mathematical discoveries. The death of Leibnitz on the 14th November, 1716, put an end to this controversy, and Newton some time afterward published the correspondence with the Abbe Conti, which had hitherto been only privately circulated among the friends of the dispu- tants.* In 1722, a new edition of the Commercium Epis- tolicum was published, and there was prefixed to it a general review of its contents, which has been falsely ascribed to Newton. f When the third edi- * M. Biot remarks, that the animosity of Newton was not calmed by the death of Leibnitz, for he had no sooner heard of it than he caused to be printed two manuscript letters of Leibnitz, written in the preceding year, accompanying them with a very bitter refutation (en les accom- pagnant d'un refutation tres-amere). Who that reads this sentence does not believe that the bitter refutation was written after Leibnitz's death ? The animosity could not be shown by the simple publication of the letters. It could reside only in the bitterness of the refutation. The implied charge is untrue ; the bitter refutation was written before Leibnitz's death, and consequently he showed no animosity over the grave of his rival ; and in our opinion none even before his death. 1 M. Biot states that Sir Isaac Newton caused this edition of the Commercium Epistolicum to be printed ; that Sir Isaac placed at the head of it a partial abstract of the collection ; and that this abstract appeared to have been written by himself These groundless charges may be placed, without any refutation, beside the assertion of Montucla, that Newton wrote the notes (les notes) on the Commercium Epis- tolicum ; and the equally incorrect statement of La Croix, that Newton added to it notes (des notes), with his own hand. We should not h-rve noticed the charges of M. Bior, had he not adduced them as proofs of Newton's animosity to Leibnitz after his death. See Mr. Herschel's H istory of Mathematics in the Edinburgh Encyclopedia^ ToL xiii. p. 368, note. R2 198 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. tion of the Principia was published in 1725, the celebrated scholium which we have already quoted, and in which Leibnitz's differential calculus was mentioned, was struck out either by Newton or by the editor. This step was perhaps rash and ill- advised ; but as the scholium had been adduced by Leibnitz and others as a proof that Newton acknow- ledged him to be an independent inventor of the calculus, — an interpretation which it does not bear, and which Newton expressly states he never in- tended it to bear, — he was justified in withdrawing a passage which had been so erroneously inter- preted, and so greatly misapplied. In viewing this controversy, at the distance of more than a century, when the passions of the in- dividual combatants have been allayed, and national jealousies extinguished, it is not difficult to form a correct estimate of the conduct and claims of the two rival analysts. By the unanimous verdict of all nations, it has been decided that Newton invented fluxions at least ten years before Leibnitz. Some of the letters of Newton which bore reference to this great discovery were perused by the German mathematician ; but there is no evidence whatever that he borrowed his differential calculus from these letters. Newton was therefore the first inventor, and Leibnitz the second. It was impossible that the former could have been a plagiarist; but it was possible for the latter. Had the letters of Newton contained even stronger indications than they do of the new calculus, no evidence short of proof could have justified any allegation against Leibnitz's honour. The talents which he displayed in the im- provement of the calculus showed that he was capable of inventing it; and his character stood sufficiently high to repel every suspicion of his in- tegrity. But if it would have been criminal to charge Leibnitz with plagiarism, what must we think of those who dared to accuse Newton of bor GENERAL VIEW OF THE CONTROVERSY. 199 I rowing his fluxions from Leibnitz? This odious accusation was made by Leibnitz himself, and by Bernouilli ; and we have seen that the former re- peated it again and again, as if his own good name rested on the destruction of that of his rival. It was this charge against Newton that gave rise to the at- tack of Keill, and the publication of the Commercium Epistolicum ; and, notwithstanding this high provo- cation, the committee of the Royal Society contented themselves with asserting Newton's priority, with- out retorting the charge of plagiarism upon his rival. Although an attempt has been recently made to place the conduct of Leibnitz on the same level with that of Newton, yet the circumstances of the case will by no means justify such a comparison. The conduct of Newton was at all times dignified and just. He knew his rights, and he boldly claimed them. Conscious of his integrity, he spurned with indignation the charge of plagiarism with which an ungenerous rival had so insidiously loaded him ; and if there was one step in his frank and unhesitating procedure which posterity can blame it is his omis- sion, in the third edition of the Principia, of the references to the differential calculus of Leibnitz. This omission, however, was perfectly^ just. The scholium which he had left out was a mere historical statement of the fact, that the German mathemati- cian had sent him a method which was the same as his own ; and when he found that this simple asser- tion had been held by Leibnitz and others as a re- cognition of his independent claim to the invention, he was bound either to omit it altogether, or to enter into explanations which might have involved him in a new controversy. The conduct of Leibnitz was not marked with the same noble lineaments. That he was the aggressor is universally allowed. That he first dared to breathe the charge of plagiarism against Newton, and that he often referred to it, has been sufficiently 200 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. apparent; and when arguments failed him he had recourse to threats — declaring that he would publish another Commercium Epistolicum, though he had no appropriate letters to produce. All this is now matter of hietory ; and we may find some apology for it in his excited feelings, and in the insinuations which were occasionally thrown out against the originality of his discovery.; but for other parts of his conduct we seek in vain for an excuse. When he assailed the philosophy of Newton in his letters to the Abbe Conti, he exhibited perhaps only the petty feelings of a rival ; but when he dared to ca- lumniate that great man in his correspondence with the Princess of Wales, by whom he was respected and beloved; when he ventured to represent the Newtonian philosophy as physically false, and as dangerous to religion ; and when he founded these accusations on passages in the Principia and the Optics glowing with all the fervour of genuine piety, he cast a blot upon his name, which all his talents as a philosopher, and all his virtues as a man, will never be able to efface. CHAPTER XIII. James IT. attacks the Privileges of the University of Cambridge — New- Ion chosen one of the Delegates to resist this Encroachment — He is elected a Member of the Convention Parliament — Burning of his Manuscripts— His supposed Derangement of Mind — View taken of this by foreign Philosophers — His Correspondence with Mr. Ptpys and Mr 1 Locke at the time of his Illness— Mr. Millingtori's Letter to Mr. Pepys on the subject of Newton's Illness — Refutation of the Statement that he laboured under Mental Derangement. FROM the year 1669, when Newton was installed in the Lucasian chair, till 1095, when he ceased to reside in Cambridge, he seems to have been seldom absent from his college more than three or four UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE. 201 ireeks in the year. In 1675, he received a dispensa- tion from Charles II. to continue in his fellowship of Trinity College without taking orders, and we have already seen in the preceding chapter how his time was occupied till the publication of the Principia in 1687. An event now occurred which drew Newton from the seclusion of his studies, and placed him upon the theatre of public life. Desirous of re-establishing the Catholic faith in its former supremacy, King James II. had begun to assail the rights and privi- leges of his Protestant subjects. Among other illegal acts, he sent his letter of mandamus to the University of Cambridge to order Father Francis, an ignorant monk of the Benedictine order, to be received as master of arts, and to enjoy all the privileges of this degree, without taking the oaths of allegiance and supremacy. The university speedily perceived the consequences which might arise from such a meas- ure. Independent of the infringement of their rights which such an order involved, it was obvious that the highest interests of the university were endan- gered, and that Roman Catholics might soon become a majority in the convocation. They therefore unanimously refused to listen to the royal order, and they did this with a firmness of purpose which irri- tated the despotic court. The king reiterated his commands, and accompanied them with the severest threatenings in case of disobedience. The Catho- lics were not idle in supporting the views of the sovereign. The honorary degree of M.A. which conveys no civil rights to its possessor, having been formerly given to the secretary of the ambassador from Morocco, it was triumphantly urged that the University of Cambridge had a greater regard for a Mahometan than for a Roman Catholic, and was more obsequious to the ambassador from Morocco than to their own lawful sovereign. Though this reasoning might impose upon the ignorant, it pro- 202 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. duced little effect upon the members of the univer- sity. A few weak-minded individuals, however, were disposed to yield a reluctant consent to the royal wishes. They proposed to confer the degree, and at the same time to resolve that it should not in future be regarded as a precedent. To this it was replied, that the very act of submission in one case would be a stronger argument for continuing the practice than any such resolution would be against its repetition. The university accordingly remained firm in their original decision. The vice-chancellor was summoned before the ecclesiastical commission to answer for this act of contempt. Newton was among the number of those who resisted the wishes of the court, and he was consequently chosen one of the nine delegates who were appointed to defend the independence of the university. These dele- gates appeared before the High Court. They main- tained that not a single precedent could be found to justify so extraordinary a measure ; and they showed that Charles II. had, under similar circumstances, been pleased to withdraw his mandamus. This representation had its full weight, and the king was induced to abandon his design.* The part which Newton had taken in this affair, and the high character which he now held in the scientific world, induced his friends to propose him as member of parliament for the university. He was accordingly elected in 1688, though by a very narrow majority,! and he sat in the Convention Parliament till its dissolution. In the year 1688 and 1689, Newton was absent from Cambridge during the greater part of the year, owing, we presume, to his attendance in parliament; but it appears from * See Burnet's History of his own Times, vol. i. p. 697. Lond. 1724. 1 The other candidates were Sir Robert Sawyer and Mr. Finch, ami the votes stood thus. Sir Robert Sawyer, 125 Mr. Newton, 122 Mr. Finch, 117 BURNING OF HIS MANUSCRIPTS. 203 lie books of the University that from 1690 to 1695 le was seldom absent, and must therefore have renounced his parliamentary duties. During his stay in London he had no doubt expe- rienced the unsuitableness of his income to the new rircum stances in which he was placed, and it is probable that this was the cause of the limitation )f his residence to Cambridge. His income was certainly very confined, and but little suited to the generosity of his disposition. Demands were doubt- ess made upon it by some of his less wealthy rela- ives ; and there is reason to think that he himself, is well as his influential friends, had been looking "orward to some act of liberality on the part of the ;overnment. An event however occurred which will ever form an epoch in his history ; and it is a singular circum- stance, that this incident has been for more than a century unknown to his own countrymen, and has >een accidentally brought to light by the examina- ion of the manuscripts of Huygens. This event has been magnified into a temporary aberration of nind, which is said to have arisen from a cause scarcely adequate to its production. While he was attending divine service in a winter norning, he had left in his study a favourite little dog called Diamond. Upon returning from chapel found that it had overturned a lighted taper on lis desk, which set fire to several papers on which he had recorded the results of some optical experi- ments. These papers are said to have contained the Labours of many years, and it has been stated that when Mr. Newton perceived the magnitude of his loss, be exclaimed, " Oh, Diamond, Diamond, little do you know the mischief you have done me !" It is a curious circumstance that Newton never refers to the experiments which he is said to have lost on this occasion, and his nephew, Mr. Conduit, makes no allusion to the event itself. The distress, however 204 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. which it occasioned is said to have been so deep a» to affect even the powers of his understanding. This extraordinary effect was first communicated to the world in the Life of Newton by M. Biot, who received the following account of it from the cele- brated M. Van Swinden. "There is among the manuscripts of the cele- brated Huygens a small journal in folio, in which he used to note down different occurrences. It is side £ No. 8, p. 112, in the catalogue of the library of Leyden. The following extract is written by Huygens himself, with whose handwriting I am well acquainted, having had occasion to peruse several of his manuscripts and autograph letters. ' On the 29th May, 1694, M. Colin,* a Scotsman, informed me that eighteen months ago the illustrious geometer, Isaac Newton, had become insane, either in consequence of his too intense application to his studies, or from ex- cessive grief at having lost, by fire, his chymical labora- tory and several manuscripts. When he came to the Archbishop of Cambridge, he made some observations which indicated an alienation of mind. He was imme- diately taken care of by his friends, who confined him to his house and applied remedies, by means of which he had now so far recovered his health that he began to under- stand the PrincipiaS " Huygens mentioned this cir- cumstance to Leibnitz, in a letter dated 8th June. 1694, to which Leibnitz replies in a letter dated the 23d, " I am very glad that I received information of 1 the cure of Mr. Newton, at the same time that I firsl heard of his illness, which doubtless must have beer * This M. Colin was probably a young bachelor of arts whom New ton seems afterward to have employed in some of his calculations These bachelors were distinguished by the title of Dominus, and it was usual to translate this word and to call them Sir. In a letter from New ton to Flamstead, dated Cambridge, June 29th, 1695, is the following passage : " I want not your calculations, but your observations only, for besides myself and my servant, Sir Collins (whom I can employ for f little money, which I value not) tells me that he can calculate "an eclipw and work truly. STATE OF HIS MIND. 205 very alarming. ' It is to men like you and him, sir, that I wish a long life.' " The first publication of the preceding statement produced a strong sensation among the friends and admirers of Newton. They could not easily believe in the prostration of that intellectual strength which had unbarred the strongholds of the universe. The unbroken equanimity of Newton's mind, the purity of his moral character, his temperate and abstemious life, his ardent and unaffected piety, and the weak- ness of his imaginative powers, all indicated a mind which was not likely to be overset by any affliction to which it could be exposed. The loss of a few ixperimental records could never have disturbed the equilibrium of a mind like his. If they were the records of discoveries, the discoveries themselves ndestructible would have been afterward given to the world. If they were merely the details of ex- Derimental results, a little time could have easily 'eproduced them. Had these records contained the irst fruits of early genius — of obscure talent, on which fame had not yet shed its rays, we might have supposed that the first blight of such early ambition would have unsettled the stability of an untried mind. But Newton was satiated with fame. His mightiest discoveries were completed and diffused over all Europe, and he must have felt himself )laced on the loftiest pinnacle of earthly ambition. The incredulity which such views could not fail to encourage was increased by the novelty of the in. rormation. No English biographer had ever alluded o such an event. History and tradition were equally silent, and it was not easy to believe that the Luca- sian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge, a mem- ber of the English parliament, and the first philoso- pher in Europe could have lost his reason without the dreadful fact being known to his own countrymen. But if the friends of Newton were surprised by the nature of the intelligence, they wrere distressed S 206 SIR ISAAC NEWTON* at the view which was taken of it by foreign philoso- phers. While one maintained that the intellectual exertions of Newton had terminated with the publica- tion of the Principia, and that the derangement of his mind was the cause of his abandoning the sci- ences, others indirectly questioned the sincerity of his religious views, and ascribed to the aberration of his mind those theological pursuits which gilded his declining age. " But the fact," says M. Biot, " of the derangement of his intellect, whatever may have been the cause of it, will explain why, after the publication of the Principia in 1687, Newton, though only forty-five years old, never more published a new work on any branch of science, but contented himself with giving to the world those which he had composed long before that epoch, confining himself to the completion of those parts which might require development. We may also remark, that even these developments appear always to be derived from experiments and observations formerly made, such as the additions to the second edition of the Principia, published in 1713, the experiments on thick plates, those on diffraction, and the chymical queries placed at the end of the Optics in 1704 ; for in giving an account of these experiments Newton distinctly says that they were taken from ancient manuscripts which he had formerly composed ; and he adds, that though he felt the necessity of extend- ing them, or rendering them more perfect, he was not able to resolve to do this, these matters being no longer in his way. Thus it appears that though he had recovered his health sufficiently to understand all his researches, and even in some cases to make additions to them, and useful alterations, as appears from the second edition of the Principia, for which he kept up a very active mathematical correspond- ence with Mr. Cotes, yet he did not wish to under- take new labours in those departments t>f science where he had done so much, and where he so dis- STATE OF HIS MIND. 207 tinctly saw what remained to be done." Under the influence of the same opinion, M. Biot finds " it ex- tremely probable that his dissertation on the scale of heat was written before the fire in his laboratory;" he describes Newton's conduct about the longitude bill as " almost puerile on so solemn an occasion, and one which might lead to the strangest conclu- sions, particularly if we refer it to the fatal accident which Newton had suffered in 1695." The celebrated Marquis de la Place viewed the illness of Newton in a light still more painful to his friends. He maintained that he never recovered the vigour of his intellect, and he was persuaded that Newton's theological inquiries did not commence till after that afflicting epoch of his life. He even commissioned Professor Gautier of Geneva to make inquiries on this subject during his visit to England, as if it concerned the interests of truth and justice to show that Newton became a Christian and a theological writer only after the decay of his strength and the eclipse of his reason. Such having been the consequences of the dis- closure of Newton's illness by the manuscript of Huygens, I felt it to be a sacred duty to the memory of that great man, to the feelings of his countrymen, and to the interests of Christianity itself, to inquire into the nature and history of that indisposition which seems to have been so much misrepresented and misapplied. From the ignorance of so extraor- dinary an event which has prevailed for such a long period in England, it might have been urged with some plausibility that Huygens had mistaken the real import of the information that was conveyed to him ; or that the Scotchman from whom he received it had propagated an idle and a groundless rumour. But we are, fortunately, not confined to this very reasonable mode of defence. There exists at Cam- bridge a manuscript journal written by Mr. Abraham de la Pryme, who was a student in the university 208 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. while Newton was a fellow of Trinity. This manu- script is entitled " Ephemeris Vita, or Diary of my own Life, containing an account likewise of the most observable and remarkable things that I have taken notice of from my youth up hitherto." Mr. de la Pryme was born in 1671, and begins the diary in 1685. This manuscript is in the possession of his collateral descendant, George Pryme, Esq., Profes- sor of Political Economy at Cambridge, to whom I have been indebted for the following extract. " 1692, February 3d. — What I heard to-day I must relate. There is one Mr. Newton (whom I have very oft seen), Fellow of Trinity College, that is mighty famous for his learning, being a most excel- lent mathematician, philosopher, divine, &c. He has been Fellow of the Royal Society these many years; and among other very learned books and tracts, he's written one upon the mathematical prin- ciples of philosophy, which has got him a mighty name, he having received, especially from Scotland, abundance of congratulatory letters for the same ; but of all the books that he ever wrote, there was one of colours and light, established upon thousands of experiments which he had been twenty years of making, and which had cost him many hundred of pounds. This book, which he valued so much, and which was so much talked of, had the ill luck to perish and be utterly lost just when the learned author was almost at putting a conclusion at the same, after this manner: In a winter's morning, leaving it among his other papers on his study table while he went to chapel, the candle, which he had unfortunately left burning there too, catched hold by some means of other papers, and they fired the aforesaid book, and utterly consumed it and several other valuable writings ; and, which is most wonder- ful, did no further mischief. But when Mr. Newton came from chapel, and had seen what was done, every one thought he would have run mad, he wa» STATE OF HIS MIND. 209 50 troubled thereat that he was not himself for a nonth after. A long account of this his system of ight and colours you may find in the Transactions )f the Royal Society, which he had sent up to them ong before this sad mischance happened unto him." From this extract we are enabled to fix the ap- roximate date of the accident by which Newton ost his papers. It must have been previous to the d January, 1692, a month before the date of the xtract ; but if we fix it by the dates in Huygens's lanuscript, we should place it about the 29th No ember, 1692, eighteen months previous to the onversation between Collins and Huygens. The nanner in which Mr. Pryme refers to Newton's tate of mind is that which is used every day when ve speak of the loss of tranquillity which arises 'om the ordinary afflictions of life ; and the meaning f the passage amounts to nothing more than that Newton was very much troubled by the destruction f his papers, and did not recover his serenity, and eturn to his usual occupations, for a month. The ery phrase that " every person thought he would ave run mad" is in itself a proof that no such effect as produced ; and, whatever degree of indisposi- pn may be implied in the phrase "he was not nimself for a month after," we are entitled to infer that one month was the period of its duration, and that previous to the 3d February, 1692, the date of Mr. Pryme's memorandum, "Newton was himself again." These facts and dates cannot be reconciled with those in Huygens's manuscript. It appears from that document, that, so late as May, 1694, Newton had only so far recovered his health as to begin to again understand the Principia. His supposed [malady, therefore, was in force from the 3d of ! January, 1692, till the month of May, 1694, — a iperiod of more than two years. Now, it is a most important circumstance, which M. Biot ought to have known, that in the very middle of this period, S3 210 SIR ISAAC NEWTON. Newton wrote his four celebrated letters to Dr. Bentley on the Existence of a Deity, — letters which evince a power of thought and a serenity of mind absolutely incompatible even with the slightest ob- 1 scuration of his faculties. No man can peruse these 1 letters without the conviction that their author their possessed the full vigour of his reason, and was< capable of understanding the most profound parts) of his writings. The first of these letters was writ-! ten on the 10th December, 1692, the second on thej 17th January, 1693, the third on the 25th February! and the 4th on the llth* February, 1693. His mini was, therefore, strong and vigorous on these four) occasions; and as the letters were written at thej express request of Dr. Bentley, who had been ap-f pointed to deliver the lecture founded by Mr. Boylej for vindicating the fundamental principles of natural! and revealed religion, we must consider such a re-? quest as showing his opinion of the strength and freshness of his friend's mental powers. In 1692, Newton, at the request of Dr. Wallis, transmitted to him the first proposition of his book on quadratures, with examples of 'it in first, second, and third fluxions. f These examples were written in consequence of an application from his friend; and the author of the review of the Commercium Epistolicum, in which this fact is quoted, draws the conclusion, that he had not at that time forgotten his method of second fluxions. It appears, also, from the second book of the Optics,J that in the month of June, 1692, he had been occupied with the subject of haloes, and had made accurate observations both on the colours and the diameters of the rings in a halo which he had then seen around the sun. * They are thus dated in Horsley's edition of Newton's Works, the fourth letter having an earlier date than the third. t See Newtoni Opera, torn. iv. p. 480, and Wallasii Opera. 1693, torn. U. p. 391-396. ; Optics, part iT. obs. 13. STATE OF HIS MIND. 211 But though these facts stand in direct contradic- tion to the statement recorded by Huygens, the reader will be naturally anxious to know the real nature and extent of the indisposition to which it refers. The following letters,* written by Newton himself, Mr. Pepys, Secretary to the Admiralty, and Mr. Millington of Magdalene College, Cambridge, will throw much light upon the subject. Newton, as will be presently seen, had fallen into a bad state of health some time in 1692, in conse- quence of which both his sleep and his appetite were greatly affected. About the middle of Sep- tember, 1693, he had been kept awake for five nights by this nervous disorder, and in this condition he wrote the following letter to Mr. Pepys : " SIR, Sept. 13, 1693. " Some time after Mr. Millington had delivered your message, he pressed me to see you the next time I went to London. I was averse ; but upon his pressing consented, before I considered what I did, for I am extremely troubled at the embroilment I am in, and have neither ate nor slept well this twelvemonth, nor have my former consistency of mind. I never designed to get any thing by your interest, nor by King James's favour, but am now sensible that I must withdraw from your acquaint- ance, and see neither you nor the rest of my friends any more, if I may but leave them quietly. I beg your pardon for saying I would see you again, and rest your most humble and most obedient servant, " I«. NEWTON." From this letter we learn, on his own authority, that his complaint had lasted for a twelvemonth, and that during that twelvemonth he neither ate nor slept well, nor enjoyed his former consistency of * For these letters I have been indebted to the kindness of Lord Br»F- brooke. 212 SIR ISAAC NEWTON mind. It is not easy to understand exactly what is meant by not enjoying his former consistency of mind ; but whatever be its import, it is obvious that he must have been in a state of mind so sound as to enable him to compose the four letters to Bentley, all of which were written during the twelvemonth here referred to. On the receipt of this letter, his friend Mr. Pepys seems to have written to Mr. Millington of Magda- lene College to inquire after Mr. Newton's health ; but the inquiry having been made in a vague man- ner, an answer equally vague was returned. Mr. Pepys, however, who seems to have been deeply anxious about Newton's health, addressed the fol- lowing more explicit letter to his friend Mr. Mil- lington : — " SIR, Septemb. 26, 1693. "After acknowledging your many old favours, give me leave to do it a little more particularly upon occasion of the new one conveyed to me by my nephew Jackson. Though, at the same time, I must acknowledge myself not at the ease I would be glad to be at in reference to the excellent Mr. Newton ; concerning whom (methinks) your answer labours under the same kind of restraint which (to tell you the truth) my asking did. For I was loth at first dash to tell you that I had lately received a letter from him so surprising to me for the incon- sistency of every part of it, as to be put into great disorder by it, from the concernment I have for him, lest it should arise from that which of all mankind I should least dread from him and most lament for, — I mean a discomposure in head, or mind, or both. Let me therefore beg you, sir, having now told you the true ground of the trouble I lately gave you, to let me know the very truth of the matter^ as far at least as comes within your knowledge. For I own too great an esteem for Mr. Newton, as for a public good, to STATE OF HIS MIND. 213 1 >e able to let any doubt in me of this kind concern- ng him lie a moment uncleared, where I can have my hopes of helping it. I am, with great truth and respect, dear sir, your most humble, and most af- fectionate servant, " S. PEPYS." • To this letter Mr. Millington made the following reply : — Coll. Magd. Canib. " HONOR'D SIR, Sept. the 30, 1693. " Coming home from a journey on the 28th instant at night, I met with your letter which you were )leased to honour me with of the 26th. I am much troubled I was not at home in time for the post, that I might as soon as possible put you out of your generous payne that you are in for the worthy Mr Newton. I was, I must confess, very much surprised at the inquiry you were pleased to make by your Lephew about the message that Mr. Newton made -he ground of his letter to you, for I was very sure I never either received from you or delivered to him any such, and therefore I went immediately to wayt iipon him, with a design to discourse him about the (matter, but, he was out of town, and since I have not seen him, till upon the 28th I met him at Hunt- ingdon, where, upon his own accord, and before I had time to ask him any question, he told me that he had writt to you a very odd letter, at which he was much concerned ; added, that it was in a dis- temper that much seized his head, and that kept him awake for above five nights together, which upon occasion he desired I would represent to you, and beg your pardon, he being very much ashamedj he should be so rude to a person for whom he hath" so great an honour. He is now very well, and, though I fear he is under some small degree of melancholy,